|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 201
|
So heres the question when a character targets a piece adjacent to another and is missed and then uses veers commander effect will this make an attack of opportunity against this character?
Thanks in advance
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
We won't get an official answer till the sets release, but my best guess would be yes.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
I doubt we will know the answer until the rules insert and mini-faq are released.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 201
|
k thanks
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/4/2009
Posts: 303
|
I'd actually guess NO to AoO as you can say Veers is the one allowing the movement unless the miss happen to the acting character. To put it another way if the acting creature is missed I'd guess it could draw an AoO although that is likely what triggered the miss to begin with so no second AoO but if a figure is missed when it is not acting it will not draw an AoO.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
StevenO wrote:I'd actually guess NO to AoO as you can say Veers is the one allowing the movement unless the miss happen to the acting character. To put it another way if the acting creature is missed I'd guess it could draw an AoO although that is likely what triggered the miss to begin with so no second AoO but if a figure is missed when it is not acting it will not draw an AoO.
This is not so different than the Rolling Cleave/Strafe Attack interaction we have. That is allowed. An AoA is still an attack, and I would assume the CE would resolve before movement is resolved.
|
|
|
Guest |