RegisterDonateLogin

Look sir, Milk!

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

some old questions Options
Yepa-Winga
Posted: Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:36:50 PM
Rank: Storm Commando
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/27/2012
Posts: 17
1) I've found the following entry in a very, very old FAQ. Is this still in effect?

Quote:
Q: If a character with the Mercenary ability is activated and has a legal target, he must attack before he can move. If he does not defeat this target with his attack, can he move afterward? After all, he is no longer able to attack, so having a legal target is moot, right?
A: No. A Mercenary character can begin moving only if there are no legal targets. Even though he's already attacked and can't attack again, it's still a legal target.



2) The Super Battle Droid has Synchronized Fire (Droid characters who combine fire with this character grant +6 Attack instead of +4). Does it mean, that the Super Battle Droid gains +12 Attack, if 2 Battle Droids combine fire with this Super Battle Droid?


3) The Yuuzhan Vong Subaltern's commander effect would affect the Yuuzhan Vong Elite Warriors, if the following entry would be in the glossary?

Quote:
Warrior: A Warrior is any character with the word "warrior" in its name or that has the Warrior special ability. It counts as a Warrior and can benefit from special abilities and effects that help Warriors. If additional keywords are in this character's names or special abilities, they may be combined with the Warrior keyword. For example, a Yuuzhan Vong Hunter with the Warrior special ability counts not only as a Yuuzhan Vong Hunter but also as a Yuuzhan Vong Warrior.

Quote:
Yuuzhan Vong Subaltern's CE: Allied Yuuzhan Vong Warriors within 6 squares gain Double Attack.


I hope I don't confuse nobody. THERE ISN'T THE WARRIOR ENTRY IN THE GLOSSARY!
EmporerDragon
Posted: Thursday, July 12, 2012 10:47:59 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
1) Yes. There has been no Errata to Mercenary.

2) Yes.

3) Warrior is not a defined ability. As the Subaltern's CE was made before the named/name contains clarification, it's CE is considered to effect any character whose name contains the phrase "Yuuzhan Vong Warrior". The Elite Warrior is not eligible for the CE as his name does not have that phrase in it (Elite breaks it up).

If Warrior became a defined entry (highly unlikely at this point), it would retroactively make the Elite Warrior eligible for the CE.
Yepa-Winga
Posted: Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:53:59 PM
Rank: Storm Commando
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/27/2012
Posts: 17
EmporerDragon wrote:
If Warrior became a defined entry (highly unlikely at this point), it would retroactively make the Elite Warrior eligible for the CE.

So, if the Warrior entry would be defined, would the Praetorite Vong Warrior and the Far-Outsider gain Double Attack from the YV Subaltern's CE? Because both character would count as a Warrior from the Yuuzhan Vong faction.
I ask this because I want to understand the decision why have got the Far-Outsider "Yuuzhan Vong Warrior" abililty instead of a simple "Warrior" ability. I think they really don't wanted to boost neiter the Praetorite Vong Warrior neither the YV Elite Warrior.
EmporerDragon
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:39:46 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
Yes, both those would be affected if Warrior became a defined ability.

However, the Far-outsider is already eligible for the Subaltern's CE as he counts as a character named Yuuzhan Vong Warrior.

As for why Warrior is not a defined ability: The people behind the V-sets do not want to change the characters made by WotC. This means that there will be no additional errata for pre-Vset figures or abilities. When WotC designed the Elite Warrior and the Praetorite warrior, they designed them so that the Subaltern's CE will not effect them. If they wanted the CE to work with those characters, they could have easily defined warrior or altered the names, but they didn't. The V-set people will not change that.
Yepa-Winga
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:45:55 AM
Rank: Storm Commando
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/27/2012
Posts: 17
Thanks for your quick answers.
KYLEwalker
Posted: Saturday, July 21, 2012 11:54:03 PM
Rank: Tusken Raider
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/21/2012
Posts: 4
Yepa-Winga wrote:
2) The Super Battle Droid has Synchronized Fire (Droid characters who combine fire with this character grant +6 Attack instead of +4). Does it mean, that the Super Battle Droid gains +12 Attack, if 2 Battle Droids combine fire with this Super Battle Droid?


EmporerDragon wrote:
2) Yes


Is this true? Oh no, we used this skill wrong, at all time!
Okay, what example is right?

a.) The Battle Droid attacks an enemy character, and the Super Battle Droid (with Sync.Fire) help him with the combined fire. The Battle Droid gets +6 Attack for his attack roll (by the Super Battle Droid).

b.) The Super Battle Droid attacks an enemy, and the Battle Droid combines fire. The Super Battle Droid gets +6 Attack (due to the Battle Droid helps).

Who get the +6 Attack? The character who has Sync. Fire and attacks (and others help him with combined fire), or the character who attacks and gets help from an character with Sync.Fire?

(We used example a.) at all time. So, we used this skill wrong? I don't beleive it :-o )
EmporerDragon
Posted: Sunday, July 22, 2012 1:39:45 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
It's B. The character with Synchronized Fire gets the additional bonus when the specified character combines fire with it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.