I agree with Bill. "Can" and "Should" are two very different things. Yes, you CAN give Boba BH a bunch of extra attacks to make him more brutal. But SHOULD you? What sacrifices do you have to make to do it?

I mean i would say deff keep BH, he's hard to get, also any player regardless of there skill level can destroy a squad with a good roll streak with him. You can ruin someones whole team with 1 roll of the dice against there top piece.

Mercenary is good & all but as someone pointed out for a few more pts you can get BH, merc got intuition & can get twin attack But BH is BH. also Enforcer is a beast too for his low pt cost & his abilities. Put him on Rep with tarpals & do abilities replacing attacks twice, or Yularen can give him opp.

I agree that they all have different uses & skills on a givin team.

Now Boba MC even though his stats are amazing, & i think if he was fringe would be by far the best boba IMO. Problem is his CE stops him from gaining twin from the Mando Captain, & i feel theres alot more better ways to go with Mando's, plus you can always bring in fringe pieces with accurate. But again comes to the point of they all have there uses.

But if i had to get rid of one i would say Boba from Rebel Storm.

To be perfectly honest i think it depends on your playing style.

If you play mando's then kept mercenary commander. However if you want the best fett by his self with out help from other pieces then bounty hunter is the right one. Mercenary is good, although to be honest with you i don't really like him that much. I like the quote that was said about how BH wins games yet mercenary teaches you how to win them, haha

It's funny to me because it's true. BH is good for unexperienced plays. However don't knock Mercenary because he doesn't have mobile and evade. Boba Mercenary if played with the right support pieces can become way more deadly then BH for a lot cheaper to. Young Mercenary sucks, thats an easy one. As for Boba Fett he used to be the best piece yet he's died with time. Although he still has the cool sculpt.

I think that breaks it down preety good, my favorite fett is mercenary commander, plus once you really break it down i think he's better then bounty hunter also.
I think he's the best even tough he's on mando's because he's a better version of mercenary, and he's cheaper. He has double which is better then twin, plus he has greater mobil as opposed to just mobile. He doesn't have bounty hunter and flamethrower. However missiles 30 and penetration 10 are far better in my eyes. WHo could forget the fact that he doesn't have the big D, Disinegration. He does have cunning though which makes his attack 17 and damage 30. BH can't have more then 20 damage. People knock him for being Mandalorian, and to be truthfull i disagree. I like him mandalorian. He makes his scout and gunslinger friends just so more dangerous with accurate. I'm not saying that there tier-one i know there not, but there my favorite fraction so i play them the most and at tournaments anyways. Plus it's great to beat people with mando's because not alot of people play them in a competative tournament. Plus its so rewarding to kill all those darn rebels or droids with true warriors. Thats what i think anyway.

I don't think there really is one fett that is hands down the best no questions asked, i really think that its up to one's own play style.

Are you hinting at any ideas you have for Mandos in the first Vset? ;)

Wise words

Except you will do much better with Cad Bane in Boba's place, for cheaper. For that matter, Dash, Atton, Czerka is also better. You are spending 80pts to get Boba to an accurate shooting Cad Bane. That's hardly worth it. I know if given the option to spend 24pts on a commander (who did nothing else mind you) simply to give Cad Accurate shot, there is no way I would do it. I'd just save the points, use Cad, and get the extra 2 shots per round instead. Especially since those extra points likely get me Dash in there as well. You tell me, which build is better. Yours? Or the following?

--Exile Interference--
54 Cad Bane
49 The Jedi Exile
28 Dash Rendar, Renegade Smuggler
54 Jedi Battlemaster x2
6 Mouse Droid x2
9 Ugnaught Demolitionist x3

(200pts. 10 activations)

I've had some success with this Boba/Mando build here, what do you guys think?

--Man(do) Love--
57 Boba Fett, Mercenary Commander
26 Mandalorian Quartermaster
23 Mandalorian Captain
57 Mandalorian Scout x3
17 Mandalorian Gunslinger
8 R7 Astromech Droid
9 Mouse Droid x3
3 Ugnaught Demolitionist

(200pts. 12 activations)

Great squads, I've run similar if not same in the past. Not at tournaments, just casual play with my buddy. Fun to play. And of course the cloaked scouts make it annoying for the opponent.

Yep. If you have options to hit the enemy with heavy damage regardless of whether they out-activate you, you overcome the Mando weakness to activation control. It simply doesn't MATTER if your opponent out-activates you if you have the capabilities to hit them hard in any situation.

@Rogue: Who ever said that you SHOULD spread out? In a game in which damage concentration is key, splitting your forces usually is more of a liability than a benefit. You can have SOME separation. The key to using the Czerka is good positioning and that is learned through experience.

I prefer the Captain to the Czerka for the HPs and the fact he can shoot, but I can see a very compelling argument that in a meta rife with Twin attack that a Cad Bane with Opportunist (just as an example) spends the same cost in damage potential to hit a Czerka once and losing a Twin as they do hitting a Captain twice for the kill. It is the same cost to the Cad player. So, given that Czerka costs less, can also give the Jolt benefit, and the only other drawback is a need for good positioning, that could be a better choice for a very experienced player, depending upon personal preference.

I added to my original post with a further explanation. It may be personal preference based upon play style and experience. My point is that there are options, and that one shouldn't discount a choice just because its different or requires a more (or less) sophisticated strategy or set of tactics.