|
Heck yeah - R&I was lame, and I want to ignore it
|
22
|
  
55.000000
%
|
|
No way - R&I is legit, and I want it always there
|
5
|
12.500000
%
|
|
I could care less
|
13
|
32.500000
%
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
|
Is it just me?
I have a complete collection (IMO). But I didn't collect R&I. I thought it was an alright idea for people getting into the game late and needing old figures, (even though they could have picked better figures for the set!) BUT - R&I shouldn't be counted in our total of figures needed.
I'm not gonna lie - it bugs me a little when Bloomilk tells me my collection is not complete. I know it shouldn't, but it does. It tells me I am missing (for example) Boba Fett from R&I. WHAT? I have THREE of the exact same thing from Rebel Storm! I hate reprints as it is, but I draw the line at overpriced, out-dated rares and VRs that I already have.
My suggestion:
There should be a toggle option to have R&I as a part of our inventory only if we want it to be. It should please everyone this way. I have no idea how hard it would be to impliment.
I saw that MANY people reject R&I like I do in the complete collection poll, so I assume I am not alone in this.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
Bugs me too. TOGGLE IT !!!
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,220
Location: East Coast
|
Why not just tell "BlooMilk" that you already have those figures? (edit that set and place a 1 in all the "have" spots) I mean technically don't you already have them? (from RS...they were just reprints anyway...). Then your collection will be complete. 
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/28/2008
Posts: 355
Location: Newark, OH, USA
|
It is a bit bothersome to have that less than 100% collection rate due to R&I. :) If the fix is a relatively easy one, I would like to see the toggle option. I would not want to see R&I go away entirely since that is the only version of those pieces for some people. BTW - By option 3, don't you mean 'could NOT care less'? Sorry, pet peeve of mine. If you could care less, it implies that there is some other issue that is less important and therefore possible to care less about. Many people using that expression really mean they could not care less, as in, there is nothing less important to them right now. Just playing with you - I always give my students a hard time about that one and could not resist. That's what we language teachers do for fun, I guess.  Back to the topic at hand...
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
|
Squid89 wrote:BTW - By option 3, don't you mean 'could NOT care less'? Sorry, pet peeve of mine. If you could care less, it implies that there is some other issue that is less important and therefore possible to care less about. Many people using that expression really mean they could not care less, as in, there is nothing less important to them right now. Just playing with you - I always give my students a hard time about that one and could not resist. That's what we language teachers do for fun, I guess. Lol, good point. I have used it for so long, I don't even think about it. I guess my (possibly weak) counter-arguement for it's use is that it is sarcasm. If we could only use purely literal language - it would get pretty boring. The purpose of language is to communicate, and so I appologize to anyone who I confused with that usage.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
imyurhukaberry wrote:Why not just tell "BlooMilk" that you already have those figures? (edit that set and place a 1 in all the "have" spots) I mean technically don't you already have them? (from RS...they were just reprints anyway...). Then your collection will be complete. I have it set that way. It throws off the "value" of my collection in the tracker, and the total minis count, which are yet more petty annoyances that really don't matter much in the grand scheme of things. 
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/30/2009
Posts: 1,389
Location: New Zealand ( kind of by Australia)
|
*yawns* Don't care.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
|
Squid89 wrote:It is a bit bothersome to have that less than 100% collection rate due to R&I. :) If the fix is a relatively easy one, I would like to see the toggle option. I would not want to see R&I go away entirely since that is the only version of those pieces for some people. swinefeld wrote:imyurhukaberry wrote:Why not just tell "BlooMilk" that you already have those figures? (edit that set and place a 1 in all the "have" spots) I mean technically don't you already have them? (from RS...they were just reprints anyway...). Then your collection will be complete. I have it set that way. It throws off the "value" of my collection in the tracker, and the total minis count, which are yet more petty annoyances that really don't matter much in the grand scheme of things. Glad I'm not the only one who feels this way too. I do know it may be petty, but let's face it - we're gamers and collectors. If we weren't in some ways a little anal retentive, we wouldn't be into minis.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/7/2008
Posts: 377
Location: Mexico D.F.
|
Yes I think the Same, Bloomilk will keep only in the minis of the sets and maybe the extra minis of Scenarios, but not R&I, it will be put out, greettings.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/28/2009
Posts: 270
Location: Vero Beach,Florida
|
i doint care either
|
|
|
Guest |