RegisterDonateLogin

Is the war paint on Felucian Rancors.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Bringing Back GOWK Options
xpraider
Posted: Saturday, July 4, 2009 3:42:18 PM
Rank: Droid Starfighter in Walking Mode
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/7/2008
Posts: 48
Well, since the debate seems to be over, and GOWK is now out of DCI legal play. What would it take to bring him back? As far as I can tell there are 3 overall options: Change the rules of play so he isn't as powerful, Change GOWK himself to make him more inline, create a new figure(s) that balance him out, or some combination of the three.

Not all of these are practical or even likely. Probably the most likely answer is that a new figure with a new ability comes out which brings him in balance, and this is all speculation. If you want to post an idea, try to post 3 things about an idea: What it is, how it would work against GOWK, and what it would do to the rest of the game. Another important thing to note is the viability of the option.

One thing to really consider is how much of a change is really needed to return him to DCI play. There is a question of whether a true nerf needs to be done, or if something that can take the edge off his effectiveness would do.

I think most of the possible options of changing GOWK himself have probably already been discussed; drop MOTF 2 and Mettle, change Soresu to a 16 save, or drop soresu to LS defense. Each of these will reduce his overall effectiveness to a different degree, and make his defenses easier to get through.

As far as rules changes go, Mettle no longer stacking has been discussed, but it won't change the percentage of his making the save very much. They could make a change that you can't use the force to make more than 1 reroll. There aren't that many characters out there that this would really affect, since any character that could would have to have at least MOTF 2. I think Loda with evade would be the most effected by it. GOWK would still have a very high chance of making his save though, but perhaps add that with removing mettle might make a difference.

In terms of figures, I'm still working that out a bit. But something that can reduce his defense, along with something that has a lot of attacks which could overwhelm his soresu, or a new fringe disruptive. A new crack gunner or a cheap direct damage could also work.

Dr. Destructo
Posted: Saturday, July 4, 2009 5:03:32 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/26/2009
Posts: 272
you had to say it didn't you, bring him back, after all this, after all the flaming...can't we be free of GOWK discussions just for alittle.....good, bad, hypothetical, whatever. my brain hurts.
TK-4334
Posted: Sunday, July 5, 2009 3:16:51 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/5/2009
Posts: 239
Location: Germany
I never have visit a forum, where the people deal with only one subject ... GOWK!
Flapper
Partof1
Posted: Sunday, July 5, 2009 2:50:50 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/10/2008
Posts: 184
Location: Middle of an Albertan field
When he is banned, I can imagine no figure that can be made to unbreak him. Anything that hurts him will hurt the many other pieces with Mettle, or MotF, or even Melee. Once he's gone, he's gone.
DarthJak
Posted: Monday, July 6, 2009 2:48:23 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/30/2008
Posts: 1,290
Location: Stow Ohio, just north of Dantooine (vacay on Ando)
GOWK IS A 4 LETTER WORD WE SHOULD NOT SPEAKScared
defender390
Posted: Monday, July 6, 2009 4:34:39 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/7/2008
Posts: 396
New figures, definitely. Maybe an improved Disruptive ability. Maybe a more efficient Dooku with Makashi Style Mastery. More characters with Force Defense, possibly. We even already have cheap direct damage pieces. The possiblities are endless and I bet we will see him in the near future as the game grows.
Doogle126
Posted: Monday, July 6, 2009 4:41:58 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/21/2009
Posts: 406
+1 BlooMilk to Defender390 for not using the G word in his last post
swmimperial130
Posted: Monday, July 6, 2009 4:46:01 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2009
Posts: 908
Location: Felucia, near the Ancient Abyss
Doogle126 wrote:
+1 BlooMilk to Defender390 for not using the G word in his last post

you mean He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named?
Doogle126
Posted: Monday, July 6, 2009 4:47:06 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/21/2009
Posts: 406
Him-That-We-Do-Not-Speak-Of is a more appropriate term
swmimperial130
Posted: Monday, July 6, 2009 4:51:13 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2009
Posts: 908
Location: Felucia, near the Ancient Abyss
ThumbsUp
Doogle126 wrote:
Him-That-We-Do-Not-Speak-Of is a more appropriate term
xpraider
Posted: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 8:18:21 AM
Rank: Droid Starfighter in Walking Mode
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/7/2008
Posts: 48
Ok. So possible figures or at least abilities that would allow He-Who-Has-Now-Been-Banned back.

Dark Side Spirits [Exar Kun, Freedon Nadd, Marka Ragnos]: Cost 10 Stats: HP-, Def -, Atk -, Dam -. Special Abilities: Dark Side Spirit; Ignores characters and terrain. Cannot open doors. Cannot attack or be damaged, and does not count as a legal target, the nearest enemy, or adjacent. Not subject to commander effects. Does not provide cover. At the start of the skirmish, choose one unique enemy character. The chosen enemy gains Dark Force Renewal 1 (every time this character activates it loses 1 force point) and Internal Strife while this character remains within 4 squares. A character within 6 squares can spend X number of Force points to defeat this character, where x is the characters current number of Force Points. This effect replaces that character's attacks).

swsf17
Posted: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 8:26:24 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/13/2009
Posts: 143
Location: Southern Illinois
where is it posted that GOWK is banned. the only place i see it is on bloomilk. could someone tell me where they got their information?Confused
Emissary
Posted: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 8:36:18 AM
Rank: Hailfire Droid
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/29/2009
Posts: 37
Location: Kannapolis, NC
Boba52
Posted: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 9:19:51 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/29/2008
Posts: 194
Location: Minnesota
Cheer up guys it's not a funeral. The bearded one can be played with for 10 more days. Make them count!Flapper
xpraider
Posted: Thursday, July 9, 2009 7:53:50 AM
Rank: Droid Starfighter in Walking Mode
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/7/2008
Posts: 48
Ok, another couple of ideas.

Black Sun Thug: 12 Points
HP: 30
Def: 14
Atk: 6
Dam 10
Special Abilities: Crack Shot [This character's Attacks can not be negated or redirected.]

Mon Calamari Black Sun Vigo: 23 Points
HP: 50
Def: 17
Atk: 8
Dam 20
Special Abilities: Distraction [Special Abilities used in response to this character's attacks with a Save of 11 are now Save 16.]. Twin Attack, Mobile Attack

Commander Effect: Followers within 6 squares with Stealth gain Distraction [Special Abilities used in response to this character's attacks with a Save 11 are now Save 16.]
mercenary_moose
Posted: Thursday, July 9, 2009 7:59:17 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/11/2008
Posts: 1,122
Basically, what I'm hearing is that we need a way to get around SSM. More and better Direct Damage pieces would do the job nicely, I think.

BTW, I saw this suggestion for an SA to counter He Who Will Remain Unnamed on the WOTC boards and I like it:

Superior Disintegration: If this character targets an enemy with Soresu Style Mastery, that piece is automatically Disintegrated

Best SA ever! Woot
billiv15
Posted: Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:04:07 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/4/2008
Posts: 1,441
mercenary_moose wrote:
Basically, what I'm hearing is that we need a way to get around SSM. More and better Direct Damage pieces would do the job nicely, I think.


Coming from some people. Certainly not from me. More or better direct damage isn't the answer and will not allow for GOWK to come off the banned list.

Some kind of errata from the Design team at WotC would be required for him to come off the list. Anything less than that is a pipe dream from my perspective.

And considering that they had the floor rules a month and a half before posting them, and watched the regional results carefully before approving the ban, I would say the odds of an errata are also pretty much 0.

I think you all need to face it, odds are GOWK will never be legal.
Volvagia14
Posted: Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:18:11 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/3/2008
Posts: 498
Location: somewhere over the rainbow (a rainbow in Indiana)
maybe we will see a new G**K in Galaxy at War ....
xpraider
Posted: Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:22:19 AM
Rank: Droid Starfighter in Walking Mode
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/7/2008
Posts: 48
billiv15 wrote:

I think you all need to face it, odds are GOWK will never be legal.


If that's true it's one of the biggest tragedies of the game then, and another issue I have with the ban. I personally believe that a ban should at most be a stop gap measure until a true fix can be implemented. If the ban IS the fix, then it only adds to my hesitation regarding the ban in the first place. Because not only will he not truly be fixed or dealt with, it also sets a precedence to ban other pieces. But at the moment any fix is really up to Rob to deal with.

He's a great piece and with some balance has a lot to give the Republic as a faction, I'd hate to see the potential he has wasted in tournament play.

Mordantos
Posted: Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:51:37 AM
Rank: Dark Trooper Phase III
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/1/2008
Posts: 24
xpraider wrote:
... He-Who-Has-Now-Been-Banned...
Ooh, I like that nicknameThumpUp

Really, I don't see how a new figure can fix He-Who-Has-Now-Been-Banned without breaking other things. And why spend a spot on a figure to fix He-Who-Has-Now-Been-Banned when that spot can go to a new Kenobi who doesn't have the same problems of He-Who-Has-Now-Been-Banned.

I am hopeful that the precendent set by the Elite AT-AT Driver indicates that something similar might happen to He-Who-Has-Now-Been-Banned that would allow the figure to be playable in DCI.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.