|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,291
|
Lets keep the discussio about things ere, and use the other thread for actual Play Reports to make it easier to find. Lets do this!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,291
|
9 games of the 9 reported for round 1
1. Spry -1-0 3 points (246 gambit)
2. Thereisnotry 1-0 3 points (230 gambit)
3. Shmi15 1-0 3 ppints (208 gambit)
4. PNKTD 1-0 3 points (205 Gambit)
5.UrbanSHmi 1-0 3 points (203 gambit)
6.Darth Frenchy 1-0 3 points (200 gambit)
7.UrbanJedi1-0 3 points (202 Gambit)
8.Kezza_Machine 3 points 200 Gambit
9.Deaths_Baine 1-0 3 points (200 gambit)
10. Ultrastar - 1-0 2 Points (46 Gambit)
11.. Dart_jim 0-1 1 point ( 166 gambit)
12.DarthO 0-1 1 Point ( 136 gambit)
13. Caedus 0-1 1 point ( 125 gambit)
14. Naarkon 0-1 1 point ( 122 gambit)
15. TimmerB 0-1 1 point (110 gambit)
16. Jan'ari 0-1 1 point (108 gambit)
17. McNizle - 0-1 0 points (31 gambit)
18. FlyingArrow 0 Points 0 Gambit
19. Darth Rattlehead 0 Points 0 Gambit
Round 2 Rankings!!!!!
9 of 9 games reported
1.Thereisnotry 2-0 6 points 465 Gambit
2.Spry 2-0 6 points 450 Gambit points
3.Death's Baine 2-0 6 points 428 gambit
4.KezzaMachine 2-0 5 points 381 gambit points
5.Ultrastar 2-0 5 Points 246 Gambit
6.Darth_Jim 1-1 4 points 366 Gambit
7.Darth Frenchy 1-1 4 points 345 gambit points
8.Urbanjedi 1-1 4 points 345 gambit
9.PNKTD 1-1 4 points 341 gambit points
10.Darth O 1-1 4 points 336 Gambit
11.Caedus 1-1 3 points 274 gambit
12.McNizzle 1-1 3 points 231 Gambit
13.Shmi15 1-1 3 points 206 Gambit
14.UrbanShmi 1-1 3 points 203 Gambit
15.FlyingArrow 1-1 3 points 202 gambit
16.TimmerB 0-2 2 points 210 Gambit
17.Naarkon 0-2 1 point 204 gambit
18.Jenari 0-2 1 Point 123 Gambit
19.DarthRattlehead 0-2 0 Points 0 Gambit
ROUND 3 RANKINGS!!!!
8/8 games reported
1.Spryguy 3-0 9 points 654 Gambit Points
2.Ultrastar 3-0 8 points 446 Gambit Points
3.Thereisnottry 2-1 7 points 583 gambit Points
4.DarthO 2-1 7 points 536 Gambit Points
5.DarthFrenchy 2-1 7 points 545 Gambit Points
6.Flying Arrow 2-1 6 points 402 Gambit Points
7.Caedus 2-1 5 points 439 Gambit Points
8.KezzaMachine 2-1 5 points 381 Gambit Points
9.Shmi15 2-1 5 points 350 Gambit Points
10.UrbanJedi 2-1 4 points 395 Gambit
11.Naarkon 1-2 4 points 404 Gambit Points
12.UrbanSHmi 1-2 4 points 348 Gambit Points
13.McNizzle 1-2 3 points 300 Gambit Points
14.TimmerB 0-3 3 points 310 Gambit
15.Darth Rattlehead 0-3 points 0 0 Gambit Points
ROUND 4 RANKINGS
7/7 Games Reported
Ultrastar 4-0 11 points
Thereisnotry 3-1 10 points
Spryguy 3-1 9 Points
FlyingArrow 3-1 9 points
Caedus 3-1 8 points
UrbanJedi 3 -1 7 points
Darth Frenchy 2-2 7 points
UrbanShmi 2-2 7 points
DarthO 2-2 7 points
Shmi15 2-2 6 points
Timmer B 1-3 6 points
Kezza 2-2 5 points
Naarkon 1-3 4 points
McNizzle 1-3 3 Points
DarthRattlehead 1-3 3 points
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,291
|
Bump
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/29/2017
Posts: 278
|
jen'ari wrote:Fun Fun Fun!
i got out played.
but if i won that initiative I had a small chance. One of the more tactical games I have ever had to play. The set up for round 3 and the round 3 craziness was amazing and I had butterflies in my stomach like I used to when playing soccer against a better opponent, so that experience was amazing to have again, haha.
I really like Malgus, Caedus, Barris, Holocron, and Exar. I think I will play it and play it until I am really good with it.
it was awesome! and the Sith Holocron is a piece of art, it is tricky to play so it makes it well worth it, but man it can potentially do alot. That for sure is one of Sith's best options, a nasty squad that can handle a lot! :)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/30/2008
Posts: 2,093
|
one of those urban shmis should be an urban jedi
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
|
Btw, not that it matters here - but that is not how ranking works. Gambit score plays no part it it whatsoever.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,291
|
TimmerB123 wrote:Btw, not that it matters here - but that is not how ranking works. Gambit score plays no part it it whatsoever. It should matter... It seems to make the most sense. If not, oh well, consider this my official " Power Rankings"
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
|
shmi15 wrote:TimmerB123 wrote:Btw, not that it matters here - but that is not how ranking works. Gambit score plays no part it it whatsoever. It should matter... It seems to make the most sense. If not, oh well, consider this my official " Power Rankings" I dont know how much it should matter or not, but it should be established form the start. I would not have conceded the win when I had zero chance and would have lived another round (therefore TINT would have gotten another round of gambit) and he could have collected more gambit in one of the rounds if it was a large factor in things. because conceding before the end should not really happen if the actual points (beyond the 3 for winning) play a part in rankings
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,291
|
jen'ari wrote:shmi15 wrote:TimmerB123 wrote:Btw, not that it matters here - but that is not how ranking works. Gambit score plays no part it it whatsoever. It should matter... It seems to make the most sense. If not, oh well, consider this my official " Power Rankings" I dont know how much it should matter or not, but it should be established form the start. I would not have conceded the win when I had zero chance and would have lived another round (therefore TINT would have gotten another round of gambit) and he could have collected more gambit in one of the rounds if it was a large factor in things. because conceding before the end should not really happen if the actual points (beyond the 3 for winning) play a part in rankings Read Bold Print
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
|
shmi15 wrote:jen'ari wrote:shmi15 wrote:TimmerB123 wrote:Btw, not that it matters here - but that is not how ranking works. Gambit score plays no part it it whatsoever. It should matter... It seems to make the most sense. If not, oh well, consider this my official " Power Rankings" I dont know how much it should matter or not, but it should be established form the start. I would not have conceded the win when I had zero chance and would have lived another round (therefore TINT would have gotten another round of gambit) and he could have collected more gambit in one of the rounds if it was a large factor in things. because conceding before the end should not really happen if the actual points (beyond the 3 for winning) play a part in rankings Read Bold Print I read it before. I am just discussing the philosophy of gambit and scoring. I did not really side one way or the other. just throwing out the idea that it would be unfair if we threw that in there when I conceded before all the points could be gleamed heck he could leave me with 20 points and let me kill all his pieces except jango and gain gambit for the next 6 rounds that take 3 minutes each if he gambit points played a huge huge part and ended with 290. just saying. as far as power rankings. You most definitely cannot power rank from gambit points. Some people just have really hard match-ups. you really think that McNizzle's cloaked grenades is bottom tier? or that you are 3rd? (thuglife)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,291
|
jen'ari wrote:shmi15 wrote:jen'ari wrote:shmi15 wrote:TimmerB123 wrote:Btw, not that it matters here - but that is not how ranking works. Gambit score plays no part it it whatsoever. It should matter... It seems to make the most sense. If not, oh well, consider this my official " Power Rankings" I dont know how much it should matter or not, but it should be established form the start. I would not have conceded the win when I had zero chance and would have lived another round (therefore TINT would have gotten another round of gambit) and he could have collected more gambit in one of the rounds if it was a large factor in things. because conceding before the end should not really happen if the actual points (beyond the 3 for winning) play a part in rankings Read Bold Print I read it before. I am just discussing the philosophy of gambit and scoring. I did not really side one way or the other. just throwing out the idea that it would be unfair if we threw that in there when I conceded before all the points could be gleamed heck he could leave me with 20 points and let me kill all his pieces except jango and gain gambit for the next 6 rounds that take 3 minutes each if he gambit points played a huge huge part and ended with 290. just saying. as far as power rankings. You most definitely cannot power rank from gambit points. Some people just have really hard match-ups. you really think that McNizzle's cloaked grenades is bottom tier? or that you are 3rd? (thuglife) What des your rankings look like after round 1?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/20/2015
Posts: 1,243
|
shmi15 wrote:7 games of the 9 reported for round 1
1. Spry -1-0 3 points (246 gambit)
2. Thereisnotry 1-0 3 points (230 gambit)
3. Shmi15 1-0 3 ppints (208 gambit)
4. PNKTD 1-0 3 points (205 Gambit)
5.UrbanSHmi 1-0 3 points (203 gambit)
6.UrbanJedi1-0 3 points (202 Gambit)
7. Ultrastar - 1-0 2 Points (46 Gambit)
8.. Dart_jim 0-1 1 point ( 166 gambit)
9.DarthO 0-1 1 Point ( 136 gambit)
10. Caedus 0-1 1 point ( 125 gambit)
11. Naarkon 0-1 1 point ( 122 gambit)
12. TimmerB 0-1 1 point (110 gambit)
13. Jan'ari 0-1 1 point (108 gambit)
14. McNizle -31 0-1 0 points (31 gambit)
Are we really passive aggressively squad shaming in this regional? Classy
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,291
|
Caedus wrote:shmi15 wrote:7 games of the 9 reported for round 1
1. Spry -1-0 3 points (246 gambit)
2. Thereisnotry 1-0 3 points (230 gambit)
3. Shmi15 1-0 3 ppints (208 gambit)
4. PNKTD 1-0 3 points (205 Gambit)
5.UrbanSHmi 1-0 3 points (203 gambit)
6.UrbanJedi1-0 3 points (202 Gambit)
7. Ultrastar - 1-0 2 Points (46 Gambit)
8.. Dart_jim 0-1 1 point ( 166 gambit)
9.DarthO 0-1 1 Point ( 136 gambit)
10. Caedus 0-1 1 point ( 125 gambit)
11. Naarkon 0-1 1 point ( 122 gambit)
12. TimmerB 0-1 1 point (110 gambit)
13. Jan'ari 0-1 1 point (108 gambit)
14. McNizle -31 0-1 0 points (31 gambit)
Are we really passive aggressively squad shaming in this regional? Classy What?
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
|
Tracking points above 200 makes no sense whatsoever. If you reach 200 you have a full win. Once you hit 200 you don't get another round to earn more than that.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/12/2010
Posts: 564
|
Shmi15 is just doing this for his own personal Power Rankings. It has no impact on pairings. His Power Rankings he is using Victory Points as well as points earned and win loss record to determine who goes where. No harm done. Im looking forward to seeing where everyone ends up Week 2. Also I would love to see others Power Rankings.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
|
shmi15 wrote:jen'ari wrote:shmi15 wrote:jen'ari wrote:shmi15 wrote:TimmerB123 wrote:Btw, not that it matters here - but that is not how ranking works. Gambit score plays no part it it whatsoever. It should matter... It seems to make the most sense. If not, oh well, consider this my official " Power Rankings" I dont know how much it should matter or not, but it should be established form the start. I would not have conceded the win when I had zero chance and would have lived another round (therefore TINT would have gotten another round of gambit) and he could have collected more gambit in one of the rounds if it was a large factor in things. because conceding before the end should not really happen if the actual points (beyond the 3 for winning) play a part in rankings Read Bold Print I read it before. I am just discussing the philosophy of gambit and scoring. I did not really side one way or the other. just throwing out the idea that it would be unfair if we threw that in there when I conceded before all the points could be gleamed heck he could leave me with 20 points and let me kill all his pieces except jango and gain gambit for the next 6 rounds that take 3 minutes each if he gambit points played a huge huge part and ended with 290. just saying. as far as power rankings. You most definitely cannot power rank from gambit points. Some people just have really hard match-ups. you really think that McNizzle's cloaked grenades is bottom tier? or that you are 3rd? (thuglife) What des your rankings look like after round 1? If I was in charge of analyzing the data I would put me in the "low middle" of the pack. Considering I played one of the all time greats who was wielding Kelborn and Vindicated. Also the history of good success Caedus, Barriss, and Exar have together would play a part in the ranking in the middle as well. My power rankings after round 1 would be (without Frenchy, Arrow, Baine, and Rattlehead) 1. TINT 2. Theultrastar 3. Spryguy 4. PNKTD 5. Shmi15 6. McNizzle 7. UrbanShmi 8. DarthO 9. UrbanJedi 10. TimmerB 11. Jen'ari 12. Darth_Jim 13. Caedus 14. Naarkon 15. Kezza (got the bye, squad looks like he will be a high rank) putting into effect "strength of schedule" what the squad looks like. (for instance UrbanJedi has 3 points, but I see no reason to put him above DarthO even though he beat him)
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
|
theultrastar wrote:Shmi15 is just doing this for his own personal Power Rankings. It has no impact on pairings. His Power Rankings he is using Victory Points as well as points earned and win loss record to determine who goes where. No harm done. Im looking forward to seeing where everyone ends up Week 2. Also I would love to see others Power Rankings. True enough. And I do appreciate seeing the standings before the round is over. Thanks for that. Etienne and I are scheduled for Monday night.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
|
theultrastar wrote:Shmi15 is just doing this for his own personal Power Rankings. It has no impact on pairings. His Power Rankings he is using Victory Points as well as points earned and win loss record to determine who goes where. No harm done. Im looking forward to seeing where everyone ends up Week 2. Also I would love to see others Power Rankings. ya, but I would like for him to use a different method than just points and gambit score. It is a shallow way of power ranking. Does not put into play strength of schedule or anything like that. I guess he is a BigTen conference fan, so strength of schedule does not really play a part in those rankings either.. "ka-ching"
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,291
|
jen'ari wrote:theultrastar wrote:Shmi15 is just doing this for his own personal Power Rankings. It has no impact on pairings. His Power Rankings he is using Victory Points as well as points earned and win loss record to determine who goes where. No harm done. Im looking forward to seeing where everyone ends up Week 2. Also I would love to see others Power Rankings. ya, but I would like for him to use a different method than just points and gambit score. It is a shallow way of power ranking. Does not put into play strength of schedule or anything like that. I guess he is a BigTen conference fan, so strength of schedule does not really play a part in those rankings either.. "ka-ching" I think your just mad that you lost round 1..... I have good feeling you will win round 2 Jen'ari, Looks like you and McNile will be playing each other  Maybe you can climb the rankings for being 0-2 haha! And P.S. The Big10 is the best, and Michigan is amaing. Are you a Bama fan Craig?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
|
shmi15 wrote:jen'ari wrote:theultrastar wrote:Shmi15 is just doing this for his own personal Power Rankings. It has no impact on pairings. His Power Rankings he is using Victory Points as well as points earned and win loss record to determine who goes where. No harm done. Im looking forward to seeing where everyone ends up Week 2. Also I would love to see others Power Rankings. ya, but I would like for him to use a different method than just points and gambit score. It is a shallow way of power ranking. Does not put into play strength of schedule or anything like that. I guess he is a BigTen conference fan, so strength of schedule does not really play a part in those rankings either.. "ka-ching" I think your just mad that you lost round 1..... I have good feeling you will win round 2 Jen'ari, Looks like you and McNile will be playing each other Maybe you can climb the rankings for being 0-2 haha! And P.S. The Big10 is the best, and Michigan is amaing. Are you a Bama fan Craig? As a, once very competitive, man I have my misgivings about losing. But if I was going to lose, I am glad it was against a fun squad and that I tried to win, haha. I have more misgivings on not being able to play the squad right than I do losing. If I had competed better and lost I wouldn't feel bad. I don't think it is the squads fault that I lost, which means it was mine, so that part sucks. So why don't you stop being lazy and actually try to power rank instead of throwing out a list based off of points and gambit? I know you barely played sports growing up, but even at the level you played at I am sure they had power rankings right?
|
|
|
Guest |