Awesome!
I've commented on a couple of the flyer and droid-ier ones, mainly about costing potentials.
I'm liking the angles on a lot of the different flyers. there's a lot of ideas here
thanks for sharing.

My favorite at this time though, is the T-16 skyhopper.

@blemelisk,
sure thing
were there any specific ones you were seeking concrit and workshopping on?

as a general overall feedback in addition to directed feedback on the standouts,
indeed, you're already in the ballpark of the final cost,
to me, you ostensibly undercost by 3-8pts, based on meta,
though some pieces are over-costed as their avg survivability means they won't make the impact.
it's a little like the game show "The Price Is Right" hehe
its an inexact art, though I think you've got the knack of it.

Surf had a neat spreadsheet idea, and that stat-card generator over at gamers had an interesting cost routine.
I think the base was
4pts
non unique 0 SAs
10hp
10def
+4ATK
10dmg.

it's +1pt per 10Hp/1DEF/1ATK until a limit.
its +2~5pts to 20DMG,
and +10pts to 30DMG, then +20~25pts for 40DMG... exponential thereafter.

It's then, count the number of positive and negative SAs, FPs or CEs,
and for each SA over 4 theres a +1-3pt penalty,
negative SAs, and some CEs subtract -1~-5pts.
negative SAs are how to keep a piece around the pricepoint you want.

---

using the above costing approach,
that's what is leading to the feeling some are undercosted. that, and potential meta combos hehe.
bear in mind though, that algorithm will tend to overcost rather than undercost.
a lot hinges on those metacombos, and the subjective appraisal of what constitutes a positive or negative SA, FP, CE etc.

so,
I think you've achieved what you set out to achieve, blemelisk
namely, to encapsulate these vehicles, without making them 'cookie cutter'.
each offers a genuinely different suite of SAs at a different price point,
which don't overcompete, either with each other, or existing VSET or WotC pieces,
which is a crucial consideration in minis.

As to making vehicles competitive and viable outright,
I think we need staggered activation, and an overhaul of how vehicles and terrain interact,
so as vehicles can demolish terrain etc
that is entirely my own subjective reflection on the direction
vehicles ostensibly oughta head towards hehe.

vehicles that have staggered activation boosts the activations,
and adds a wildcard factor; what might the vehicle do with those acts, in which order?
so, that slight unpredictability is what vehicles have going for them,
in addition to asymmetry or mobility.

contrast that with the Official ATAT, which is predictable thanks to the ponderous relentless hehe.

I just looked at the first one (http://www.bloomilk.com/Custom/27842/tie-ap-1-mauler) - these are my thoughts:

If you compare it with a Storm Commando - a 17 point non-unique WOTC Imperial piece with double attack, and comparable stats, I think the Storm Commando is stronger overall - it doesn't have a huge base (a significant disadvantage) and it has more useful Special Abilities.

http://www.bloomilk.com/Character/1496/stormtrooper-sniper from the v-sets is another comparison.

Unless there are specific commander effects for it, it's just not playable. It feels like Huges were treated fairly badly by WOTC, and none of them were useful, and it's not a good place to start from. I think you could cost in the early 20s and be fine.

Based on that one, I think the power level is just too low - I think you're using WOTC huges as the baseline, so you're kind of dooming them to being irrelevant. I'd shave 10-15 points off it, and throw on some more candy, and it might get interesting.

you must be heading in the right direction
a lot of folks are leaving awesome feedback

Staggered Activation is tricky, it can be between 1 to say 10 or so.
While at first not appearing to have utility, Staggered Activation 1 prevents pawn of the darkside and some other situational VSET 'betrayal/hacking" etc...
it could have speed 0, and no actual movement SA's, or damage... say, a republic command post or shield generator emplacement.

they could also all be movement only on a non-attacking transport, 5 activations, speed 8, accelerate 24... now, that is a nasty amount of movement for a starfighter...
or 2/3rds movement, 1 for attack, 2 attack, 1 movement, all kinds of combos out to 10 activations on one vehicle.
you can play with it, as there's only 1 official miniature with Staggered Activation -
staggered activation is this hook that WotC put there, and never completely developed.

having one vehicle add an extra 10 acts, is a defacto San Hill tempo control almost,
that is, if the vehicle survives. having it also have recon and reserves etc,
that'd be real nasty.

If you have shields X and DR10 or DR20,
that will survive long enough to force more Ion weapons and 'hobsons choice auto-includes' like direct damage, into the meta haha.

This would make vehicles a go-to counter for vong spamster squads, especially if a tank had
"crush-n-grind; while moving, if this character would move through a square occupied by an enemy, that enemy without Flight is defeated, save 11. if they succeed on the save, the character moves away from the vehicle until it is no longer touching where that vehicle would move, save 11. this movement causes AoO's...

now, see, that'd put a dent into a lot of squad spamming and those stupid survivable vong.
muahaha!