RegisterDonateLogin

How you get so big, drinking Milk of this kind?

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Let's talk strategy Options
PGaither84
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2013 10:18:41 AM
Rank: Bith Black Sun Vigo
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/1/2013
Posts: 20
TL:DR version: I'm a n00b. What are some basic tactics for infantry based squads [no beatsticks]? How does tempo work in this game? How can you create tempo? How can you best recover from tempo loss? What are some common mistakes to avoid?


I coach American Football and play Magic the Gathering competitively. What does that have to do with SWM? Well, in both of those communities, I can quickly and easily find resources to help new and experienced players. I also help other who are interested. Doing searches for SWM gaming has turned up very little. This was the best I could find. Very useful, but I could use a lot more.

It is also important to note that while I have casually played, mostly I just collected and used the minis in the RPG. My collection is made up of Rebel Storm through Universe with about a little bit of Bounty Hunter. I moved to Peru with my Peruvian wife two years ago and just recently my sister sent me my Star Wars collection [Minis, maps, RPG books, etc.] I am now introducing the game to some of the friends I have made since arriving. Sorry for the life story, but I thought some background would help. Also, it is important to note that I am not going to go out and just buy figures to make my army better. I have a sizable collection that I am happy with and might post pictures in the future.

What I would like to do is start a thread to ask question and talk about general game strategy. I want to get better, and my friends and I are the only ones who play, so we don't have "good players" to learn from. We know the rules, but really have no idea what we are doing. I am sure I would get destroyed against any veteran player, and if not, it would have more to do with owning good pieces than any strategy I have.

=======================================================================================

Let me give you two armies I built to fight against each other: 100 point build total, Droids vs. Clones

Droids:
5 Super Battledroids
8 Battledroids
2 Battledroid Officers.
100 points

Clones:
8 Clone troopers
2 Clone Commanders
98 points

Just two casual armies to have a shootout with on various maps.

One thing I noticed right away was that Super Battledroids and their Charging Fire is a real game changer. More so if you can get Synchronized Fire working. A potential total of +12 attack against the Clone's base 13 defense.

We have played a handful of games [even the Wife and I played some] and it normally just comes down to the roll of the dice. Once the pieces are in place for an exchange, it really comes down to who wins initiative, and if the dice are kind to them or not.

The basic strategy for the Droids [when I use them and when my friends do] is to active the dinky Battledroids first. Open doors and set up in firing position [even taking a pot shot if it's available] and basically getting them in position so the next round they can combine fire with the Supers.

What tends to work best for the clones [in our experience] is to aggressively attack the dinky Battle droids so they aren't there to combine fire with the Supers. The Clones can't really go after the Supers because they tend to sit back and wait to unleash their Charging Fire... so at least taking out the support helps. When the Clones tried to it back and take advantage of the Clone Commander's CE, it hasn't gone well. They just get picked apart... but again, I don't know if I am just not using them right.

NOTE: For fun, I am thinking of increasing the point total to 200 and adding a pair of Destroyer Droids and 4 more Supers for the separatists and a pair of AT-RT walkers and who knows what for the Republic, but that is just to increase the chaos.

=======================================================================================

The same question/ideas apply to the Rebels vs. Storm Troopers armies built. Piles of infantry with commanders - ATTACK!

Well, thanks for reading.
Echo24
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2013 11:47:40 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/30/2008
Posts: 1,288
Hmmm. Well, you're in an interesting position. Your collection doesn't reach very far, and you're also playing in a way that most people don't (you want to play with just infantry, no beatsticks). Of course that's a great way to play if you enjoy it, but it does limit your options significantly, and the game wasn't really designed to be played with just infantry like that.

The first thing I'll talk about is your squads. They really don't have much to them, and that can make the game a little more... shallow, I guess. I'm not surprised that you felt it just comes down to the dice rolls. Positioning would be important with them (like making sure you're always in cover and able to combine fire and such), but it seems like you have the basic strategies down right. You're killing the regular Battle Droids so they can't combine fire, which is good. I don't think you need much advice on the really simple stuff; you actually seem to have the strategy down for what you can do with those squads. They are just very limited squads.

You can make the squads much deeper but still stick to infantry. The ARC Trooper is a great piece if you're limited to just the first 4 sets; it would take 2 hits from Super Battle Droids to kill it, and can get to 20 Defense in cover. Then with its +10 Attack you will hit most things fairly well. It also has Grenades 10, so if you wind up getting close and your opponent has his Battle Droids bunched up you could potentially take out multiples in one turn. Maybe try dropping one of the Clone Trooper Commanders (their CEs don't stack anyway, you should only be playing one) and a Clone Trooper for an ARC Trooper.

The Wookiee Scout is also solid, because it has Stealth. That would make it much more difficult for your opponent to attack you, and even though the Wookiee has just 10 base damage that's enough to kill a regular Battle Droid. It also has momentum, so if you get close enough to move him adjacent he attacks at +9 for 20 damage, which would easily kill one of the Super Battle Droids. They're just 1 point more than a regular Clone Trooper, and gives your squad more options all around.

Finally, a Jedi Knight would be a strong addition I think (assuming it meets your "infantry" requirement). With 50 HP it would take a full 3 hits to kill him, and he also has 17 base Defense, so 21 in cover. Since he has Melee Attack, you need to be careful moving him up so he doesn't die, but if he can get into the middle of your opponent's squad without being hurt before he gets there he can be a great piece to kill one or two things but more importantly draw their fire while your troopers keep firing. The 2 Force Points help him get close since he can spend one to move 8 and attack (or 14 and not attack), or you could use them to reroll misses.

Now your squad looks like this:

ARC Trooper
Clone Trooper Commander
Jedi Knight
Wookiee Scout x2
Clone Trooper x4

This squad gives you a lot more options. You could just keep everyone but the Wookiees out of Line of Sight if your opponent has no accurate shot and they can take down a couple 10 HP Battle Droids, then when your squads get closer (he'll have to close on you eventually or your 2 Stealth characters will never die) the Clones can add their shots to help, the Wookiees can move adjacent and do great damage, and the ARC can look for kill shots on the Super Battle Droids with his higher attack. In the mean time your Jedi Knight should get into the fray by either sneaking around a side or if you manage to wind up having more activations and get to move him last in a round just move him 14 squares as the last activation, so next round he can be your first activation and hopefully run up to kill a Super Battle Droid.

There are other options too, of course. The Jedi Guardian is a good one since Lightsaber Sweep should result in killing multiple characters at once. The Senate Guard has Bodyguard, which is an excellent ability if there is a specific piece that you don't want to die (maybe he can team up with one of your Jedi so they can get in melee range more easily!). The Gungan Calvary on Kaadu is excellent for killing swarms of Battle Droids with Galloping Attack since he can make a lot of attacks in one turn. Same with the Clone Trooper on BARC Speeder.

My point, of course, is that playing more interesting squads makes for more interesting games. Imagine playing Magic where your entire deck was land and then a bunch of 1/1, 2/2, and 3/3 creatures with no abilities. It would probably feel like the game is all about luck (who can draw their 3/3s first?) and really just not very fun. Squads made up of all one or two characters with just a couple of special abilities between them is a similar thing in this game. It was never really meant to be played that way.
fingersandteeth
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2013 12:08:08 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 522
Location: Chicago
Playing with grunts as you are doing is an excellent way to learn the game IMO.

Far better than throwing a couple of undercosted hero's together and hoping that stats and abilities win you the game.

Your first observation of charging fire being a game changer is astute. In the SWM community, anything that allows a piece to move faster than their speed (or even just faster than 6 squares and attack) and attack is called a movement breaker. Any movement breaker is a huge addition to a squad purely because it opens up attacks that opponents may not be able to replicate and have to worry about or face the consequences. Movement breaking abilities define the most competitive sphere of the game and so learning the earlier, less powerful ones is a good start.
If you want to introduce a movement breaker to the clones you can do so by adding the Arial Clone trooper Captain who allows a follower within 6 squares to shoot at the end of the captains turn. This can allow you to move a piece 12 squares, then move the captain and allow the first piece to fire. It gives you the same 12 squares and attack that charging fire allows but its a 2 activation process and so has limitations. Still, if you can protect your commander and a follower then you won't lose the ability so long as he is around whereas charging fire will die with the last superbattle droid. Keeping this commander alive is a challenge but you can keep him behind a wall but within 6 of your follower who is the only piece exposed. Imperials have imperial officers for this also (imperial officer and heavy stormtrooper is a great heavy hitting combo. With rebels you have Bothan nobles (much later set than the ones you currently have bought from).

Another astute observation of yours is the importance of grunts. In SWM we call cheap pieces like battle droids "fodder". They don't seem to do a lot but are hugely important to a squad build for a variety of reasons.
A) they increase your activation count. Activations are HUGE in SWM. If you have more activations than your opponent then you will get a period of time at the end of each round where you move several pieces without your opponent moving anything until the next round. This process is so strong that competitive games had fodder pieces in them purely to spin and do little else just so a squad can attack without reprisal at the end of the round.
b) they open doors. Doors are such a large strategic part of the game and without playing with door control (Override, satchel charge, door gimmick) the need to be opened by figures. Because doors open at the end of a turn, you need to open it with figures that are expendable or are poor attackers. Often, opening a door will expose a piece, something you don't want to do to an important commander and thus fodder saves the day by being expendable. The expandability of fodder leads us to the next point
c) target blockers - until you get into special abilities like accurate shot that break the conventional targeting rules, fodder can take the hits that would otherwise go in your damage dealers. When playing with fragile figures that do good damage (Super battle droids and clones in your squads - so called "glass cannons") you need to offer up pieces that are more expendable. So by making use of cover and putting expendable pieces up front oppenets are forced to attack the expendable blockers saving your damage dealers for more offense later
d) Combined fire - kind of a lost art in this day and age but the SWM is a game of positioning and statistics. Anything that increases your chance to hit is a powerful tool. Combined fire using cheap pieces is a great tactic (a good one for the republic to use are Naboo troopers, 5 point shooters that combine with the more expensive clones). I know you already use this with battle droids but the cheaper your combined fire options the better.
Bear in mind that combined fire only works on teh characters turn so you cannot combine fire when a commander grants an attack to a follower.

Last bit about fodder - they arn't really expendable. In fact, usually they are my first targets. Taking away door openers, combined fire pieces or just general activations can have huge consequences for the options of opponents and really means that you should protect every piece until the trade is worth it.
Don't open a door unless you intend to attack, don't run a piece into the open without a reason. Stay out of LOS until the situation benefits you. Don't rely on cover, rely on not being seen. Move up out of LOS, and stay out of LOS even if it means a more guarded and cautious approach.

Your separatist builds have a good amount of fodder (Battle Droids) but your clone troop is lacking. Hence why i suggest naboo troopers as they are cheaper and you will be able to fit a few more on at the expense of 2 or 3 clones.

In the 2 squads that you suggested i would pick the droids to win. I would essentially wait out the clones by spinning or moving my battle droids out of LOS until your clones had gone and would then rush your clones end of round with charging fire trying to get no cover shots on your clones. Even with a lost initiative you might still have done enough at the end of the previous round to ensure you the win.

BTW - about initiative. When players of equal skill play, initiative does generally determine the winner. Or when skill is even, luck decides. Plenty of abilities alter the initiative gamble, for your collection i think its just recon, anticipation and master tactician which is only found on uniques in your collection.

I admire you propensity to play the game from an early set without heros, in fact i quite envy you. The core rules of the game make positioning more simplistic, more fun and more important compared to the ridiculous movement breaking that dominates often these days.
Still the fundamentals that you are learning now will serve you greatly as you delve into more complicated squads and abilities.

I hope this is helpful for you and enjoy the game. Its been a large factor in my life for almost a decade.

PGaither84
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2013 7:45:12 PM
Rank: Bith Black Sun Vigo
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/1/2013
Posts: 20
Firstly, thanks so much for the two great replies!

Secondly, I'm not against ever using unique characters and such. When I used to play at the local comic store in 2006 there were tons of silly casual armies. I saw the "classic" Mace Windu getting carried around by R2D2 and stuff like that. TO me, that can be silly fun, but not how I want to play.

I like that Star Wars minis is a game system that let you have fun and play an army with both Jango & Boba Fett. I like that you can play a game where Darth Maul is in the Clone Wars, or what ever craziness you want. However, I also like to play thematically, and that means while I can have Pilot Luke Skywalker leading an army of Jaws against Madalorians... and even though that sounds funny/cool after typing it out... I would really rater play a war game. Sure, in the past I got a lot of use out of my Darth Vader Jedi Hunter because he is crazy powerful... and with 150 point games I would toss in Aura Sing and really go to town... but still, the Storm Troopers versus Rebels or Clone wars battles were always the most memorable. I wish I had taken snap shots a few years ago when we played a massive 1,000 point battle of Republic vs Separatists. Two Muunilist maps with one turned over for the blank side and tiles placed on it and some heroes. There were things like AT-RT walkers, the flash speeder, BARC Speeder, Arial Clone Captains, and so forth against Destroyer Droids, the smaller Spider droids, crab droids, the Hailfire Droid, Corporate Alliance tank droid, and tons of fodder. It was epic, took forever to get through the fist few rounds, and as the carnage wore on the game came to quick resolution, and though I forget who won, it doesn't really matter. It was awesome.

I am probably going to suggest 200 point games and start to include Destroyer droids, AT-RT walkers and a few more units to make the battle bigger and more epic. Maybe one Clone Commander, but not 2. I might replce the other one with a "Jedi Knight" which is also 13 points... maybe. The Wookie Scout idea is nice, but honestly, wasn't that just for the battle of Kashyyyk? What's a good map for Kashyyyk? The Endor moon map? I might replace some basic clones with Kashyyyk troopers [same cost, but twin attack]

I might even bump it up to 250 or 300 later to find room for Republic commandos. Right now I use the commandos more for scenario games as more of a DM rather than a traditional game. They have an objective, the enemy character are hidden until they are encountered, etc. An RPG feel without character creation.
EmporerDragon
Posted: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:12:17 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
fingersandteeth wrote:

BTW - about initiative. When players of equal skill play, initiative does generally determine the winner. Or when skill is even, luck decides.


One thing I can suggest to mitigate some of that is to always play as if you're going to lose initiative, even if you've got Master Tactician. Being conservative like that will help keep your squad alive.

Also regarding imitative, are you aware of the popular change made to it for sanctioned play? Basically, whoever goes first in the round only activates one character on their first phase of the round instead of two. It really prevents situations where the game hinges on a single initiative where both characters have their main beats trained on each other and whoever wins the dice roll, wins the game.
PGaither84
Posted: Sunday, January 13, 2013 10:14:53 PM
Rank: Bith Black Sun Vigo
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/1/2013
Posts: 20
Instead of opening another thread, I would also like to talk about the diagonal rules in SWM.

I do not play tournaments, so House Rules are a great way to improve game play in areas we find lacking. One thing that we are using is the 1-2-1-2 diagonal count from D&D.

The default rules, unles I misunderstand them, means that the following picture is how you determine a CE:







In our opinion, the 1-2-1-2 diagonal count is much better and logical.

Sithborg
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:02:00 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
While that may work for what you play with, it is a very bad idea to implement with the later pieces.
There are a lot of abstractions in this game. Given the grid nature of the game, I don't understand why the square nature of range is more "accurate" than your near circular range. And I find it would mess with how quite a few maps were set up. Having diagonals only cost 2 when moving onto Rough Terrain and Low Objects is really, really big.
FlyingArrow
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:20:43 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
Also, CEs are counted as distance from a square, so you have to count around walls and closed doors. Your picture would be correct if there were no walls or doors.
PGaither84
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 10:04:06 AM
Rank: Bith Black Sun Vigo
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/1/2013
Posts: 20
FlyingArrow wrote:
Also, CEs are counted as distance from a square, so you have to count around walls and closed doors. Your picture would be correct if there were no walls or doors.


Yeah, I was just trying to show the difference of a more accurate/logical measurement.

Sithborg wrote:
Given the grid nature of the game, I don't understand why the square nature of range is more "accurate" than your near circular range.
A square is a representation of a 5 foot area. a 1-2-1-2 count for diagonal squares is more accurate. WotC knows that. That's how their other games are set up. SWM is just a simplification of the RPG, which is a re-skin of D&D. To keep things light and simple, they implemented a "diagonal movement = 2 squares" rule. 1-2-1-2 is the right way to do things... though more difficult to enforce and keep track of. Especially at a DCI event.

Quote:
And I find it would mess with how quite a few maps were set up. Having diagonals only cost 2 when moving onto Rough Terrain and Low Objects is really, really big.


If you are used to one system, than changes to it might sound monumental, but it really isn't. The square grids are really there to make life simpler. Much easier and faster than Warhammer [40k] and Mechwarrior/Battletech games that require you to use a measuring tape and such. Plus, with squares, it's much easier to mark where a piece is if you have to move it, or it gets moved accidentally.

You don't have to use the custom rule, but I suggest you give it a shot. People I had never met before back home in the states thought that was the rule, after having come from other D20 systems, and when posted about this in the rules section here at Bloo Milk someone else also said that is how they used to play for a long time not knowing it wasn't the rules.



Door closed




Door Open




SWM standard rules door closed




SWM standard rules door open
Sithborg
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 10:34:11 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
Again, fine with how you play. It doesn't sound like you play with the pieces that would break it down. I'm not a fan of house rules in the first place, but I can assure you, this one would break a lot of stuff in the "current" game. Without your self restrictions, this breaks down a lot of how pieces, powers, and I'm sure a few maps were designed.

It's fine if you like the rule. But with the amount of abstractions already in this game, "logical" and "accurate" means extremely little to what else is there. And another big difference: simple vs more complex. I already have a big enough fight trying to keep things more simple.
EmporerDragon
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:33:19 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
Sithborg wrote:
I'm not a fan of house rules in the first place, but I can assure you, this one would break a lot of stuff in the "current" game.


Most house rules do. They may seem innocuous at first, but tend to cause a butterfly effect or cascade reaction that makes the game completely different that how it was meant to be.

I think the only house rule I've ever been comfortable with was no Oddjob in Goldeneye.
urbanjedi
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:42:26 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/30/2008
Posts: 2,093
On a side note, house rules can be a blast, but at the end of the day, I like to play any game the way the rules stipulate so that if I go and play in a tournament or at some location outside my playgroup that I am not at a disadvantage. For instance has anyone ever played scrabble with 9 tiles (instead of the normal 7)? It's fun to do once in a while, but changes the way the game is played. So we only played that a few times before we reverted back to the normal rules of the game.

House rules are fine (I use them all the time in scenarios) but I would just prefer to play with the rules as written for most games and game system unless something just really isn't working with the rules as written.
fingersandteeth
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:14:18 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 522
Location: Chicago
either way counting diagonals 1-2-1 or 2 -2 -2 your still just counting squares and knowledge of the limits of your movement is basic addition.

The above modification might make commander effects easier to use but the game has has almost a decade of convention which, if you start to learn it in a different way, then you will only encounter issues when you play with others who play conventionally.

D&D had the 1-2-1 convention when SWM was released. As far as i remember, the designers of WotC knew about that but decided to use the 2-2-2 convention in order to separate the two games. They also focused on a ranged based attacking style to further differentiate. Perhaps the two statements above are linked? Who knows now but there is not a huge amount of difference between the 2 and it will come down to personal preference as to who prefers what.

you can play in whatever fashion you want to in a house but when it comes to the SWM community the convention is established. I have less of a problem with the treatment of diagonals than the treatment of lightsaber attacks sometimes not being melee and i feel no compulsion to re-set either.

With lancers, yobuck and some of the incredibly fast pieces they grow so much stronger with a 1-2-1 diagonal range.

The game is balanced to a 2-2-2 diagonal. The conversation on the treatment of diagonals thus ends with "it is that way because that is how it was/is designed."

PGaither84
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 9:46:31 PM
Rank: Bith Black Sun Vigo
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/1/2013
Posts: 20
Okay, so tonight after looking at my collection, I was thinking about 4 Clone troopers, 1 ARC Trooper and 2 Arial Clone Troopers. That's 100 points, has some movement breakers to fight against the Super Battle Droids, and a little more health [3 guys with 40 HP]. I haven't played with it yet, but it looks like it could be fun. I am losing activations though.

I only own 2 Naboo troopers, and honestly don't really want to use them. They look out of place and don't fit the flavor of what I want to do.

I am still thinking about increasing the build totals to 150 or 200 to make the battles a bit more epic. I don't own a ton of figures. I have a decent collection, but it is limited. Again, this thread is more about general tactics of game play and little about army building.


Should I only use 1 Arial Clone trooper? How should I fill out the other 23 points if I only use 1? Maybe a Jedi Knight and a Clone Trooper Sergent? The Sergent grants keen critical [Crtis on 19 or 20] but droids are immune to critical hits, and a 19 is already good enough to hit. I'm not against using a Jedi... and I'm not against using a unique Jedi... because that is part of the story, but I kind of want to wait to add Jedi/unique figures to larger battles... say 300+ points. Not a skirmish.
EmporerDragon
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:29:31 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
I'd suggest against the Aerial Clone Trooper Captains. For their price, they really aren't worth it unless you can give the CE to someone who can deal decent damage, like an AT-RT or an ISP Speeder.

The Sergeant tends to be worthless, unless you're building a squad revolving around crits, which usually never works and also requires using a Chagrin Mercenary Commander.

For the points, you're better off with another ARC Trooper (Or better yet, an ARC Trooper Sniper) + filler instead of a Captain.

If you're thinking of adding a unique to the mix, why not one of the versions of the Clone Commanders (Cody, Gree, Bacara, Rex)? In addition to being excellent fighters, all 7 versions have excellent CEs that give a massive boost to troopers.

Otherwise, something like:

Clone Trooper Commander
ARC Trooper x2
Elite Clone Trooper x2
ARF Trooper
Clone Trooper x2

would make for a decent enough squad if they're only going up against basic droids.
PGaither84
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:23:49 AM
Rank: Bith Black Sun Vigo
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/1/2013
Posts: 20
That sounds good... except I never opened the unique clone commanders like Cody and such. The ARC trooper is listed as an uncommon, yet in all the boxes of Clone strike I ripped, I only ever got one 1. I opened a number of duplicate uncommons except that one. I even had a number of duplicate of rares. That ARC trooper felt [feels] more like an ultra rare rather than an uncommon. Now that I have caught the bug to play again [since 2008 or so] I might save up some money on the side to order individual figures to help flush out my collection.

In larger armies I would always pair up the AT-RT with the Arial Clone Trooper.
corranhorn
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 8:32:33 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/14/2009
Posts: 1,728
Yeah, the ARc Trooper is notorious for that. Lucky for me, I pulled mine in the first starter set I ever got! ThumbsUp
fingersandteeth
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 8:55:37 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/2/2008
Posts: 522
Location: Chicago
EmporerDragon wrote:
I'd suggest against the Aerial Clone Trooper Captains. For their price, they really aren't worth it unless you can give the CE to someone who can deal decent damage, like an AT-RT or an ISP Speeder.



I guess its all opinion but back in the Clone strike era the captain was a great piece. Look at the droid squads, he's not really fighting high hit point pieces and the captain will increase the number and range of your attacks. The captain has a good attack himself can make your best trooper fire twice (the arc for example) and the potential 12 square strike should not be underestimated.

His main failing is the low HP for cost and that he is large but when your fighting droids and other weak pieces he is a very useful piece. He also has 4 x the HP of regular clones.

I used to run him and clones with Kit Fisto. Lot of fun in the day.
Echo24
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:07:13 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/30/2008
Posts: 1,288
Yeah, the ACTC is a good choice. Like fingersandteeth pointed out, you don't really have to worry about giving the shots to high damage pieces like the AT-RT if you aren't shooting high HP pieces. Since you're mostly talking about killing Battle Droids or Super Battle Droids, just 20 damage is enough. In addition to the movement breaking of getting to move 12 squares with a character and then have the shoot on the ACTC's turn, you also have the option of just moving 6 or less with that first character and getting 2 shots in a phase with the ACTC, in addition to the ACTC's own shot. So most phases you're killing 2 droids max, but in the ACTC's round you get to kill 3. That's good stuff.
EmporerDragon
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:42:12 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
Points conceded. I guess my perspective is from coming into the game during RotS, where he always seemed too fragile to be effective.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.