|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/28/2013
Posts: 548
|
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 8/9/2009
Posts: 1,935
|
Yes
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/28/2013
Posts: 548
|
It is not worded in a strong manner like lightsaber throw 5 is. That says it removes cover so it is obvious to me that stealth dissapears. Accurate shot is worded in such a way that it could be interpreted that stealth would supercede accurate shot.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/29/2011
Posts: 1,246
Location: SWMing now in the 936
|
Focus on "with cover" and that addresses stealth question.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 2/17/2009
Posts: 1,446
|
Targeting rules say if you want to target an enemy with cover, it has to be the nearest enemy.
Stealth says that if this character has cover, it is NEVER the nearest enemy for an attacker more than six squares away (hence can generally NOT be targeted),
BUT
Accurate Shot is an exception to the targeting rules, allowing you to target an enemy with cover even if it is not the nearest. Since Accurate Shot removes the need for the enemy to be the nearest, Stealth has no effect.
|
|
Rank: Felucian Warrior on Rancor
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/23/2013
Posts: 52
|
When I was younger...I found this to be the most confusing rule of them all pretty much. Cover and legal targets but after having it explained step by step it's not hard to grasp.
|
|
|
Guest |