|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/5/2009
Posts: 2,240
Location: Akron Ohio, just south of dantooine.
|
Does a character with Twin Attack get the twin on a deathshot?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
|
Yes, but other bonuses, like Mon Mothma's +10 damage, would only apply to the first attack.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/5/2009
Posts: 2,240
Location: Akron Ohio, just south of dantooine.
|
That was what I thought, untill reading the Resolving Effects List.
13. Resolve any remaining "when defeated" effects such as Impulsive Shot, Impulsive Sweep, Self-Destruct, Cleave, Rolling Cleave, Mon Mothma's commander effect, and so on. Use the simultaneous effects rule as usual. As in previous steps, Impulsive Shot and Impulsive Sweep can begin new attack sequences that interrupt this sequence; resolve the new attack completely, then continue where you left off with the original attack.
14. Remove the defeated character from the battle grid.
15. Resolve any non-damaging effects that have not yet triggered like movement from Force Push, or activation saves from Shockwave.
16. Resolve Twin Attack by returning to step 5 and repeating the remainder of the process (except this step.)
Shouldn't step 16 be before step 14 for the Twin to be effective? Or is this another SWM's rules that makes you go "HUH??"
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
|
I know EmporerDragon is correct. i don't know why that list states that twin resolves after the character is defeated thoug.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
Because it is not referring to the attacker.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
|
Sithborg wrote:Because it is not referring to the attacker. Derp
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/5/2009
Posts: 2,240
Location: Akron Ohio, just south of dantooine.
|
adamb0nd wrote:Sithborg wrote:Because it is not referring to the attacker. Derp Double derp.
|
|
|
Guest |