RegisterDonateLogin

Otoh Gunga style

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Poll Question : what would weaken rebels most
Choice Votes Statistics
take riekan away 23 32.857142 %
take dodonna away 14 20.000000 %
take lukes snowspeeder away 1 1.428571 %
take the various hans away 0 0.000000 %
take a and e leia away 1 1.428571 %
other 2 2.857142 %
you dont care 29 41.428571 %

how to break those rebels Options
Gurneywars
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:30:55 AM
Rank: Dark Trooper Phase III
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2009
Posts: 25
Gurneywars wrote:
I agree with what you say dean also but I would take it a step further San Hill, Ozzel also can and have made it a rough day for the lesser factions like sith, OR etc.

Not only this but I find that outside of the evade squads this activation control tends to slow the game play way down especially if both players have it.



Lobostele wrote:
Once again, as usual, I will call you out on this. Tempo control should have NO impact on the speed of the game. It doesn't matter if you spend 30 seconds each for activating pieces on two different phases thanks to San/Ozzel/Dodonna, or if you spend 1 minute to activate two pieces in a single phase. The simple fact is, whether you have tempo control or not, it should NEVER take you longer to play your games than if you don't have tempo control. If you think tempo control is causing you or your opponent to play slower, then your problem is not tempo control, it's your play speed itself.

Don't blame tempo control pieces. Learn to play faster.

I hate to go on a rant about this, or point you out individually in it, because this applies to lots of people. I just get tired of people accusing tempo control pieces like this and using it as an excuse to play slow. It's not the piece's fault.


Well this is first time you called me out on this Laugh pretty sure anyway.

All my tournament games have finished in time usually in half the time, except on vassal. ThumbsUp

What I'm getting at is the person without will take longer to make the move for fear of making the mistake that lets person who has it kill pretty much the big beat so will count out spaces a little more. If both of you have it there is usually more communication of "what do you have left?" eating up some time. Most of this is in the first 2 rounds.

Now if you call it player problems then so be it. Those activation control pieces are still on the board causing this.
Gurneywars
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:33:43 AM
Rank: Dark Trooper Phase III
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2009
Posts: 25
LoboStele wrote:

Neither of them are a point of concern for the Rebels though, IMO. At this point, we haven't even seen a Landspeeder/Snowspeeder squad make top 4 at a Regional, have we?


Yes Lansing had snowspeeder 4th
Gurneywars
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:37:31 AM
Rank: Dark Trooper Phase III
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/5/2009
Posts: 25
dnemiller wrote:
well Aaron give that a try and let me know how it turns out.

Seriously we have scores of 50 to 37 for Regionals. We have players not complete a game in the entire Regional Tourney. So depending on being able to complete all of your games and to get your points while playing a lesser faction is a serious gamble.

Lets look at your argument that Dodonna is not a problem per Nicknames point.

You 16 activations with Dodonna and I am playing 14 Sith. My chances of ever evening out the activations are close to zero.

No Dodonna and you have 18 activations... I have to kill a couple of pieces and we are virtually even. That practically makes my point for me. You maybe outactivated without Dodonna but you can even the odds by play.

With Dodonna your chances of getting even on the activation swing are nearly impossible.

Doesnt mean Dodonna guarantees a win but over the course of a long tourney I think the odds are you fall to it sooner or later. Then having a plan to fall back on the 3/2 scoring is just as dangerous.


Why not make san hill, ozzel and dodonna work like Tarkin's los at beginning of phase to choose acts for tournament settings? or would that make to much of a change?
Sithborg
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 6:48:10 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
Ever see Veed or Tarkin or Mar Tuuk see play? That is why. Dodonna is the main problem, because Ozzel and San have drawbacks.

And I rarely go to time when playing San. I play just as quickly with him, or facing him, so yes, it is a player problem if it goes to time.

And quite honestly, the main issues that the Sith, Vong, and OR have has little to do with tempo control, as they have a lot more issues than just that.
LoboStele
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 7:07:29 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/3/2008
Posts: 584
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Gurneywars wrote:
Gurneywars wrote:
I agree with what you say dean also but I would take it a step further San Hill, Ozzel also can and have made it a rough day for the lesser factions like sith, OR etc.

Not only this but I find that outside of the evade squads this activation control tends to slow the game play way down especially if both players have it.



Lobostele wrote:
Once again, as usual, I will call you out on this. Tempo control should have NO impact on the speed of the game. It doesn't matter if you spend 30 seconds each for activating pieces on two different phases thanks to San/Ozzel/Dodonna, or if you spend 1 minute to activate two pieces in a single phase. The simple fact is, whether you have tempo control or not, it should NEVER take you longer to play your games than if you don't have tempo control. If you think tempo control is causing you or your opponent to play slower, then your problem is not tempo control, it's your play speed itself.

Don't blame tempo control pieces. Learn to play faster.

I hate to go on a rant about this, or point you out individually in it, because this applies to lots of people. I just get tired of people accusing tempo control pieces like this and using it as an excuse to play slow. It's not the piece's fault.


Well this is first time you called me out on this Laugh pretty sure anyway.

All my tournament games have finished in time usually in half the time, except on vassal. ThumbsUp

What I'm getting at is the person without will take longer to make the move for fear of making the mistake that lets person who has it kill pretty much the big beat so will count out spaces a little more. If both of you have it there is usually more communication of "what do you have left?" eating up some time. Most of this is in the first 2 rounds.

Now if you call it player problems then so be it. Those activation control pieces are still on the board causing this.


Sorry, as I was pointing out, was meaning to address everybody, not just you. You just happened to be the most recent person to post that particular sentiment. Sorry. ;)

As for Dean....we'll just have to agree to disagree, I guess. If I have a Rebel build with 18 activations and you have a Sith build with 16, yeah, it would certainly be possible for me to lose a couple of activations and then you'd be ahead in that realm. But why would I let you do that? I'd be just as protective of my activations as you would be of yours? OBVIOUSLY, without Dodonna it's better than WITH Dodonna. I'm not disputing that. All I, and Nickname, were pointing out, is that in most cases, a Sith/Mando/Vong squad would be out-activated by a good Rebel squad whether it was with Dodonna or not. Sure, it might be a bit more simple to even out those activations, but if you leave Rieekan in the mix, then most of the time the Ugos and other cheap activation fodder is using Mobile so you don't get LOS on 'em easily anyways.

Just simply saying that just removing Dodonna doesn't solve the problem entirely. Certainly makes it better, but you could still have out-activation problems.
dnemiller
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 7:38:28 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 538
Location: GC, Missouri
well then you are missing my entire point.

It is not about being activated by a couple of pieces. That is not a big deal. But effectively the way I see things is. If you have a Dodonna squad with say 14 acts and I have 14 sith pieces. You are able to move 7 pieces without any regard to my being able to respond in any fashion.

If you have 16 acts without Dodonna and I have the same 14 you get to move 2. I cannot see how you are missing the difference.

If there were pieces like Doombot and Yobuck in the 4 lesser factions this point is moot. As the ability to move 38 spaces nerfs the low hitpoints of the rebels. But since this is not true the low hitpoint of the Rebels are devastating. The longer the game goes into the alloted the time the bigger the issue will become for the player. Being as there is absolutely zero drawback on a piece like Dodonna I dont understand where you cannot see a problem. With San or Ozzel there always comes a point in a game where you are wishing you could do 2 just for that turn. Well for a cheaper cost (shocking I know) than San or Ozzel you get your wish with Dodonna.

The Mandos Pieces are very similar to the Rebels in a that they are low hit points. So when you add Dodonna in and the ability to say activate 7 - 9 pieces in a row with no response plus they already have the lancer to deal with... Can you tell me who in their right freakin mind is going to play them?????

The Sith live on huge hit points with zero deflect or evade. So when you face a faction that can cheaply get 7 activations in a row with a movement breaker like levitate. You can be looking at your big beatstick taking 120 dmg before he has a chance to even think about responding to all of that. So again if I want to gamble and think I am that lucky forget Gencon I am going to Vegas or Atlantic City.

I can go on but I think you get what I am saying.

I find the whole I will hide my pieces and so will you kind of a silly thing. There is a huge difference between 2 activation before I can move a piece again versus 7-9 pieces moving. But hey what do I know?

EDIT: But hey to prove your point that Dodonna is not a big deal. Put your argument to the test. Show up this year at Gencon play in the Championship with ZERO tempo control. None at all. No Dodonna. No San. No Ozzel. Nothing no tempo control at all. If it is not a big deal in any way for you or Nickname I will see you at the Final 8 table on Sunday.
greentime
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 8:30:34 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/23/2009
Posts: 177
dnemiller wrote:
well then you are missing my entire point.

It is not about being activated by a couple of pieces. That is not a big deal. But effectively the way I see things is. If you have a Dodonna squad with say 14 acts and I have 14 sith pieces. You are able to move 7 pieces without any regard to my being able to respond in any fashion.


Absolutely agree.

The problem isn't being outactivated by a a couple, it's being so far behind that your opponent can win the game while you sit around doing nothing. Two activations is enough, if you did everything perfectly, to shoot someone with Han, then shoot again with Leia. That's assuming there is a piece you can get LOS to, you feel safe leaving Han out in the open, etc.

With seven activations, you can override two doors open, run Han 12 to get a shot, move a mouse droid next to him, give him two shots with Leia and a Bothan Noble, then either override a door shut or use Luke to Levitate him out of LOS. That's a hell of a big difference. It also tends to exacerbate the situation. If you outactivate me by seven, you will probably be able to kill my activations a little at a time. Isn't that part of why the snowspeeder is so popular - because you can move so far out, pip something, then scoot far enough away to not get lightsabered? In that way the squad that begins up activations tends to get even further up, especially with say Sith, who are using mouse droids and ugnaughts to try and keep Darth Malak alive instead of hiding them in a corner to stay up on activations. You just get into a deeper and deeper hole.


dnemiller wrote:
If there were pieces like Doombot and Yobuck in the 4 lesser factions this point is moot. As the ability to move 38 spaces nerfs the low hitpoints of the rebels. But since this is not true the low hitpoint of the Rebels are devastating.


Even with those two, arguably the best movement breakers in the game, Rebels can keep the upper hand because of the way they are built. Let's say I tow 12, open a door, and run Yobuck around to kill stuff. Now the Rebel player, who has all of his real pieces still to go due to Dodonna, just saunters Madine over so I can't swap out and closes the door. Once I run out of pieces, he can kill Doombot at his leisure with the speeder, drop Yobuck more than a hundred health with multiple Han shots, or so on. It's kind of funny - in my experience with melee against Slow Cannon, once you get stuck in things will start to break your way. Han and Leia are fragile pieces. But getting stuck in is hard as the devil without taking high causalities along the way. Engineer's Lobot + Nute squad works on the same principle - massive activation advantage plus massive override covers up the squad's relative lack of HP and firepower.

Honestly, it's a little distressing to see that squad because it is such a massive NPE, especially on its map. How do you hide from a squad with up to six overrides and 30 activations with control? How do you make them come to you when they have piles of free shot blockers (at 28 defense, no less) you have to wade through? As much as I respect the artifice behind the squad design, it's difficult to think of anything that would be more unpleasant to lose to.
NickName
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:23:38 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/5/2009
Posts: 190
dnemiller wrote:
well Jason I will just disagree there.

I can build competitive Sith and Mando squads that sit on 14-16 activations. So you are saying that isnt enough minus Dodonna? Well I will just disagree completely with that assessment.

In the end if you think you can only go 4-3 or 5-2 at Gencon with a lesser faction versus a chance of going 7-0 or 6-1 with one of the main factions then you are going to play the main faction. Minus Dodonna you have a chance to level the playing a field some more. Kind of the same reasoning for the restricted map list isnt it? Keeping things fair and out of gimmicks or maps and leaving the win and losses to the player's abilities.


Hm. Think you're missing my point as I don't disagree the the latter paragraph. (But I do think Sith with 14-16 is not enough.)

The minor factions are clearly weaker in the top end game. However, I don't think in the theoretical situation of Dodonna not existing they'd do much better. We've already started to see exactly what I said would happen if the champs were switched to 200. The field narrows down considerably as the top players concentrate on this new format and begin isolating the power combos and dropping all the stuff that can't compete. Activation counts have crept up. Play speed has slowed down. By the time the process completes, I think we see very similar patterns to the prior 150 champs barring the slight improvement for melee due to some solid new options in the last few sets and the less punishing map list and I think that would be equally true of 150. So that's the general situation...

Now to the specifics of no Dodonna. We'll stick with your Sith example. The Sith uniques are pretty expensive and we'll assume the only reason you go Sith is to access at least one of them so it's pretty clear any top Sith squad is going to be out-activated by the top Rebel squads that easily pack in 15-20 activations and remain effective. It doesn't really matter much if you're out-activated by 2 or 7 (from your example) because only 2-3 of them really matter. That's the huge hit from Han or Luke along with the Leia/Bothan combo on it typically. The other stuff is incidental--maybe a shot from a ERC or Chewie or something--all nothing to worry about. I dispute that a Sith player can easily catch up on activations barring mistakes from the Rebel. Rebel will tend to keep his advantage because he understands the importance of that edge and doesn't tend to need to sacrifice scrubs to maintain a lead.

But that's all just theory. I don't think any faction has a significant problem competing outside the very top end of the game. At the top end removal of Dodonna would not let the minor factions compete against Rebels. It would hurt Rebels against Imp/Seps, and hurt NR against the other major factions but other factors still eliminate the minor factions from making the grade for top level play and particularly don't help them much in respect to fight Rebels--I'd argue they're helped more against NR actually in that case.

I think the answer to your final questions remains the same--while the gap may close a bit removal of Dodonna is not enough to bring these factions to the point where top players would feel confident they could go 6-1 vs 4-3 with them. They just lack too much other stuff outside of activation issues.
dnemiller
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:56:49 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 538
Location: GC, Missouri
well I guess I am missing your point because at the end of it all it sounds like instead of trying make things better we ought to just throw our hands in the air and give up on the minor factions.

well we aren't waiting on wizards to fix lazy game design anymore it is on us. So I think when we identify something that is going to effect the game we need to figure out how to get the other factions involved.

If we leave the game in its current state of rebels are everything we are going to lose players out of straight boredom.
NickName
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 11:27:40 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/5/2009
Posts: 190
Where is there anything in the conversation about "making things better" and where is there anywhere that I've said I'm opposed to making things better? :)

All I said is that the theoretical removal of Dodonna would not allow the minor factions to compete with Rebels in the current championship environment.

That's the entire extent of my point.

Removing him does not "break those rebels" as in the OP, and to be honest, I don't even agree with the premise that the rebels are the dominant faction, though they are the deepest.

I'm not advocating ANYTHING about what may or may not be done in the future, or stating any opinion one way or the other about what I personally think should change nor even saying if the metagame would be better/worse in my opinion if Dodonna never existed.

If someone asked if I think the game would be better if Dodonna never existed I would say yes, it would pretty clearly be better. But he does exist and I'm not in favor of bannings and don't think he reaches the level of ability modification that GOWK reached (ie the slipperly slope that GOWK change opponents predicted would be the eventual results of such a change to GOWK--who's next, Dodonna?)
billiv15
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 12:33:34 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/4/2008
Posts: 1,441
I think there are two separate conversations going on here. Dean is talking about V-sets, and the OP is talking about banning (even if it's just in theory). Nickname is responding to no banning, and Dean's talking about identifying problems for the lesser factions and how to address them in V-sets - which knowing the context of that conversation, I'm pretty sure Jason would be supportive of the direction being taken.

Although I still challenge anyone to a Rebels vs Mandos one on one on Vassal, as Dodonna isn't a major problem for that faction. The Lancer and Yobuck are much more of an issue for them - and that's the reason you won't see Mandos played much in the Championship - not Dodonna.

I played Mandos 2 years ago in 100pts and went 4-0 with it at Gencon. I've played them at other times at other point limits, and as long as I don't run into a well played Lancer/Yobuck I compete just fine with it. Of course that in no way means I don't think they need more figures from V-sets either. They most certainly do. But a squad of Boba MC, Scouts and Guns has 0 issue with Dodonna if it's played well.
NickName
Posted: Friday, May 14, 2010 5:54:27 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/5/2009
Posts: 190
billiv15 wrote:
Dean's talking about identifying problems for the lesser factions and how to address them in V-sets - which knowing the context of that conversation, I'm pretty sure Jason would be supportive of the direction being taken.


I've long since posted in the thread on Gamers about what I'd like to see in a V-set that an inventive way to deal with activation control (not just a NTMTO direct counter) for the factions without it would be on my list. I'm not sure how that got tangled up into a poll option called "take away Dodonna"...

I think Mandos might be able to give Kybuck a run now. But yeah, Lancer is death. Dodonna is irrelevent to their competetive hopes at the top.
TimmerB123
Posted: Saturday, May 15, 2010 2:58:58 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
I'd be surprised if rebels have more than 1 or 2 slots in the top 8.

In fact - I'll get more specific:

I would not be shocked AT ALL if rebels didn't make the top 8.



Unlike last year where there was essentially Han Smuggler/Princess Leia/Dodanna/Reeikan then add in your choice of Luke's Snowspeeder/Luke's Landspeeder/Luke Commando + Madine for 7 out of 8 squads. Then one well run creative build Republic.

Now you have legitimate contenders in 4 factions other than Rebels. Multiple builds for each faction too. While it's true that I believe every competitive Imp squad has IE Thrawn, and every NR has Ganner - the builds very greatly from there. as opposed to having 2/3 of a squad the same as everybody's and tweaking the last 1/3 - now it's 1/4 or less is set and you can go from there. Engineer proved a Lancer-less Sep squad can compete. Republic has too many tricks to name (and I could easily see a clever build like Baker's Republic one last year catching a bunch of people off guard.)

Bottom line - I could easily see 4 or 5 factions in the top 8 at GenCon, all of which different builds. Now THAT is more variety than ever before, and vastly more than last year.




Rebels aren't broken.


You want to look at what is broken (in the true meaning of the word) - look at Mandalorians, Vong, OR and Sith
dnemiller
Posted: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:08:59 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 538
Location: GC, Missouri
you know saying rebels wont make top 8 at gencon and then saying NR will is kind of silly.

NR is just an extension of the Rebels generally almost the same tech for a slightly higher cost. At times the same tech or piece. So when you mention Rebels you are talking essentially about NR too.

Judging by the squads at Owensboro I can see that Dodonna was hardly used by anyone (that is sarcasm by the way).

You will see much of the same at Kokomo also
amsnow
Posted: Monday, May 17, 2010 4:51:51 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/11/2008
Posts: 666
Location: Puyallup WA
[quote=billiv15]I think there are two separate conversations going on here. Dean is talking about V-sets, and the OP is talking about banning (even if it's just in theory). quote]


it is exactly that, theory, im not pushing for any bans here i just want everyone to know that
Weeks
Posted: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:01:34 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/23/2009
Posts: 1,195
dnemiller wrote:
you know saying rebels wont make top 8 at gencon and then saying NR will is kind of silly.

NR is just an extension of the Rebels generally almost the same tech for a slightly higher cost. At times the same tech or piece. So when you mention Rebels you are talking essentially about NR too.

Judging by the squads at Owensboro I can see that Dodonna was hardly used by anyone (that is sarcasm by the way).

You will see much of the same at Kokomo also


It kind of reminds me of last year when it was either gowk or gowk hate that seemed to be winning everything, but this year its dodonna. Now im not in favor of banning any pieces in any way. I also realize that the people who were in the finals of these tourneys most could do well with any faction.

I do think that Dodonna is an issue, if only because i believe his style of act control is wrong. There is no reason to not play dodonna in your squad, Ozzel and San both have reasons to and not to play in your squad. With San hill if your playing 12 acts there is no reason to have him, with Ozzel if your running cunning shooters there is no reason to have him. Dodonna is in EVERY rebel/NR squad because there is no way to get stuck with him, there is no counter moves you can do like you can against ozzel/san AND he is cheaper then both.

If his kind of act control is around then every faction needs some kind of act control or a counter to it. Why should i take Sith to a tourney if im trying to win it? there is no reason i would LOVE to have a meta where it really is "wide open" like its suppossibly is this year. I guess its "wide open" to any dodonna squad.

I say all this directed at the piece (dodonna) not the players who play him.
NickName
Posted: Monday, May 17, 2010 6:06:34 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/5/2009
Posts: 190
Weeks wrote:

Why should i take Sith to a tourney if im trying to win it?


With or without Dodonna, the answer to that question does not change.

"Weakened" Rebels would not allow Sith to win. It would just make Rebels and NR worse against the other good factions. Sith still lose to them, and likely still to Rebels best options sans Dodonna.
Jonnyb815
Posted: Monday, May 17, 2010 7:21:15 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/28/2008
Posts: 606
I problem with dod is the mind set people have when they play him. They are starting to use him like San squads and forget they can do two early in around. When i play imps or republic vs rebels I just set traps making people act there minis early. This works on about 85% of the players out there but there are 15% that will figure out how to not kill the piece and still keep there han or speeder unactivated.
All of the lesser factions cant set traps as good as the imps or Republic because of movement. So I think if the OR got some type of movement to go with Hoth and the Sith,Mandos got some type of CE that isnt a direct counter but works overall to counter dod like the lancer/yodabuck did to the mtb or what zuckuss can do. The OR should get some force powers and disruptive too. I really think the vong should be able to steal or borrow limited CE's.
empirejeff
Posted: Monday, May 17, 2010 9:38:51 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/4/2008
Posts: 439
People still play the SS?
Boris
Posted: Monday, May 17, 2010 10:25:23 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/18/2008
Posts: 153
I want to chime in here for a second. First let me say that the discussion seems focused on the number of "activations" as opposed to "phases." It's an important distinction, and while some of the comments seem to bare that fact in mind, I think it's worth saying out loud. A squad with 16 characters (which is different than activations, but more on that in a minute) and no tempo control piece (ie Dodonna, San, Ozzel, etc.) starts the game with EIGHT PHASES. The same squad that includes Dodonna starts the game with 16 PHASES. Twice as many. Wow. Yes, that is huge.

Secondly, when people talk about activations, they typically refer to the number of characters on a squad. That is not entirely accurate. As Nickname points out in the quoted section below, Rebels have options like the Bothan Noble that grant free attacks. This increases the activation count IMO, but is often overlooked. Consider Gray's Slow Speeder squad. He had something like 18 characters (meaning 18 phases) and in at least 2 of those phases he was making 3, possibly 4 attacks. Couple that with the fact that some of his characters have Twin and that number just goes up.

Third point, and then I'll get into addressing the actual comments is that there is another important distinction that needs to be made. Tempo control does not specifically mean Dodonna, and any counters to the concept that come about through the V-Sets, well I promise you it will not specifically target any one of those characters by name.

NickName wrote:
dnemiller wrote:
well Jason I will just disagree there.

I can build competitive Sith and Mando squads that sit on 14-16 activations. So you are saying that isnt enough minus Dodonna? Well I will just disagree completely with that assessment.

In the end if you think you can only go 4-3 or 5-2 at Gencon with a lesser faction versus a chance of going 7-0 or 6-1 with one of the main factions then you are going to play the main faction. Minus Dodonna you have a chance to level the playing a field some more. Kind of the same reasoning for the restricted map list isnt it? Keeping things fair and out of gimmicks or maps and leaving the win and losses to the player's abilities.


Hm. Think you're missing my point as I don't disagree the the latter paragraph. (But I do think Sith with 14-16 is not enough.)


Nor do I, if we are talking about the game as it exists today.

Quote:
The minor factions are clearly weaker in the top end game. However, I don't think in the theoretical situation of Dodonna not existing they'd do much better. We've already started to see exactly what I said would happen if the champs were switched to 200. The field narrows down considerably as the top players concentrate on this new format and begin isolating the power combos and dropping all the stuff that can't compete. Activation counts have crept up. Play speed has slowed down. By the time the process completes, I think we see very similar patterns to the prior 150 champs barring the slight improvement for melee due to some solid new options in the last few sets and the less punishing map list and I think that would be equally true of 150. So that's the general situation...


Actually, I don't think game speed has dropped off all that much. Most players are playing faster at 200 than they did at 150, from my experience at things like Coolecticon in November and our regional yesterday, which both events had a fairly wide field of players from a diverse area (as opposed to a regular Saturday tourney with the locals). That said, I do agree that power combos are being figured out and that is a trend we will continue to see going right up until August.

Quote:
Now to the specifics of no Dodonna. We'll stick with your Sith example. The Sith uniques are pretty expensive and we'll assume the only reason you go Sith is to access at least one of them so it's pretty clear any top Sith squad is going to be out-activated by the top Rebel squads that easily pack in 15-20 activations and remain effective. It doesn't really matter much if you're out-activated by 2 or 7 (from your example) because only 2-3 of them really matter. That's the huge hit from Han or Luke along with the Leia/Bothan combo on it typically. The other stuff is incidental--maybe a shot from a ERC or Chewie or something--all nothing to worry about. I dispute that a Sith player can easily catch up on activations barring mistakes from the Rebel. Rebel will tend to keep his advantage because he understands the importance of that edge and doesn't tend to need to sacrifice scrubs to maintain a lead.


Removing tempo control levels the number of phases, but you are correct that the Sith don't have an equivalent OR a counter to something like the Elite Rebel Commando, not even through Fringe options. Coupled with the fact that they have no way to protect themselves against a multi-range attacker like Yoda on Kybuck or the Lancer, well obviously it's going to take something more than just providing a tempo control counter. Can that happen with the game as it is if Dodonna were simply banned? Probably not? Is it something the V-Set team is aware of and working to address? Absolutely to the first half of the question and hopefully to the second half.

Quote:
But that's all just theory. I don't think any faction has a significant problem competing outside the very top end of the game. At the top end removal of Dodonna would not let the minor factions compete against Rebels. It would hurt Rebels against Imp/Seps, and hurt NR against the other major factions but other factors still eliminate the minor factions from making the grade for top level play and particularly don't help them much in respect to fight Rebels--I'd argue they're helped more against NR actually in that case.

I think the answer to your final questions remains the same--while the gap may close a bit removal of Dodonna is not enough to bring these factions to the point where top players would feel confident they could go 6-1 vs 4-3 with them. They just lack too much other stuff outside of activation issues.


Agreed. For a while I thought that General Skywalker and Yobuck were designed with tempo control counter in mind. If you can overrun the swarm before they activate, you'll be fine. But the problem is that most of those pieces move first, and spread out way too much for the Yobuck/Lancer squads to get rid of all of them, and then your opponent can still do what he/she had planned anyway since you don't have any pieces left to activate at the end of the round.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.