|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/27/2008
Posts: 157
|
First thing I noticed after I reattached my jaw to my face was, Darth Caedus on his card doesn't have rapport for Galactic Alliance. Is this a typo, or was the preview wrong?
And is there any other typos that should be pointed out?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/29/2011
Posts: 1,766
Location: In a sinkhole on Utapau
|
Also, Mandalore on Basilisk has a typo: The CE reads '... again adjacent allies', and it should be *AGAINST obviously.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
DarkLordVerjal wrote:First thing I noticed after I reattached my jaw to my face was, Darth Caedus on his card doesn't have rapport for Galactic Alliance. Is this a typo, or was the preview wrong?
And is there any other typos that should be pointed out? The Rapport was removed due to spacing issues. He no longer has it.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/30/2008
Posts: 1,288
|
Caedus was changed post-preview to help with card space. It's an issue we run into on occasion, and this time it happened to happen after a preview was given. It's just another reminder that previews on done during the design process, and we can still change things even after they are previewed, although we avoid it.
The Mandalore on Basilisk thing is an actual typo, though. They happen.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/27/2008
Posts: 157
|
You don't think the loss of rapport warranted the reduction of his point cost? =\
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/14/2008
Posts: 2,063
|
Another thing, which might been a mistype, was that Urai had a Synergy +2 for Fringe Users. I am assuming since it was right after Luke GH, it was a bleed over from that preview
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/30/2008
Posts: 1,288
|
markedman247 wrote:Another thing, which might been a mistype, was that Urai had a Synergy +2 for Fringe Users. I am assuming since it was right after Luke GH, it was a bleed over from that preview Yeah, that must have been a typo in the preview, he never had that. It doesn't make any sense for him as a character, either. Caedus is one of the more aggressively costed pieces in the set, and the best squads with him would never have used the Galactic Alliance characters anyway. Reducing his cost due to a loss of Rapport would have made him undercosted when played without them.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/14/2008
Posts: 2,063
|
Echo24 wrote:markedman247 wrote:Another thing, which might been a mistype, was that Urai had a Synergy +2 for Fringe Users. I am assuming since it was right after Luke GH, it was a bleed over from that preview Yeah, that must have been a typo in the preview, he never had that. It doesn't make any sense for him as a character, either. That's what I thought. I did notice this set was low on Flavor Text. Not a big deal but just an observation
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
Low on flavor text that ended up fitting on the cards. Plenty of flavor text though.
Will be on the character stat pages here once they are online.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/14/2008
Posts: 2,063
|
"Quoreal" is spelled incorrectly according Wookieepedia.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
|
Echo24 wrote:markedman247 wrote:Another thing, which might been a mistype, was that Urai had a Synergy +2 for Fringe Users. I am assuming since it was right after Luke GH, it was a bleed over from that preview Yeah, that must have been a typo in the preview, he never had that. It doesn't make any sense for him as a character, either. Caedus is one of the more aggressively costed pieces in the set, and the best squads with him would never have used the Galactic Alliance characters anyway. Reducing his cost due to a loss of Rapport would have made him undercosted when played without them. Unfortunate. I didn't know that until just now. I agree that he is aggressively costed and doesn't need a point reduction. However I disagree strongly that his best squads are not with NR. His best synergy is with shooters due to Sith Battle Manipulation. I think his best squad is (was) with Jaq, Lobot, and 3 galactic alliance special guards. Oh well He still rocks
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/23/2010
Posts: 3,562
Location: The Hutt, New Zealand
|
Caedus + Sith Bastila + support has been performing pretty well locally.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
|
TimmerB123 wrote:Echo24 wrote:markedman247 wrote:Another thing, which might been a mistype, was that Urai had a Synergy +2 for Fringe Users. I am assuming since it was right after Luke GH, it was a bleed over from that preview Yeah, that must have been a typo in the preview, he never had that. It doesn't make any sense for him as a character, either. Caedus is one of the more aggressively costed pieces in the set, and the best squads with him would never have used the Galactic Alliance characters anyway. Reducing his cost due to a loss of Rapport would have made him undercosted when played without them. Unfortunate. I didn't know that until just now. I agree that he is aggressively costed and doesn't need a point reduction. However I disagree strongly that his best squads are not with NR. His best synergy is with shooters due to Sith Battle Manipulation. I think his best squad is (was) with Jaq, Lobot, and 3 galactic alliance special guards. Oh well He still rocks Just checked, and I thought affinity was dropped too. Only rapport - not that big of a deal
|
|
|
Guest |