RegisterDonateLogin

Is a one-man wrecking crew.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Minis in strange factions Options
Sashlon
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 5:21:19 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/4/2009
Posts: 518
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
The recent debate about which faction best suits Darth Vader has got me thinking about all the other minis in wierd or unlikely factions.

I can think of:

Lumiya (why Sith instead if Imperial)
Yoda, Force Spirit (why New Republic affinity?)
Darth Sidious, Sith Master (Huh? This one makes my head hurt)
Gha Nachkt (Why not a Separartist?)
Kreia (Fringe? Why not Sith?)
Darth Caedus (He led the GA which in minis terms is NR)
Aurra Sing, Jedi Hunter (Why wasn't she Fringe?)

What others bother you?
Segastorm
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 5:40:13 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/9/2010
Posts: 658
Location: West Bend, Wisconsin
Darth Maul, Sith Apprentice, I never got why there was a sith darth maul.
Azman
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 7:31:21 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/6/2010
Posts: 409
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Sidious hologram... should be seps
dreadtech
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 7:47:20 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/23/2008
Posts: 942
Tallon Karde, He was never NR, He may of helped them from time to time but he's only loyalty was to he's own group of smugglers and only help the new republic when it was beneficial to him or he was been payed.

as for Gha Nachkt that is mentioned in post 1, he should be fringe as he also never was a Sep, think of him like the bounty hunters who did jobs for the empire, so they collected bounties for the empire, does that make the imperials? Not to me and Gha Nachkt was them same for Seps.
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 7:52:46 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
Azman wrote:
Sidious hologram... should be seps


#1 on my list.
Darth O
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 11:52:05 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/30/2009
Posts: 1,389
Location: New Zealand ( kind of by Australia)
Lando's should be Rebel with Imperial affinity; same with Han I reckon. Ewoks should be Rebel. And Vader should be Vong :P
billiv15
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 12:43:45 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/4/2008
Posts: 1,441
Let's see how I do answering some of these (or at least explaining).

Lumiya (why Sith instead if Imperial) - No idea, agree this one was probably a mistake on some level. But if I had to guess, Rob stuck with the Traditional "Imperials" of the era and just stuck her in Sith.

Yoda, Force Spirit (why New Republic affinity?) - After his death at the age of 900 years old, Yoda retained his individuality in the Force. As a so-called Force ghost, he would look down on Leia and the Solo twins when they were first born. His teachings would become the basis for what Luke taught his New Jedi Order. Since Yoda's teachings to Luke were rushed, most teachings of the Jedi Order were lost until the New Jedi Order began to find ancient holocrons, or, in some cases, libraries like the one on Ossus.

Darth Sidious, Sith Master (Huh? This one makes my head hurt) - He was the apprentice of a Sith Lord, killed him, took his place, and built his own empire. He used any group of people to get what he wanted (i.e. Republic, Separatists - then finally Imperial). Before any of those, he was also a Naboo Senator and instigated a war via a group called the Trade Federation on his own planet to gain power in the Republic. I can perhaps agree that the abilities of this particular figure don't necessarily match, but that's a pretty small point. This one represents a pre-Episode I Sideous for the most part.

Gha Nachkt (Why not a Separartist?) - Umm, let's not get started on how bad of a character Gha was, or pretend that if he was a Sep figure only, that this would have made his stat set better :). Needless to say, a guy with one episode of Clone Wars hardly tells you which side he was on. All he did was work for the Seps for a really short time right? More like a hired grunt for a job, then he was offed :)

Kreia (Fringe? Why not Sith?) - Because as "Kriea" she was not Sith, but a companion of a fringe or lightside Exile and others. She was Sith in hiding as Kriea. Darth Traya is her as a Sith, just as Palpatine is Imperial and Republic, while Sideous is Separatist and Sith.


Darth Caedus (He led the GA which in minis terms is NR) - Because him fighting alongside the New Republic character is so much more wrong than the Sith faction that it's not funny. The mistake here was not DC exactly, as much as it was not giving GA characters affinity for him. He should not have been NR in any way.

Aurra Sing, Jedi Hunter (Why wasn't she Fringe?) - This goes right back to the argument made with Gha - The reverse applies here. She was hired by the Seps to do a job. You can't argue that Gha should be Sep, and that Aurra should be fringe, that's illogical.

Darth Maul, Sith Apprentice - Because he was dead long before the formation of the Separatist army, so Rob decided to make one version for the Sith faction representing his pre-Episode I self - same as Darth Sideous Sith Master.

Sidious hologram... should be seps - Same as Maul and Sideous SM. This character represents a figure (from episode I) that existed long before the Seps. But with that said, the answer here is simple. Rob said, "it was overlooked". :)
Rikalonius
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 12:55:19 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/20/2010
Posts: 109
I think there is definitely something to be said for making Gungans Republic, but Ewoks Fringe. The Gungans had no representation in the Republic until after the battle. Maybe because they did have a voice after, but maybe the Ewoks sent a rep to the New Republic, it is never talked about. Gungans should be represented as fringe because that's how they were brought into the battle, as a separate entity. The NSF was part of a government who were answerable to the Republic Senate, just like any world with a Senator.
CerousMutor
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 1:58:22 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/27/2008
Posts: 990
Darth O wrote:
Lando's should be Rebel with Imperial affinity; same with Han I reckon. Ewoks should be Rebel. And Vader should be Vong :P


LOL
gwek
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 2:02:58 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/7/2008
Posts: 400
Personally, I think that WotC dropped the ball with some of the KotOR/KotORII characters. Kreia as Fringe doesn't bother me, but I would argue that Atton Rand and Mira should have been Fringe, too, whereas Mission Vao, Zaalbar, Juhani, Jolee Bindo, and probably even Zayne Carrick should have been Republic.

I suspect that in most of these cases, game balance and/or popularity issues took priority over character accuracy.

Atton Rand: Although he would appear to canonically redeem himself, Rand was originally a member of the Sith faction, and will also stick with the Exile if she goes dark side. Given the role he plays within the game, it seems to be that he should be Fringe, or Old Republic with Sith Affinity.

Visas Marr: Speaking of Sith Affinity, I think she should have had it. Or perhaps more accurately, Sith faction with Old Rep affinity.

Mira: Although Mira is technically a "light side" character (in that Hanharr will join instead if your too dark when you meet them), Mira has no problem sticking with the Exile if she turns to the dark side, and although she's a good-hearted mercenary, she's a mercenary. I think she should have been Fringe.

Mission Vao, Zaalbar, Juhani, and Jolee Bindo all fall into basically the same category, which I will, for lack of a better term call "I'll never join the dark side!" Although all of them are TECHNICALLY "Fringe" (in that they operate outside the Jedi order and/or are not regular Old Republic citizens), NONE of them will support an evil Revan, and most will turn on him in combat. At worst, Mission and Zaalbar are as "Fringe" as Han and Luke, and although Juhani and Jolee operate outside the Jedo order proper, they are comparable to "indepedent Jedi" like Ferus Olin, Rahm Kota, and Jax Pavan (none of whom are Fringe, and all of generally support their own personal take on the Jedi ideals).

Similarly, I think Zayne Carrick falls into the same category of "indy Jedi." Despite Miller's teases potentially tying him to various Sith lords, his story is always really about success vs failure, not light vs dark, so he lacks even the flirtation with the dark side of a character like Ferus Olin. Carrick may consort with criminals, but he's ALWAYS on the side of angels. To me, that says Old Rep, not Fringe.
Sithborg
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 2:24:10 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
gwek wrote:
Similarly, I think Zayne Carrick falls into the same category of "indy Jedi." Despite Miller's teases potentially tying him to various Sith lords, his story is always really about success vs failure, not light vs dark, so he lacks even the flirtation with the dark side of a character like Ferus Olin. Carrick may consort with criminals, but he's ALWAYS on the side of angels. To me, that says Old Rep, not Fringe.


I don't see it. Especially with how KOTOR ended. He's not a Jedi, despite his training. He doesn't serve the Republic. He is there to help people, on either side. And he is willing to work with various people to do it. Fringe isn't just for the criminals. Early on, perhaps he should've been OR. But pretty much after the Covenant, he is Fringe.
Sashlon
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 2:24:38 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/4/2009
Posts: 518
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
billiv15 wrote:

Darth Caedus (He led the GA which in minis terms is NR) - Because him fighting alongside the New Republic character is so much more wrong than the Sith faction that it's not funny. The mistake here was not DC exactly, as much as it was not giving GA characters affinity for him. He should not have been NR in any way.


See, I disagree.

I think having Caedus with Malak and Exar is far more messed up than teaming him with NR figs.

But I would have given him some kind of 'anti afinity' for unique NR force users and the Solos. IDK, I think it would have been better. The new Ben Skywalker and Darth Caedus should be able to be played together, they worked closely together in the LOTF series even though Ben didn't fully understand what was going on.

He maybe more than any other mini is incredibly hard to place.
billiv15
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 3:05:18 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/4/2008
Posts: 1,441
Sashlon wrote:

I think having Caedus with Malak and Exar is far more messed up than teaming him with NR figs.

But I would have given him some kind of 'anti afinity' for unique NR force users and the Solos. IDK, I think it would have been better. The new Ben Skywalker and Darth Caedus should be able to be played together, they worked closely together in the LOTF series even though Ben didn't fully understand what was going on.

He maybe more than any other mini is incredibly hard to place.


Remember, this is Darth Cadeous we are talking about. The one that already killed Mara, and the one that's going to fight Jaina. Was Ben working with him after he became DC? I can't honestly remember. Either way, I see way more problems with DC being played with Luke, Mara, Jaina than with Malak :) Malak as an example, is no more problematic with DC than say with Boba Fett BH - never happened, couldn't happen without a time machine or a clever comic advertisement, but could be fun. Playing him with Mara just seems wrong :)
Sashlon
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 3:06:48 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/4/2009
Posts: 518
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
hence my anti-affinity idea lol

I love these arguementsBlooMilk
billiv15
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 3:17:14 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/4/2008
Posts: 1,441
Sashlon wrote:
hence my anti-affinity idea lol

I love these arguementsBlooMilk


The problem with anti-affinity is that it was never done in a well thought out manner (see Kota as the major example).

What I mean by this is that WotC took the easy way out, making the character one faction, and not allowing the affinity to work if such and such was in the squad.

In this case, you are arguing for a NR character in an NR squad, but can't be if X is in the squad - that's entirely different. We have 0 cases of any in faction characters that cannot be in a squad with anyone else in their own faction.

But the point is made by both of us respectively. DC doesn't fit the NR or the Sith well, but certainly I'll bet we can both agree he wasn't a fringe figure either. So of the two options, Rob had to pick one, and I'm guessing, but I'd say he thought playing with Mara and Jaina was much more the lesser of two evils. As to what happened with the GA affinity, like I said, bet they just "overlooked" it :)
Sashlon
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 3:27:01 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/4/2009
Posts: 518
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
yeah Caedus is kind of a Pandora's box lol
Rikalonius
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 4:12:10 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/20/2010
Posts: 109
billiv15 wrote:
Remember, this is Darth Cadeous we are talking about. The one that already killed Mara, and the one that's going to fight Jaina. Was Ben working with him after he became DC? I can't honestly remember. Either way, I see way more problems with DC being played with Luke, Mara, Jaina than with Malak :) Malak as an example, is no more problematic with DC than say with Boba Fett BH - never happened, couldn't happen without a time machine or a clever comic advertisement, but could be fun. Playing him with Mara just seems wrong :)


I have to agree with Bill. There is already two Jacen Solo to represent his affilation to the NR. Now, he is Darth Caedus, enemy of the New Republic, and it wouldn't make sense to me to have be able to play among them. Essentially, to beat a dead Bantha, it's a matter of light side versus darkside. Fringe are fringe because not because they are criminals, but because they would work for either side. Maybe if the Empire had treated the Ewoks better, they would have sided with the Empire, I mean they were going to eat the heroes.


CerousMutor
Posted: Saturday, February 5, 2011 7:16:51 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/27/2008
Posts: 990
But even as Caedus he work from within the New Rebuplic. He is a very different in each book, its only towards the end when he kind of seems balanced as a Darth/Sith.

You cant really have a Caedus form each book, but he goes proper poper crazy in one of them! I remember reading it thinking he's totally lost it!

Yep he is a tough one, lets leave him over the corner for later lol
gwek
Posted: Sunday, February 6, 2011 12:54:22 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/7/2008
Posts: 400
Sithborg wrote:
gwek wrote:
Similarly, I think Zayne Carrick falls into the same category of "indy Jedi." Despite Miller's teases potentially tying him to various Sith lords, his story is always really about success vs failure, not light vs dark, so he lacks even the flirtation with the dark side of a character like Ferus Olin. Carrick may consort with criminals, but he's ALWAYS on the side of angels. To me, that says Old Rep, not Fringe.


I don't see it. Especially with how KOTOR ended. He's not a Jedi, despite his training. He doesn't serve the Republic. He is there to help people, on either side. And he is willing to work with various people to do it. Fringe isn't just for the criminals. Early on, perhaps he should've been OR. But pretty much after the Covenant, he is Fringe.


And the version we have from KotOR appears to from fairly early in his career. :)

Honestly, though, I think you may be over-simplifying the matter. One of the recurring themese of the KotOR comic relates to the nature of the Jedi and the question of "What is it to be a Jedi?" Krynda's Covenant is a different "take" than the Revanchists, and both are different that the "baseline" Jedi, as represented by Vrook and Vandar. Zayne Carrick is simple another version of what it is to be a Jedi.

In terms of helping people "on either side," sure, he'll ally with the Mandalorians briefly, but I don't see that as anything different than someone like Kenobi being willing to ally with a neutral party for the greater good. Heck, in the current FotJ series, Luke Skywalker is working alongside Sith, but that doesn't change his faction.

Having said all that, though, I have to admit that I was much more inclined to agree with your viewpoint prior to the DARK TIMES set. Virtually everything you've said about Zayne can be applied to Jax Pavan, Ferus Olin, and Dass Jennir, yet not a one of them is Fringe.
creme_brule
Posted: Sunday, February 6, 2011 6:39:02 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/31/2009
Posts: 1,701
why is han NOT fringe??? Like FOR REALS?????? The biggest joke ever is (rebel) han smuggler's flavor text: 'Im not in this for your revolution ; princess'. LOL

on a side note why kkruck (DT) didnt have avoid defeat and why BOTH kkrucks didnt have affinity for NR is beyond me. Same with why kazdan has affinity for rebels.....
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.