RegisterDonateLogin

Has the high ground.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Poll Question : What's the worst set in history of SWM?
Choice Votes Statistics
Rebel Storm 6 10.526315 %
Clone Strike 7 12.280701 %
Revenge of the Sith 30 52.631578 %
Universe 2 3.508771 %
Bounty Hunters 4 7.017543 %
Alliance and Empire 5 8.771929 %
Clone Wars 3 5.263157 %

The WORST set of all-time Options
creme_brule
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:45:57 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/31/2009
Posts: 1,701
wondering what YOU thought was the worst set of all time in history of SWM...you acatually may be wondering why i posted the specific sets i did above and not some others...well...

for starters, i posted them up because of their face value; meaning, becuase they had such a bad ratio of bad (and/or worthless) figures to good figures. For ex.; Universe. They pretty much had 6 worthwhile figs IMO: Ackbar, Vader, GMA, Nom, Warmaster, and Rancor. The rest were all duds, either right off the bat (Nein Nub; Ponda Baba + Dr. Evazan duo) or they just became outdated due to power creep (ex. Luke JM, Obi on Boga). (NOTE: BH was a toss up undre this category, their ratio of bad to good was extremely high, though the "goods" were all extremely good)

second, the next category was sculpt taste (how the figures look). this was meant directly towards AE...AE MIGHT (i emphasize MIGHT) have been a decent set had it not been for the square bases (And maybe the card background color)...nice idea, though not very popular among SWM fans.

third, i chose BC it was a not-worthwhile (per se) set. such as CW. CW was a great set...except, the eras that needed MUCH mroe figures (Sith, OR, NR, YV, Mandos, etc.) were not included. Many people complained that the repubs, rebel, imp (top 3 factions) were getting too many charcters while they left the others in the dust. Though, i must say Holosid was one of the greatest additions to the Sith faction.

so, what do you think? so far, im leaning towards Universe (or AE)...
IG-108
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:53:53 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/30/2008
Posts: 488
Location: Wisconsin
Though I like the CW era related sets, Revenge of the Sith had to have been one of the worse to come out. It may have been good at first, but there were really only one or two useful pieces. Doombot is still useful today, and Palpatine, Sith Lord were really the only two useful pieces in my opinion. Grievous's wheel bike was nice, but how often is that really used these days?
All the Jedi that came out weren't much of an improvement on the ones that came in Clone Strike, and the rest of the pieces didn't bring much to the game. General Grievous, Supreme Commander had a nice life as the only good droid commander, but the Sep faction quickly became outdated and not very useful until GGDAC came out and saved them. Darth Vader wasn't that amazing, especially when Universe came out right after RotS, and we can't forget Boba Fett, young Mercenary or Grievous, Jedi Hunter with no Jedi hunter ability (though Quadruple attack was nice for a short time).

All in all, RotS couldn't top Clone Strike set that came out before it, and was quickly outdated when Universe came out. There were only two or three pieces from that set that are still used today competitively (not as filler/activation fodder).
wannabe mexican
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:02:04 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/10/2010
Posts: 1,153
I can't really vote atm because I don't particularly know much about the game's early days. But that is interesting that you have put those as the possible worst sets. Expecially Bounty Hunters, which to a new comer, is one of the most expensive and difficult to get hold of sets.
R5Don4
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:26:01 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/27/2008
Posts: 832
I voted Clone Wars. The powercreep cranked up to 36 was not a good thing for the game.
joelker41
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 11:44:35 AM
Rank: Grand Master Yoda
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/13/2008
Posts: 508
creme_brule wrote:
wondering what YOU thought was the worst set of all time in history of SWM...you acatually may be wondering why i posted the specific sets i did above and not some others...well...

for starters, i posted them up because of their face value; meaning, becuase they had such a bad ratio of bad (and/or worthless) figures to good figures. For ex.; Universe. They pretty much had 6 worthwhile figs IMO: Ackbar, Vader, GMA, Nom, Warmaster, and Rancor. The rest were all duds, either right off the bat (Nein Nub; Ponda Baba + Dr. Evazan duo) or they just became outdated due to power creep (ex. Luke JM, Obi on Boga). (NOTE: BH was a toss up undre this category, their ratio of bad to good was extremely high, though the "goods" were all extremely good)

second, the next category was sculpt taste (how the figures look). this was meant directly towards AE...AE MIGHT (i emphasize MIGHT) have been a decent set had it not been for the square bases (And maybe the card background color)...nice idea, though not very popular among SWM fans.


Actually as I usually do I disagree with you completely.

1st off:

Universe isn't even close to being the worst set ever.

Thrawn and Vader defined Meta from basically their inception and created their own meta essentially with Thrawn's MT and Force Bubble was insane back in the day.

Vader eliminated entire squads from contention single-handidly.

There are other pieces that were good/still are in Universe like:

Nom
Han RH
Chewie RH
Xizor
Nightsister Sith Witch
AT-ST

Amazing sculpts in the set:

Obi on Boga
Hailfire
Reek
Acklay


Definitely not the worst set. Not even close.

#2

A&E? Your reasoning is Square bases? Really?

No one I know in many areas of the country including my own players care about square bases, in many cases my experience is the people who complain about them usually have many complaints over issues that oftentimes don't matter.

You clearly need to go reread the set list if you put A&E out there.

Why? Game defining pieces/faction essential pieces:

Princess Leia
Mara Jade, Jedi
Lando DS (greatest cheap shooter in the game for what 3 years?)
Advance Scout/Yomin (Gave the Vong a meta option with Nom)
Han STA (people are inventing new ways to use him daily)
Luke's Landspeeder
Jabba (made many new squad types usable)
Luke CoF (God squad anyone?)
Vader Imp Comm/Piett (made trooper squads worth playing)

That is a great NR piece, entire Vong faction playable, and at least 4 different Imp/Rebel squads could be used when it couldn't before.

Definitely not A&E either.




My vote?

Revenge of the Sith. Has flash in the pan relevance with R2, Palpy SL, San Hill and maybe 1 or 2 more pieces but overall the rares are horrible, the non-uniques are almost never fielded, and the set was boringly and horribly designed and executed. Who needs Sly Moore, Tion Medon, and Yuzzems lol?



2nd is probably Imperial Entanglements for me. Utterly broke competitive meta with Rieekan and made Rebels ludicrously powerful when they were already the best according to championship results.

Dash is awesome, and so is Palpy, Mice, lobot CLO, Luke, and of course the TBSV.

Really from a rare perspective it didn't suck I just hate what Rieekan did to the Meta. And the Rebels definitely didn't need a piece like Crix.

It isn't the worst set content wise just game impact wise, if Mice/TBSV weren't in it I would hate it much more.
Demosthenes
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:10:53 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/23/2009
Posts: 1,399
Location: MD
I voted Rebel Storm. I respect where the game came from, and that Rebel Storm is what SWM started with, but very few, if any, of the pieces are usable in today's game which is a major reason why (I think) I don't own a single RS piece.
slvader77
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:20:59 PM
Rank: Young Krayt Dragon
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/16/2009
Posts: 50
Location: janesville wi.
Demosthenes wrote:
I voted Rebel Storm. I respect where the game came from, and that Rebel Storm is what SWM started with, but very few, if any, of the pieces are usable in today's game which is a major reason why (I think) I don't own a single RS piece.




I understand that rebel storm has no usable pieces anymore but try playing some set only battles with it and you will see how strategic of a player you really are with out all the gimmicks that made this game so "broken" in the first place
Sithborg
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:39:55 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
slvader77 wrote:
Demosthenes wrote:
I voted Rebel Storm. I respect where the game came from, and that Rebel Storm is what SWM started with, but very few, if any, of the pieces are usable in today's game which is a major reason why (I think) I don't own a single RS piece.




I understand that rebel storm has no usable pieces anymore but try playing some set only battles with it and you will see how strategic of a player you really are with out all the gimmicks that made this game so "broken" in the first place


Not really. There are still plenty of playable minis, if not meta defining pieces from RS. Hell, I did fine with a Twilek BG in a squad when I couldn't afford a Human BG.

CS is definately the worst. Going from the best sculpts to the worst in one set. And the set didn't hold up well statwise either.
mrroboto1968
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:14:42 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/28/2009
Posts: 78
Location: moline illinois
are we talking worst playability or worst design?
kezzamachine
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:14:51 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/23/2008
Posts: 1,487
Location: Lower the Hutt, New Zealand
Couldn't ever chose Rebel Storm as the worst set. There wouldn't be a SWM without it. Sure, agreed that the pieces on the whole can't compete with prolly any other set, but it is THE set. When I first saw it, my heart skipped a beat. No other set has done that. Nothing to do with stats or sculpts. Totally pure emotional. Dang. I still look at that set with such a fondness...

...sorry, I didn't realise I was rambling there. What was the question?
Waylander311
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:37:53 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/29/2009
Posts: 89
Apart from a VERY few pieces such as Boba Fett, Commando/Scout Trooper on Speeder, and Obi-Wan; I would definately have to go with Rebel Storm. General Veers, Wampa, and Han Solo are somewhat fun at times as well, but nothing competetive. In all seriousness, none of the aforementioned figs are rarely used in any kind of serious games. Obi is just cool for the rare chance that he dies and gives up the force spirit for 38pts, when he is a decent fighter to begin with. Boba is the best sculpt for him in my opinion and decently cheap point-wise, but he lacks game changing ability big time. I would take Boba, BH, Mercenary, or Mercenary Commander over him in a heartbeat.
I thought there was definately a much larger pool of usefull characters in RoTS. Mostly R2 DOOMBOT. SO amazing and useful for 9pts.
A&E had a very balanced selection of good figs. Boba, Enforcer, STORM COMMANDO, Luke, Champion of the Force, Rampaging Wampa, Obi Spirit, MARA JADE, JEDI, and like 8 others.
Universe had only around 8 or so good pieces, but two of em alone made it worth while: Ackbar and GM Thrawn!
About 12 good minis in CS, ESPECIALLY Yoda, Darth Sidious, and Battle Droid on STAP. Also, the BEST 4pt piece in the game in my opion! That being Gran Raider. haha..
Now Bounty Hunters is worth it's weight just for BOTH Jango and Boba. Then there's bout 7 other ok-somewhat useful pieces. Rancor, Lord Vader, Young Krayt Dragon, and Mandalore the Indominable to name a few of the more significant ones.
FInaly with Clone Wars, I'm thinking of about 12 figs AT LEAST that are fun and useful. Especially out of a 40 piece set. It would get my vote for BEST from the ones you listed, and surprised to see it on here as an option. Come on Rex, GOWK, Sidious Holo, Durge, JH, Grievous, DAC, YOBUCK...the Star Corps are one of the better uncommons to date. Amazing set. Still from allllll sets, it's a toss up between Champions of the Force, Force Unleashed, and Imperial Entanglements..
My last rant/opinion/thought/suggestion(even though it doesn't matter anymore now): Compromise with 50pc sets. 60 was hard to finish, and got fustrating. While 40 was just waaaay too easy to get everything and many doubles too quickly. I believe the switch from 60 to 40pc, combined with the HUGE lack of support and advertising were the biggest contributing factors to the death of my favourite game I ever played. So yeah if anyone actually read my rants, I'd be both surprised and impressed...
erictedders
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:58:34 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2010
Posts: 253
Location: NJ
Apart from DVJH, Nom, GA Thrawn, Warmaster, and maybe Han Hero and Xizor; yeah, Universe was just bad. Most of the characters that were good were easily outdated and only moderately useful against the metas.
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:26:55 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
Clone Wars.

Yobuck, Rex, Lancers.

Also I think the Riekaan compliants come from a failure to recognize that the fact that he is costed so low means that he was meant to be easily accessible, which then leads to him essentially redefining the Rebel faction into something that more suits their identity (hit and run tactics). So what if he makes the Rebels even more powerful? The rebel faction is full of the heroes that are the the faces of Star Wars. Surem Vader might be the individual that is the Star Wars character. But the heroes from the OT aren't far behind. I hate the whininess of C-3P0 and Luke. I like KotoR more than I like Empire Strikes Back. But, I totally understand that the Movie factions and characters get the most love, because they are the real Star Wars. I don't like it all that much (37 points for that crap they call Carth Onasi?), but it does make sense.
Dr. Destructo
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:33:42 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/26/2009
Posts: 272
RoTs, the only set that I have never bought a booster from. Only a very select few minis are any good in it, and most are total crap.
SquelchDog
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 4:52:36 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/2/2009
Posts: 1,686
Location: New York, Albany Just south of Darth Maul's House
Me, I like them all. Smile I don't dislike any of them. So I won't vote, but I would like to comment. We haven't gotten into the tournament's yet. We play using the Ultimate Missions Guideline's. In my opinion "Door Lock out" Is kinda lame. ThumbDown So we use the guideline about damaging wall's and such.

However if we did play tournament rule's I'd have to agree with a lot of what joelker41 said. Well said Joel. Wink Square bases?!?! I wouldn't care if they were kriffing triangle's or hexagon's. RollEyes

P.S. The only thing that irks me is that we have all these New Clone Wars set's without Destroyer Droids. Confused
saeseetiin
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:24:10 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/8/2009
Posts: 585
Location: New York City
It is hard to say what the worst set is but I can't see how anyone thinks IE is one of them. There are characters from that set in allot of squads I find that set very useful when I build Reiken is costed to low but Thrawn is a beast so it kind of made up for it. But in clone wars Yobuck made sure allot of squads were unusable and so did the lancer.RotS was good when it came out but as the game went on the guys just started to suck compared to the new things.I love RS but I rarely ever use any of the figs from that set.BH was a very cool set with Han Scoundrel,Lord Vader and all the hunters and some Mandos but all of the DT bounty hunters are better then the old ones except maybe 4- lom.I just think that even when this last set comes out it might make some of the old stuff seem more useless.I am not going to vote we still have 1 more set and you might have to put it up there stupid Denjerik things what ever there called it makes me mad they they take up 8 spots in the last set.I'm really hoping that they don't suck.
PhageLab
Posted: Friday, March 19, 2010 12:45:20 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/27/2008
Posts: 214
A&E. Not because of square bases. Because of the total waste of R/VR slots. Hans and Lukes all over the place. I don't mind a remake of a character, but 3 of the same character in a set??? Ridiculous.
homestar45
Posted: Friday, March 19, 2010 3:51:54 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/23/2009
Posts: 116
Gonna have to go with Revenge of the sith. Just my opinion, but I hate a good majority of the rares. That being said though I can see debating that one of the others may be.
jawajive
Posted: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:15:17 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 61
Location: Fargo
My vote was for Revenge of the Sith. Apart from a few pieces like R2 and San. I never liked this set and didn't purchase many boosters. Although - my first VR ever was Grevious, Jedi Hunter. Very cool sculpt, not so cool stats. At first I though Quad attack was awesome. Then I'd realize that people would just move away or if they did stand and fight the +10 would miss most of the time.

I find I'm using pieces from A&E more often than ever before with Lando, Mara, the various Lukes and Vader.

Rebel Storm pieces just need a small upgrade. That's all. Last week I played a tourny with RS Boba. Got lots of praise for using an "old" piece. He tore it up.

Universe still rocks too! Kyle Katarn just needs a little help.
DarthJak
Posted: Friday, March 19, 2010 4:25:38 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/30/2008
Posts: 1,290
Location: Stow Ohio, just north of Dantooine (vacay on Ando)
no Heart for ROTS?

is it the 3 gen. grievous?
the yuzzum?

don't forget we got doombot & san hill in that setLove
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.