|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/25/2011
Posts: 806
Location: Wisconsin
|
I just noticed the Kyp Duron Jedi Master CE says "Pilot allies get +3 attack and -3 defense". I figured it was a typo but the character page here shows it the same way. So is it indeed a misprint or is Kyp trying to get his friends killed easier?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/30/2008
Posts: 2,093
|
it is a negative to defense. It is meant to represent the fact that Kyp was very offensive and not much worried about defense.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/13/2012
Posts: 143
Location: Southern Wisconsin
|
Any PDFs yet? (Just getting a little anxious to get my hands on this batch)
Thanks
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 8/9/2009
Posts: 1,935
|
The PDF has been posted to SWMresources
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/30/2008
Posts: 1,288
|
Galactic Funk wrote:I just noticed the Kyp Duron Jedi Master CE says "Pilot allies get +3 attack and -3 defense". I figured it was a typo but the character page here shows it the same way. So is it indeed a misprint or is Kyp trying to get his friends killed easier? He leads all the other pilots to be very aggressive and not worry about defense. That's the kind of leader he was, just ask his Dozen-and-Two Avengers.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/14/2009
Posts: 1,728
|
Echo24 wrote:Galactic Funk wrote:I just noticed the Kyp Duron Jedi Master CE says "Pilot allies get +3 attack and -3 defense". I figured it was a typo but the character page here shows it the same way. So is it indeed a misprint or is Kyp trying to get his friends killed easier? He leads all the other pilots to be very aggressive and not worry about defense. That's the kind of leader he was, just ask his Dozen-and-Two Avengers. First you'll have to find a medium.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/13/2012
Posts: 143
Location: Southern Wisconsin
|
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/28/2009
Posts: 414
|
Galactic Funk wrote:The Celestial Warrior wrote:markedman247 wrote:Is Alto Stratus supposed to have a Lightsaber? It was such a pain in the ass to make sure to include Lightsaber or Lightsaber Force Powers when designing that I made the following adjustment in the Floor Rules to help out: • For the purpose of counting as having a lightsaber refer to the stat card. If the card has the Lightsaber Special Ability, a Force Power with the word “lightsaber” or the card image itself depicts a lightsaber then the figure is considered to have a lightsaber. In the case of a minature (including Recommended miniature) having a lightsaber but not meeting the above criteria then it is not counted as having a lightsaber. But the problem is that if you look at his wookiepedia page it looks rather obvious that he shouldn't have a lightsaber for any reason. He is not a force user and therefore has none of the other trademarks of having a lightsaber. It appears that the image depicted on the card was a mistake and he should have had the lightsaber removed. Can a designer please chime in and clarify. Its an easy (although unfortunate) errata if that is the way it needs to go. I would hate for him to have to continue on w/ a lightsaber if he really isn't supposed to have one. He will be errata'd to not count as having a lightsaber.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
The Celestial Warrior wrote:Galactic Funk wrote:The Celestial Warrior wrote:markedman247 wrote:Is Alto Stratus supposed to have a Lightsaber? It was such a pain in the ass to make sure to include Lightsaber or Lightsaber Force Powers when designing that I made the following adjustment in the Floor Rules to help out: • For the purpose of counting as having a lightsaber refer to the stat card. If the card has the Lightsaber Special Ability, a Force Power with the word “lightsaber” or the card image itself depicts a lightsaber then the figure is considered to have a lightsaber. In the case of a minature (including Recommended miniature) having a lightsaber but not meeting the above criteria then it is not counted as having a lightsaber. But the problem is that if you look at his wookiepedia page it looks rather obvious that he shouldn't have a lightsaber for any reason. He is not a force user and therefore has none of the other trademarks of having a lightsaber. It appears that the image depicted on the card was a mistake and he should have had the lightsaber removed. Can a designer please chime in and clarify. Its an easy (although unfortunate) errata if that is the way it needs to go. I would hate for him to have to continue on w/ a lightsaber if he really isn't supposed to have one. He will be errata'd to not count as having a lightsaber. I have noted this in the flavor text area on his character page.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/14/2008
Posts: 2,063
|
swinefeld wrote:The Celestial Warrior wrote:Galactic Funk wrote:The Celestial Warrior wrote:markedman247 wrote:Is Alto Stratus supposed to have a Lightsaber? It was such a pain in the ass to make sure to include Lightsaber or Lightsaber Force Powers when designing that I made the following adjustment in the Floor Rules to help out: • For the purpose of counting as having a lightsaber refer to the stat card. If the card has the Lightsaber Special Ability, a Force Power with the word “lightsaber” or the card image itself depicts a lightsaber then the figure is considered to have a lightsaber. In the case of a minature (including Recommended miniature) having a lightsaber but not meeting the above criteria then it is not counted as having a lightsaber. But the problem is that if you look at his wookiepedia page it looks rather obvious that he shouldn't have a lightsaber for any reason. He is not a force user and therefore has none of the other trademarks of having a lightsaber. It appears that the image depicted on the card was a mistake and he should have had the lightsaber removed. Can a designer please chime in and clarify. Its an easy (although unfortunate) errata if that is the way it needs to go. I would hate for him to have to continue on w/ a lightsaber if he really isn't supposed to have one. He will be errata'd to not count as having a lightsaber. I have noted this in the flavor text area on his character page. Poor Alto. Jedi took his planet. Now the makers take his lightsaber away. :P
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
|
So the Sith Pawn has a lightsaber?
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
Yes.
A note. I should have the FAQ/Errata up by tomorrow.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/30/2008
Posts: 2,093
|
Yes
|
|
|
Guest |