RegisterDonateLogin

So artistically done.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Anybody ever really use WOTC pieces anymore? Options
surf_rider56
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 8:10:06 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/19/2008
Posts: 1,740
Location: Orange County, CA
We played a themed game last weekend, OR vs. Sith and I swear almost nobody used any WOTC pieces except for Uggies and Mice.

I was OR and ran

33 Bastila Shan, Jedi Master
30 Arfan Ramos
28 Mira of Nar Shaddaa
25 Sylvar, Betrayed Jedi
48 Zann Consortium Defiler x2
20 Blizz
15 Momaw

I went 1-2 (1st game I was rusty as heck and rolled my usual; bad. Second game I lost a much closer one and it would've been less than 13pts if he hadn't killed Mira on the last roll. Won the last game ...)

But I digress; I saw a Boba, Lobot and that's about it. I actually miss the innocence of playing with some of those WOTC pieces. The game was so much simpler 8 -10 years ago. I found my "Ultimate Missions" books last night and it made me think about this; have we made the game too complicated? You'd almost be laughed off the map if you only fielded a WOTC squad today.
Caedus
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 8:29:41 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/20/2015
Posts: 1,243
It's just a lot of assumption from both sides from here on out. You are assuming WotC would have not done anything to make the game better. Of course, on the other side, I am assuming that WotC would have done something to make the game better. I do use some of the WotC characters because the Vsets make some of them relevant and more powerful. Think about it honestly, pieces got better and more powerful throughout the course of WotC just like they are with the Vsets. What the designers, IMHO, need to consider, is making Vset characters like Obi-Kin that make the WotC characters playable again.
pegolego
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 8:39:23 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2011
Posts: 1,766
Location: In a sinkhole on Utapau
I love a lot of what the v-sets have done, great how they've managed to make so many competitive factions. However, when I DON'T want to play a competitive game (just wanna play 200 points with my neighbors, friends, family etc.), we usually just break out some of our older favorites that WotC made. Something awesome about just putting out the same squads we did when we started; Gundark 'swarms', Bith BSVs and Fringe scum (Gotal Fringers lol), Darth Vader, Sith Lord who TERRIFIED us back in the day, an X-1 Viper in any given squad, Republic Commandos and General Windu, the old terrible Grievouses (Wheel Bike?) with RotS Bodyguard Droids and whatever Droid support you feel like that day... Even Universe Luke, JM (sometimes against Tsavong Lah and YV Warriors lol). Just whatever pieces were in our limited collections when we stared mostly. Don't worry about Tempo control, no need for lots of override, no stressing over gambit. If we're playing a CASUAL game, we go all out to make it that way lol.

The v-sets in my opinion are the only reason there is a competitive scene for this game now, but anytime I just wanna have a relaxed casual game, they are a bit difficult to keep up with, having so many different options each with so many different and new abilities, which takes away a lot of the 'relaxation' and 'fun' for such matches. So in those cases, we rarely pull out any v-set stuff.

So, v-sets: Awesome! Casual games WITHOUT v-sets: Simpler and ALSO awesome. Sure, the teams have less variance, and one may be better than the other, but there's also less unwinnable matchups (less rock paper scissors etc.) ThumbsUp

Just my opinion BlooMilk
surf_rider56
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 8:41:57 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/19/2008
Posts: 1,740
Location: Orange County, CA
Caedus wrote:
It's just a lot of assumption from both sides from here on out. You are assuming WotC would have not done anything to make the game better. Of course, on the other side, I am assuming that WotC would have done something to make the game better. I do use some of the WotC characters because the Vsets make some of them relevant and more powerful. Think about it honestly, pieces got better and more powerful throughout the course of WotC just like they are with the Vsets. What the designers, IMHO, need to consider, is making Vset characters like Obi-Kin that make the WotC characters playable again.


I remember talk about a piece that would make the old Jedi Masters playable, but off the top of my head I can't recall it's name or if it was for a future V-Set or what. Most, not all, of the common/uncommon pieces are unplayable today without something giving them a serious boost. Even the
pegolego
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 8:43:22 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2011
Posts: 1,766
Location: In a sinkhole on Utapau
One thing we DO use v-sets for in casual games sometimes is pick one of our favorite really powerful V-set pieces (usually with a good CE or whatever) to lead an army of some of our older scrubs, so then the squad has some more function, but it's just v-sets we're more familiar with and still mostly simple WotC stuff so it doesn't mess with the flow and casualness of the match. Sometimes we even each pull out one EPIC piece Wink
surf_rider56
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 8:49:08 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/19/2008
Posts: 1,740
Location: Orange County, CA
@ Pego

I agree with you; you can't win a competitive game without the V-Set's. I'm not a Luddite wanting to go back to the stone age's; My group just doesn't do much of the "fun" as much. It's getting too competitive. I hope people bringing in new players keep the game simple for new guys before they scratch their heads about some of those V-Set meta pieces.
TheHutts
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 12:20:35 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/23/2010
Posts: 3,562
Location: The Hutt, New Zealand
I think if you're playing or and sith, you are always going to see vset dominated squads at this point. I think it would be a different story in factions that were more favoured by wotc. Factions like Imperials, rebels, and nr tend to have a healthy helping of wotc pieces in their current top squads.
pegolego
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 1:57:36 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2011
Posts: 1,766
Location: In a sinkhole on Utapau
@TheHutts, agreed that's what I thought, as surf mentioned that they were playing Sith/OR and those were very undeveloped factions when WotC left the game.

@Surf, yeah I don't know if I'd have enjoyed it as much when my buddy got it out to get a few games in and introduce me to it if I'd had to play with all the new stuff (there were a handful of v-sets out at that point) right off the bat. His collection consisted of mostly RS-UH stuffs so there was variety and several factions, but not much really powerful stuff or complicated abilities/CEs (WotC or V-set; Strafe Attack was about the worst it got, with Basilisks lol) that could just confuse new players. Also not too much tech. A large percentage of it was just grunts and heroes I'd seen in the movies. Definitely the way I'd introduce the game if I was teaching a new player.
TheHutts
Posted: Saturday, November 21, 2015 7:24:18 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/23/2010
Posts: 3,562
Location: The Hutt, New Zealand
From NZ Championships top 4 this year:

Winner - Imperial - only v-set pieces were Imperial Governor (23 points), Marn Hierogryph (21 points), Boba AfH (50 points). So 106/200 points were WOTC.

2nd place - NR - only v-set pieces were Luke GH (48 points) and Marn Hierogryph (21 points), so 131/200 points were WOTC.

Semi-finalist - Imperial double swap - only v-set pieces were Imperial Governor, Boba AfH and Mira (28 points), so 99/200 points were WOTC.

Semi-finalist - Imperial Daala - I can't remember exactly what was in the squad, but I think it included Daala (27), GARY (16), Pellaeon (16), Needa (11), so 130/200 points were WOTC. I'm not totally sure about Pellaeon, which would make the WOTC proportion even higher.


GenCon top 4 looked a bit different - the Sith squad in the top 4 would have been almost entirely v-set.

I think the high activations were the biggest problem with last year's meta, and tempo control and Gha Nachkt's mouse dumps were the dominant mechanics, along with movement breakers.

Power creep has probably been a little more than desired in the v-sets, but the top WOTC squads, or slight variations on them, can compete if they get the correct meta. I still think there's been way less power creep from MotF to the most recent v-sets, than there was from Rebel Storm to MotF, and we're now 5 years into v-sets, so it's a similar time frame.

One thing that v-sets have done is create more extreme builds - which I guess isn't that surprising when you're trying to add more and more builds to the meta, some end up more extreme.
General_Grievous
Posted: Sunday, November 22, 2015 2:37:54 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/8/2010
Posts: 3,623
I use tons of WOTC pieces but usually boosted up by new Vset commanders. Examples: drones, battle droids, rakghouls, stormtroopers, etc...
jak
Posted: Sunday, November 22, 2015 5:24:51 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/17/2010
Posts: 3,682
Location: Beggers Canyon Tatooine
I use WotC pieces too, just not the cardsLOL
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.