|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/9/2009
Posts: 574
Location: Keldabe, Mandalore
|
Since Wuher does not count as the nearest target for characters without Melee Attack, if he based a shooter, the shooter would not be able to attack him. Right?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
|
No, he can still be attacked as in that position.
No Blasters works exactly like Stealth, except it doesn't require cover and still works within 6 squared.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
EmporerDragon wrote:No, he can still be attacked as in that position.
No Blasters works exactly like Stealth, except it doesn't require cover and still works within 6 squared. Partially. No Blasters works like Stealth but without the 6 square requirement. Cover is still needed to not be targetted, even if it isn't explicitly stated. When Wuher has no cover, he is a perfectly valid target. The main interaction with No Blasters is that the next closest enemy becomes the closest. Remember, the rule is: A character in cover can only be targetted if they are the nearest enemy.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
Related question that I haven't seen mentioned anywhere, unless I just can't find it.
What significance (if any) does the wording "nearest target" have vs using "nearest enemy" in this case?
|
|
|
Guest |