RegisterDonateLogin

Was a good friend.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

SWMGamers Announcement about future of the game. Options
celticindian
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:22:49 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 68
Location: San Diego
No sweat.
dahatchetjeedi
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:28:59 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/22/2009
Posts: 233
Millertime wrote:
so why don't you go change your tampon and keep your conspiracy theory to yourself


bait much?
change your own...


I have been advised to inform you all that the original idea I had set well in motion is not going to work because it is evident that someone is going to ruin the possibilities of new plastic minis by the creation of "sanctioned vsets".

Thank you, I am now done with this as you people are obviously set in your ways towards vsets. I will continue to play the game the way it was ORIGINALLY made to be played and will say nothing else about it.

Just keep in mind that I DID have the answer, but I will not give it to a bunch of ingrates.

I'm going to go sculpt customs now.
have fun killing the game!
Blizzard Scout 1
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:37:01 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/24/2010
Posts: 140
Its whatever really at this point.
What if I was MDB, would it matter?
Would you all still want him banned?
Lets say I was him, would he/I ever Agree with 'certain' people taking control of our toasted game? I think not.
If you knew MDB/Sean, you would know that he would never go for any of this.
He doesn't care. He said that this would happen, and it happened.
as far as I'm concerned, hes the smartest one out of all of us by leaving this alone.
from here on in, we are going to have 3 different sects playing this game, and theres no way in Hades that this game will ever get picked up again. Because you can make Da*m sure that you guys won't be the only ones promoting ideas to Hasbro and other table top producers. with 0 solidarity with any of us together, it will be over.
celticindian
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:37:56 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 68
Location: San Diego
Holy crap! ReallY? LMFAO!
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:41:48 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
dahatchetjeedi wrote:

bait much?
change your own...
I have been advised to inform you all that the original idea I had set well in motion is not going to work because it is evident that someone is going to ruin the possibilities of new plastic minis by the creation of "sanctioned vsets".
Thank you, I am now done with this as you people are obviously set in your ways towards vsets. I will continue to play the game the way it was ORIGINALLY made to be played and will say nothing else about it.
Just keep in mind that I DID have the answer, but I will not give it to a bunch of ingrates.
I'm going to go sculpt customs now.
have fun killing the game!


The idea that V-sets will dissuade a company from picking up the game is ludicrous. Killing the game? The V-sets will, barring a miracle, be the only thing that keep this game alive. Looking at ACTUAL EVIDENCE, Star Wars gaming will move forward. In the one in a million chance that the game will get continued with the same ruleset I'm sure the gamers community wouldn't press the issue of making new cards when a company has taken it over. If the game comes back with a new ruleset, I would hope the gamers community pushes forward and develops THIS game further. If a company with extensive resources can't provide a superior product over what us group of volunteers would advance, then I don't care if it doesn't work. To blame the failure of Wizards TCG on the SWCCGPC is just morbidly stupid. If Wizards could have provided a product with a fraction of the quality and effort that SWCCG had it would likely have had some success. Stop blaming V-cards for the fact that Wizards' SWTCG sucked.
As for no one picking up Decipher's game and continuing it with the same ruleset, Wizards already was planning their game before any of us players knew that Decipher was done. Use a search engine and a calendar, that should be EVIDENCE enough to find out how things went down. By the time that MotF is released, you can bet that the plans will already be formulated as to who will producing Star Wars gaming and how it will be produced, and V-sets will have nothing to do with it. It's such a preposterously ignorant argument that I can't beleive it's much more than jsut trying to get a rise out of people.

There will be a new Star Wars game, quite different from this one. It will prosper if it deserves to, V-sets or not.
celticindian
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:43:40 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 68
Location: San Diego
You know, sticking togetjer makes us all strong. You may not have the same opinions, or same visions as others here or elsewhere, but your voice can be heard. Just keep it reasonable and void of attacks. I could care less, as I said, if you are one person or two. EVERYONE should, and will, have a voice, just be patient.
I understand your passion for this game, because it is my own. I understand your loathing for WotC (hatchet) because I never moved past 2nd E. There is a lot of sectionalism and divisiveness now, when, to make this game last, there should be a look towards unity, regardless if everyone agrees who's in harge. Look to the bright side, we're trying.
Blizzard Scout 1
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:44:52 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/24/2010
Posts: 140
celticindian wrote:
You know, sticking togetjer makes us all strong. You may not have the same opinions, or same visions as others here or elsewhere, but your voice can be heard. Just keep it reasonable and void of attacks. I could care less, as I said, if you are one person or two. EVERYONE should, and will, have a voice, just be patient.
I understand your passion for this game, because it is my own. I understand your loathing for WotC (hatchet) because I never moved past 2nd E. There is a lot of sectionalism and divisiveness now, when, to make this game last, there should be a look towards unity, regardless if everyone agrees who's in harge. Look to the bright side, we're trying.

The only one who went on the attack is you.
Now your giving advice to not do that? Are You serious?Confused
celticindian
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:06:05 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 68
Location: San Diego
You know what? You're right. I reacted to the precieved attacks I saw you launching on the community at large, especially the people who are trying to lead us forward.

Oh, wait, that wasn't precieved. I was asking for all of us to stop for a minute, look forward, and look to the people who can realistically take us there.

When I am training kick boxers (3 BB's here ) and I have the chance for Anderson Silva to come in for a session, I jump at it. I don't care how bad you think you are ( I am including me in that ) there is always someone badder. I spent years jumping out of planes, perfecting my shot, learning and training MMA, then I met a 65 year old man, John. Most peaceful guy you could ever meet. My height, 6'5, outweighed me by about 40 pounds. Nice, peaceful, fun, calm. Ex Navy seal, multiple tours in Viet Nam, great shot, knife expert. Point is, wait.
Blizzard Scout 1
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:13:48 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/24/2010
Posts: 140
celticindian wrote:
You know what? You're right. I reacted to the precieved attacks I saw you launching on the community at large, especially the people who are trying to lead us forward.

Oh, wait, that wasn't precieved. I was asking for all of us to stop for a minute, look forward, and look to the people who can realistically take us there.

When I am training kick boxers (3 BB's here ) and I have the chance for Anderson Silva to come in for a session, I jump at it. I don't care how bad you think you are ( I am including me in that ) there is always someone badder. I spent years jumping out of planes, perfecting my shot, learning and training MMA, then I met a 65 year old man, John. Most peaceful guy you could ever meet. My height, 6'5, outweighed me by about 40 pounds. Nice, peaceful, fun, calm. Ex Navy seal, multiple tours in Viet Nam, great shot, knife expert. Point is, wait.

Great Resume.
I formerly Kick Boxed Myself.
But that has absolutely nothing to do with the price of eggs in China.
I didn't attack the community.
Dean attacked me ranting about Me trying to get people to Boycott. That was way off from the truth. SithBorg came and edited all of his accusations of me being MDB aswell. I defended myself and wondered why I was being warned when I was trying to get all parties involved. But apparently, you Boys already have that taken care of. You expect us to stand by and wait on you. Forget it. Worry about Gencon all you want, I'll be there no matter what. I'll worry about this game before hand. You guys have had minis banned and then allowed them back with Erratas to abilities. I'm sick of it, and am not supporting you with any of this. This freak show is over.
celticindian
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:31:54 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 68
Location: San Diego
The analogy was "who's the best to train with". Would you rather take up training again with me, or Anderson Silva? No contest, you go with a proven best. The SWMgamers communtiy has the proven best, most knowledgable group around, hands down, no matter your personal feelings. They are trying their best to keep the game going where WotC left off, not reinvent it.
Is there aproblem in asking that the community wait until MotF comes out to see what it has to offer? Is there a problem with asking the community to wait until the summer cons are done? I honestly don't think so, but we may have differing opinions on that, but that's cool. Just be open minded about it, and realize that you may have a totally unexpected con experience in two years if you choose to ignore where the ENTIRE rest of the community goes. Be positive, contribute positive ideas. With your passion for the game, who knows??????
Blizzard Scout 1
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:43:41 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/24/2010
Posts: 140
celticindian wrote:
The analogy was "who's the best to train with". Would you rather take up training again with me, or Anderson Silva? No contest, you go with a proven best. The SWMgamers communtiy has the proven best, most knowledgable group around, hands down, no matter your personal feelings. They are trying their best to keep the game going where WotC left off, not reinvent it.
Is there aproblem in asking that the community wait until MotF comes out to see what it has to offer? Is there a problem with asking the community to wait until the summer cons are done? I honestly don't think so, but we may have differing opinions on that, but that's cool. Just be open minded about it, and realize that you may have a totally unexpected con experience in two years if you choose to ignore where the ENTIRE rest of the community goes. Be positive, contribute positive ideas. With your passion for the game, who knows??????

I can appreciate your sudden positivity, but what of the members wre are losing and are going to lose? We essentially start all over again, and face the same problems we had with Wizos. There is absolutely no way that most of us will be happy playing with someone elses idea of General Jar Jar. I would also like to point out that the person who modded that Jar Jar will probably play the crap out of him, because he made him. It isn't right on alot of levels. The designers of Minis weren't one with us, they were the guys who made what we payed for. Now, we will have people that we play with make Cards for the game, while they play the game. I'm sorry, but I can't sign on with this.
celticindian
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:52:10 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 68
Location: San Diego
I think that having players make the new cards can only improve the game. Will everyone be happy with them? No. But I think it wil be the best we can make of the situation.

Fair enough?
greentime
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:04:30 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/23/2009
Posts: 177
Good lord. How did this thread get so random?

Blizzard Scout 1, you are making arguments that have been made against various vcards in the CCG for ten years now. Sometimes that actually happened. Someone loved Massassi Base Operations so he made like six helper cards until it was great. You know what happened? He got kicked out of design, his cards got errata'ed, and the game moved on. At one point things got so confusing and frankly so broken that they had a "redux" where almost every vcard got rewritten. Hundreds of them. Watch Your Step (v) went from being the best deck in the history of the game to unplayable bad overnight. Scum went from being insanely good to respectable but beatable. People were upset, and some did quit. But even more people saw that the broken stuff was being fixed and came back on board.

It wasn't perfect, and it won't be perfect. But if enjoy playing the game, why not at least wait and see what comes out of the design groups. It might very well make you... enjoy it more!
Blizzard Scout 1
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:04:46 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/24/2010
Posts: 140
It has to be just as good for people who play at home as it is for us who play in DCI. What I mean is that it needs to be simple in order to peek the interests of new gamers. Remember, we are losing alot of members daily due to this news. we have to be able to gain some of that ground back.
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:06:53 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
Blizzard Scout 1 wrote:

I can appreciate your sudden positivity, but what of the members wre are losing and are going to lose? We essentially start all over again, and face the same problems we had with Wizos. There is absolutely no way that most of us will be happy playing with someone elses idea of General Jar Jar. I would also like to point out that the person who modded that Jar Jar will probably play the crap out of him, because he made him. It isn't right on alot of levels. The designers of Minis weren't one with us, they were the guys who made what we payed for. Now, we will have people that we play with make Cards for the game, while they play the game. I'm sorry, but I can't sign on with this.


Do you have a better idea? There will be ways to ensure that the wider community has input into the design of some pieces from the V-sets. I will break my back to ensure this. It's true that not everyone's input will be used. But there are ways to make sure it is heard. There will be people submitting stupid ideas (get over yourself and admit it), and those will be ignored, like they should. If you want to get involved in making the game positive, spend some time thinking up good ideas! People who know the game much better than you or I will be making many of the decisions. But, you and I will have the chance to be consulted at some. It's up to you to make the decision to have something worthwhile to contribute. The main designers at Gamers want to see the game prosper too; does it make sense for them to produce new cards that the community will hate? They will try to make figures that are fun for the community, while maintaining a competive environment.
celticindian
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:07:18 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 68
Location: San Diego
BS1 is right. We, as a community, need to keep current players, and intersst new players. Divisiveness doesn't help either.
greentime
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:13:27 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/23/2009
Posts: 177
celticindian wrote:
BS1 is right. We, as a community, need to keep current players, and intersst new players. Divisiveness doesn't help either.


Fundamentally, this is a local issue. If everyone in your local community knows that, every week, there are going to be people with maps and dice and figures at the store, ready to play, the game will live on. We play this game because it is fun, but also because it is a good reason to hang out with people we like. Keeping people in the game is not done by having Dean post passionate speeches on the Internet; it's done by talking with your friends and encouraging them to keep playing, by showing up at the LGS, and by pitching the game to people who are interested.
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:13:36 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
Blizzard Scout 1 wrote:
It has to be just as good for people who play at home as it is for us who play in DCI. What I mean is that it needs to be simple in order to peek the interests of new gamers. Remember, we are losing alot of members daily due to this news. we have to be able to gain some of that ground back.


The new stuff produced at Gamers will be better than anything you or anyone else by themselves (or in petulant groups of 5 or 6 who don't understand law or game balance) can do.

We're losing a lot of members?

ebay listings are steady (I've been keeping track)

Read the Wizards boards, and show me ONE post amid the hundred of those that say "I'm staying anyway" that says "i'm quitting"

If there is ground to be gained back, it's by an organized group of people that understands hundreds of times better than you or I alone what's good for the game. The Gamers committee will take this game forward better than anything you have offered. They might even do better than Wizards did (not as hard as you would think, normally volunteers taking over what a company used to do wouldn't meet with much success). Get on board Gamers or don't, just don't try to drag people onto your sinking ship.
Blizzard Scout 1
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:15:05 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/24/2010
Posts: 140
AdmiralMotti89 wrote:
Blizzard Scout 1 wrote:

I can appreciate your sudden positivity, but what of the members wre are losing and are going to lose? We essentially start all over again, and face the same problems we had with Wizos. There is absolutely no way that most of us will be happy playing with someone elses idea of General Jar Jar. I would also like to point out that the person who modded that Jar Jar will probably play the crap out of him, because he made him. It isn't right on alot of levels. The designers of Minis weren't one with us, they were the guys who made what we payed for. Now, we will have people that we play with make Cards for the game, while they play the game. I'm sorry, but I can't sign on with this.


Do you have a better idea? There will be ways to ensure that the wider community has input into the design of some pieces from the V-sets. I will break my back to ensure this. It's true that not everyone's input will be used. But there are ways to make sure it is heard. There will be people submitting stupid ideas (get over yourself and admit it), and those will be ignored, like they should. If you want to get involved in making the game positive, spend some time thinking up good ideas! People who know the game much better than you or I will be making many of the decisions. But, you and I will have the chance to be consulted at some. It's up to you to make the decision to have something worthwhile to contribute. The main designers at Gamers want to see the game prosper too; does it make sense for them to produce new cards that the community will hate? They will try to make figures that are fun for the community, while maintaining a competive environment.

I have a ton of ideas, and I know there are good guys doing this.
I never got into CCG, thats why I probably am all for V cards, because I know that at this point, its the only choice we have until the "Mother ship" comes and makes actual new minis. Thats why I'm not making huge arguements about CCG, because I don't have enough first hand experience with the game. But I have the experiaence in the world that I need when it comes to this game.
Like I said, I have ideas, and alot of them are for commons and uncommons, with very few Unique characters. And thats in fear of me creating a ridiculously powerful mini that people will hate and come after me for it. I don;t want that kind of heat.
But, I'm willing to hear this out.
Remove MDB from the Ban list on Gamers, and I can give you my word that you will get nothing but positive feedback from him and myself, I can't get on gamers, (We are Roommates)because i found out today that he was banned.
bokkendo
Posted: Saturday, January 30, 2010 8:33:00 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/11/2008
Posts: 71
LoboStele wrote:
dnemiller wrote:
I fully expect these boards to recieve less and less attention because while the game was alive they kind of let us know where we stand. So if you have not been to gamers get over there and help us.


Just to point out...when Dean says "these boards" he was talking about the WOTC boards. The post above is a copy/paste from what he put on WOTC.

Didn't want anybody to think he was saying Bloomilk would get less attention, as I'm pretty sure the opposite will happen. :P


Once their licence is up there probably wont be a forum on the WOTC site for any star wars gaminig stuff.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.