|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/6/2009
Posts: 191
|
If you have one enemy adjacent to you and one enemy that is one square away, can you attack either one with melee reach?
and if you have a setup like this:
A = Acklay
E = Enemy
AAA
AAAEE
AAA
can you reach over and attack the enemy that is one square away?
|
|
Rank: Sith Marauder
Groups: Member
Joined: 11/4/2008
Posts: 899
Location: Farmingdale, NY
|
Yes
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/11/2009
Posts: 1,060
Location: Lamar,Missouri
|
Yes, because both are considered adjacent for purposes of attacking, now if you didnt have melee reach youd have to attack the based up guy.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 9/23/2008
Posts: 1,487
Location: Lower the Hutt, New Zealand
|
Extra question: I don't quite understand Melee Reach 2 (and I guess Melee Reach 3...) in terms of how you count the squares away from you diagonally. How the *kriff* does that work?
|
|
Rank: Young Krayt Dragon
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/27/2009
Posts: 50
|
The same way you do for movement.
XXAXDX
XXXBCX
Assuming A has Melee Reach 2, B and D are within Reach and can be considered Adjacent while A is attacking. C is 3 squares away, and thus cannot be considered adjacent.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/11/2009
Posts: 1,060
Location: Lamar,Missouri
|
Im not sure you could attack "B" because it looks from here that they are 3 squares away, you still count diagonal squares as 2, so if your going diagonal you can only attack characters who are adjacent because they also count as being 2 squares away.
BUT, you can attack B with melee reach 3
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/9/2009
Posts: 936
Location: Southern Illinois
|
It looks to me he has it setup so that B is adjacent to A which would make it two squares away since it would be the diagonal adjacent.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 9/23/2008
Posts: 1,487
Location: Lower the Hutt, New Zealand
|
It looks like what I thought and what I've been playing so ka rawe! Tino pai rawa!
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 9/23/2008
Posts: 1,487
Location: Lower the Hutt, New Zealand
|
Plus I'm two posts ahead of my brother now...
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/6/2009
Posts: 908
Location: Felucia, near the Ancient Abyss
|
kezzamachine wrote:Plus I'm two posts ahead of my brother now... Who is????
|
|
Rank: Young Krayt Dragon
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/27/2009
Posts: 50
|
It's unfortunate that the forum software here does not allow for use of a fixed-width font. :(
In the situation I presented above, yes, B is intended to be diagonally adjacent to A.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/6/2009
Posts: 191
|
swmimperial130 wrote:kezzamachine wrote:Plus I'm two posts ahead of my brother now... Who is???? that would be me.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 9/23/2008
Posts: 1,487
Location: Lower the Hutt, New Zealand
|
I'm still two ahead...
|
|
|
Guest |