RegisterDonateLogin

Come on, admit it. Sometimes you think it's all right.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Super BT! Options
coffeebean
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 3:36:50 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/19/2011
Posts: 211
when you say it has been used 8 times, do you mean in combind with the faction name? or the title has been used 8 times, and the faction name being combind with it is a sererate clue?

the name Jedi Hunter has been used around 8 times but thoughout different factions.

so if i guessed "Seperatist jedi hunter" would i be using the clues correctly just with the wrong result?
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 4:43:12 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
coffeebean wrote:
when you say it has been used 8 times, do you mean in combind with the faction name? or the title has been used 8 times, and the faction name being combind with it is a sererate clue?

the name Jedi Hunter has been used around 8 times but thoughout different factions.

so if i guessed "Seperatist jedi hunter" would i be using the clues correctly just with the wrong result?


We have seen the name before but not like this.

Around 8 times

We have seen a Jedi Sith Hunter

SITH JEDI HUNTER
adamb0nd
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 5:31:26 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
OMG... its a reprint of the original sormtrooper. No Bloo Milk
swinefeld
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 6:05:32 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
adamb0nd wrote:
OMG... its a reprint of the original sormtrooper. No Bloo Milk


Correction:

Imperial Stormtrooper!

"No thanks are necessary." - The Design Team

Tongue
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 6:14:48 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
swinefeld wrote:
adamb0nd wrote:
OMG... its a reprint of the original sormtrooper. No Bloo Milk


Correction:

Imperial Stormtrooper!

"No thanks are necessary." - The Design Team

Tongue


Actually if it were named differently there might be a point lol.
Weeks
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 6:18:07 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/23/2009
Posts: 1,195
Sith.
Jedi.
Hunter.

One of these things is not like the other.
Uggie Demo
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 6:26:02 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 1,378
Location: Indianapolis
Maybe it's an improved Sith Trooper or Asassin o.o
coffeebean
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 6:28:42 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/19/2011
Posts: 211
Weeks wrote:
Sith.
Jedi.
Hunter.

One of these things is not like the other.


so does that mean 2 of them are right?
adamb0nd
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 6:35:29 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
AdmiralMotti89 wrote:
swinefeld wrote:
adamb0nd wrote:
OMG... its a reprint of the original sormtrooper. No Bloo Milk


Correction:

Imperial Stormtrooper!

"No thanks are necessary." - The Design Team

Tongue


Actually if it were named differently there might be a point lol.


Yeah!

"Imperial Stormtrooper" (Attack +22... they really are that accurate!)
R5Don4
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 7:42:07 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/27/2008
Posts: 832
adamb0nd wrote:
AdmiralMotti89 wrote:
swinefeld wrote:
adamb0nd wrote:
OMG... its a reprint of the original sormtrooper. No Bloo Milk


Correction:

Imperial Stormtrooper!

"No thanks are necessary." - The Design Team

Tongue


Actually if it were named differently there might be a point lol.


Yeah!

"Imperial Stormtrooper" (Attack +22... they really are that accurate!)


Flavour text: "Only Imperial Stormtroopers are so precise."

I'd call +22 Attack pretty precise!
Weeks
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 8:28:08 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/23/2009
Posts: 1,195
coffeebean wrote:
Weeks wrote:
Sith.
Jedi.
Hunter.

One of these things is not like the other.


so does that mean 2 of them are right?


One of them.
swinefeld
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 9:29:24 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
8 characters have the name Sith Trooper or count as Sith Trooper

Sith Advanced Trooper

hp 50
def 17
atk +7
dmg 20

special abilities
trooper
ion gun +20
squad assault

[edit: took out stuff that causes issues with the available letters]
Bob Chizo
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 10:48:19 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/9/2009
Posts: 574
Location: Keldabe, Mandalore
swinefeld wrote:
8 characters have the name Sith Trooper or count as Sith Trooper

Sith Advanced Trooper

hp 50
def 17
atk +7
dmg 20

special abilities
trooper
ion gun +20
squad assault

[edit: took out stuff that causes issues with the available letters]


Is Attack listed with the "+" or is it just the number?
swinefeld
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 11:03:09 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
Bob Chizo wrote:


Is Attack listed with the "+" or is it just the number?


It is always on the card if it is anything other than a "-".

However, it has been left out of at least one clue in previous BTs.
adamb0nd
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 11:10:01 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
swinefeld wrote:
Bob Chizo wrote:


Is Attack listed with the "+" or is it just the number?


It is always on the card if it is anything other than a "-".

However, it has been left out of at least one clue in previous BTs.


It's not always... I don't recall the piece (cw ahsoka?) But my gf pointed out that a few of the cards omitted the +. I think this was more of a typo though
swinefeld
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 11:18:40 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
adamb0nd wrote:

It's not always... I don't recall the piece (cw ahsoka?) But my gf pointed out that a few of the cards omitted the +. I think this was more of a typo though


I stand corrected. I just browsed card scans and it seems WotC dropped the + with the 40 piece sets.

The v-sets do use the +
Weeks
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 11:56:16 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/23/2009
Posts: 1,195
Attack +7 is correct from swinefelds guess.
adamb0nd
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 12:52:08 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
+7? This guy had a lot of text for a non unique scrub
coffeebean
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 1:02:02 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/19/2011
Posts: 211
adamb0nd wrote:
+7? This guy had a lot of text for a non unique scrub


the bith black sun vigo only has +6 attack and has a crap load of card text:)

has it been confirmed non-unique?
swinefeld
Posted: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 1:07:46 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
coffeebean wrote:
adamb0nd wrote:
+7? This guy had a lot of text for a non unique scrub


the bith black sun vigo only has +6 attack and has a crap load of card text:)

has it been confirmed non-unique?


yes
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.