|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/1/2012
Posts: 643
|
Does anyone else think that the Seps need a source of mobile or Greater Mobile Attack? Maybe a new Admiral Trench? I mean almost every other faction has access to it, but not the Seps. Tell me what you think.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
No. Because the other factions have it doesn't mean the Seps should. There are various other ways of movement breakers than Greater Mobile Attack.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
|
knappskirata wrote:Does anyone else think that the Seps need a source of mobile or Greater Mobile Attack? Maybe a new Admiral Trench? I mean almost every other faction has access to it, but not the Seps. Tell me what you think. I personally don't want GMA in the sep faction. They're very powerful as is, and the introduction of GMA to them would just make the IG86 squads that much more powerful (which i don't think is really necessary). The one exception I have to this is granting acces of GMA to living seps. I'd love to make some of the dookus more feasible on a competitive level. At this time, i don't think any dooku really has a shot at competitive play because he's a target for ranged attackers. GMA would help that a bit.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
|
No -there should be distinctions between factions. Lack of Mobile Attack is one of those distinctions for Seps.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
|
knappskirata wrote:Does anyone else think that the Seps need a source of mobile or Greater Mobile Attack? Maybe a new Admiral Trench? I mean almost every other faction has access to it, but not the Seps. Tell me what you think. Granting GMA is not Trench's Command style - he wasn't a "Hit and Run" strategist. A commander Riff Tamson would be acceptable granting regular Mobile Attack (NOT GMA) to droids provided limited to 6 squares, was somewhat weak defensively, and was slightly "overcosted". This would still make the character quite useful yet not an "auto-include" (which are very bad for the game).
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/8/2010
Posts: 3,623
|
No, there are better ways and one should maintain faction flavor. I love the Seps but yeah GMA isn't the right way to go, things like new Dolly's CE and the shield droid, that is what should be used. However one or two GMA type pieces (like Grievous HoH kind of) is a good option to throw in. What they really need is a force battery to make those seps good, new sideous hologram? As well as a Disciplined Leader Sev'rance that boosts both living and droid.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 1,233
|
i cannot see greater mobile attack for the seps. Now as to mobile attack, maybe for battle droids but that would be all. Greater mobile even if limited to droids would just get too powerful with access to so many attacks. A basic battle droid after all already has access to double, extra, and twin, not to mention all the bonuses to attack, defense and damage they can get. not to mention pieces like the heavy super battle droid having access to it, or even the b-3 super battle droids or the octupara droids. there are just far too many big amounts of possible attacks in the faction. Not to mention the idea of the lancer moving 12, attacking everything in its path with strafe, and then getting double and twin off on the landing
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
|
http://www.bloomilk.com/Custom/7751/commander-riff-tamsonHere's my take on the extent of Mobile/GMA in the seperatist faction.
|
|
|
Guest |