|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/26/2011
Posts: 951
|
Okay, the situation is a character with splash and twin kills a character on the first part of the twin. It is my understanding that you would still roll the second part of the twin. So in the case of a character being adjacent it would make two splash saves and not one.
Am I correct in my assumption that even if you kill a character on the first part of the twin, with splash, the characters adjacent will need to make two splash saves?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/30/2008
Posts: 1,288
|
No, I don't think that's right. You check for deaths between attacks even with Twin, and if you don't have a legal target any longer you don't actually get the Twin.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/5/2009
Posts: 2,240
Location: Akron Ohio, just south of dantooine.
|
Echo24 is right.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
Echo24 wrote:No, I don't think that's right. You check for deaths between attacks even with Twin, and if you don't have a legal target any longer you don't actually get the Twin. ^ this is correct, the target is removed from the board before the twin would happen
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/26/2011
Posts: 951
|
I thought it heard that if two guys with Djem so and twin went at it you could keep going for a while?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/28/2013
Posts: 548
|
swinefeld wrote:Echo24 wrote:No, I don't think that's right. You check for deaths between attacks even with Twin, and if you don't have a legal target any longer you don't actually get the Twin. ^ this is correct, the target is removed from the board before the twin would happen A legal target would be irrelevant in regards to twin, right? I thought that the "twin" or second shot had to be against the same target, so if they died you would not get it.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
|
Right - the same character is the only one who can be the legal target for a Twin Attack. So if they are defeated, you don't have a legal target for the attack. Also, Veers from Dark Times might let a character move out of line of sight between the first and the Twin attacks. Same result: no target for the Twin Attack so it is canceled.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/30/2008
Posts: 2,093
|
In this case it doesn't make a difference because the guy died but you still have to be a legal target to get twin
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/26/2011
Posts: 951
|
Awesome, thanks for clearing that up guys.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 2/17/2009
Posts: 1,446
|
atmsalad wrote:I thought it heard that if two guys with Djem so and twin went at it you could keep going for a while? In that case, it's the Djem So, more than the twin, that keeps it going. Djem So is a non-optional save that triggers when you're hit, so you have to make the save, even if the hit would kill you (because Djem So triggers when hit and you go back to the top of the list without resolving the damage). So as long as you keep making your save 11 and hitting back, it'll keep going. Twin just makes the record keeping more interesting.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/26/2011
Posts: 951
|
UrbanShmi wrote:atmsalad wrote:I thought it heard that if two guys with Djem so and twin went at it you could keep going for a while? In that case, it's the Djem So, more than the twin, that keeps it going. Djem So is a non-optional save that triggers when you're hit, so you have to make the save, even if the hit would kill you (because Djem So triggers when hit and you go back to the top of the list without resolving the damage). So as long as you keep making your save 11 and hitting back, it'll keep going. Twin just makes the record keeping more interesting. It definitely does! Lol
|
|
|
Guest |