RegisterDonateLogin

Do not defy the Bloo Milk, Master, not again.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Is the game fun? Options
jen'ari
Posted: Monday, October 15, 2018 9:51:45 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
I know we are in the dead period of the game right now. Butt I thought it was time to bring up a discussion (that will most likely be ignored).

We are seeing scheduled get togethers with disclaimers and even rules/restrictions against being ultra competitive.

It begs the question, what can be done to make ultra competitive fun?

Is it the atmosphere of ultra competitive itself? Like people making sure there is speed of play, no take backs if someone declares something, etc.

Or is it that the game itself at the most competitive level is not fun. 25 activations, can't Target, auto damage, can't use force, etc?

Are people content playing casual all year and then being competitive for one day?
As in, they would get burned out of they played ultra competitively all year.
Since I don't get to travel and haven't met people I don't know where they stand.

It stands to reason to want ultra competitive to be the most fun way to play
adamb0nd
Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 6:16:59 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,298
I'm in favor of 2.0. I know it won't ever happen, but we have all the tools and wisdom now that we didn't then to do it right.
TimmerB123
Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 6:45:59 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
Yes, the game is fun!

For me ultra competitive is the most fun, but I recognize that it is not the most fun for everyone.

I also like to shake things up and do something different once in a while.

Regionals all have the same format, and far and away the most miniatures that gets played in tournaments these days are the regionals.

Some people play casual squads at regionals, but anyone at anytime could play their best possible squad.

I made an alternate format tournament simply have something different to do. A new, fun squad building challenge. Not because ultra competitive isn't fun.

It allows us to look at new combos and see new pieces on the board.



If ultra competitive wasn't fun, I wouldn't play the game.
jen'ari
Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 10:29:10 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
I can kind of understand something different to do if I played all the time. I don't know how much others get to play on the regular. I only get to play on vassal.

But if I didn't get to play regularly I would want the times I did get to play to be the pure game.
TimmerB123
Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 8:15:28 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
jen'ari wrote:
I can kind of understand something different to do if I played all the time. I don't know how much others get to play on the regular. I only get to play on vassal.

But if I didn't get to play regularly I would want the times I did get to play to be the pure game.


I can fully see that.

The group that is coming are the people that hit multiple regionals, so I thought it would be a fun challenge. I hope it is!
adamb0nd
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 7:15:42 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,298
The game is fun for me. But i also have the benefit of being a player since 2006.

I am actually going to teach a friend how to play tonight. I've been building simple 100 point squads to try and ease him into the basics of the game. What i've noticed is I need to keep almost entirely to WOTC pieces. The V-sets contain very complex characters, especially uniques. I was trying to pic some iconic characters. For example, I was hoping to build him a FA themed squad, as I know he likes BB-8, Rey, old Han and chewie. Those V-Set pieces are decked out in SAs and synergy. It's just overwhelming enough for a player like me who is familiar with the basics and abilities. I just think its a lot and not great for new/casual. Likewise, can you imagine trying to play a rogue one squad without having many games under your belt? Even at 100pts its a lot to wrap your head around. That being said, I don't think there's anything that can be done about it, other than release characters that are more elegently designed and non-competitivly viable, unless some phase out system is used like in many other expandable games (which also sucks).

FlyingArrow
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 7:30:26 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
Quote:
I was hoping to build him a FA themed squad


What's a FlyingArrow themed squad?
jen'ari
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 7:31:53 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
Then i can see the "restrictions" as being fun.
I can think about it like playing Soccer with a few different rules from time to time. Fun to have a different dynamic, but only sometimes.

@adam, One of my problems with "overloaded" cards is that a lot of the time overloaded cards are still not powerful. It seems the "synergies" are just there to try and create theme (which I do not think they do). Some of our most powerful pieces are pretty straight forward pieces with one or two tricks. (Ganner, R2, Thrawn, Bastila, etc).

They do not stat with a 6 attack that with +2 Synergy get to an 8 than +2 synergy get to 10 and than +4 reprisal get to 14 and than +2 from a CE get to a 16.....

I agree, so so many synergies hurt game play. I am a component of Easy to use pieces that are powerful. I am all for Power 8.5 and higher pieces, especially with smaller set sizes.
adamb0nd
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 9:10:21 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,298
FlyingArrow wrote:
Quote:
I was hoping to build him a FA themed squad


What's a FlyingArrow themed squad?


Sorry, Farce Awokened
TimmerB123
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:06:18 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/9/2008
Posts: 4,729
Location: Chicago
adamb0nd wrote:
FlyingArrow wrote:
Quote:
I was hoping to build him a FA themed squad


What's a FlyingArrow themed squad?


Sorry, Farce Awokened


This would be a hilarious parody name for Force Awakened.
wannabe mexican
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 11:04:24 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/10/2010
Posts: 1,153
When introducing the kids at school to the game I had to stick to purely WOTC pieces. I hope they develop into players that can use all the V-Sets though.
adamb0nd
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 11:04:44 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,298
jen'ari wrote:

I agree, so so many synergies hurt game play. I am a component of Easy to use pieces that are powerful. I am all for Power 8.5 and higher pieces, especially with smaller set sizes.


Right. There are plenty of simple but powerful pieces. Flobi and Princess Leia from A&E come to mind.
Darth_Reignir
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 4:33:10 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/3/2010
Posts: 354
adamb0nd wrote:
The game is fun for me. But i also have the benefit of being a player since 2006.

I am actually going to teach a friend how to play tonight. I've been building simple 100 point squads to try and ease him into the basics of the game. What i've noticed is I need to keep almost entirely to WOTC pieces. The V-sets contain very complex characters, especially uniques. I was trying to pic some iconic characters. For example, I was hoping to build him a FA themed squad, as I know he likes BB-8, Rey, old Han and chewie. Those V-Set pieces are decked out in SAs and synergy. It's just overwhelming enough for a player like me who is familiar with the basics and abilities. I just think its a lot and not great for new/casual. Likewise, can you imagine trying to play a rogue one squad without having many games under your belt? Even at 100pts its a lot to wrap your head around. That being said, I don't think there's anything that can be done about it, other than release characters that are more elegently designed and non-competitivly viable, unless some phase out system is used like in many other expandable games (which also sucks).



Did this the other week with a group of 4 other people. Two of them, one a former roommate and the other my girlfriend, had the advantage of already having played a couple times before with me. 100pt vanilla pieces seem the way to go in terms of teaching folks how to play. The teams are varied in complexity and definitely nothing folks here would be considered "good" my any means, but offer newbies a glimpse in how pieces work. One of the players caught on quickly, so we may do some 1v1 games with V-Set pieces later on.

Anyway, just thought it was interesting that I have had a recent similar experience as adamb0nd. Cheers.
EmporerDragon
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 5:47:56 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
I went a slightly different route last time I taught a group: I went with WotC 150 point squads. The main reasoning for 150 was that I was able to make squads around central themes. I was able to whip up around 2 dozen different thematic squads of generally equal power which allowed everyone to pick characters or squads that they liked.

I don't have the exact cards sorted out anymore, but I still do have a pic of all the squads together:

FlyingArrow
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 5:56:35 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
For the very first teaching skirmish I go even smaller.

Han Solo (RS)
Elite Rebel Trooper
Rebel Trooper x3

Stormtrooper Officer
Elite Stormtrooper
Stormtrooper x5

50pt squads.

Played on a map turned sideways for quicker engagement.
jen'ari
Posted: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 6:54:49 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/3/2014
Posts: 2,098
FlyingArrow wrote:


Played on a map turned sideways for quicker engagement.


Map turned sideways could be very interesting.
kobayashimaru
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2019 2:30:14 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/26/2011
Posts: 915
apologies for some benign necro;
this is great stuff to read though on the futures of this awesome game.

"We are seeing scheduled get togethers with disclaimers and even rules/restrictions against being ultra competitive."
Indeed, there is a clearer demarcation between "Pro-League" and "fun".
There is a time-and-a-place for "Play Hard" and win as the game outcome.
codes of conduct, sportspersonship guidelines etc, are all being consolidated,
which weren't actually strictly addressed in the WotC Rulebooks or VSET add-ons. (but rather in the WotC Referee's and Games Masters Guides).

there is also - refreshing to see - "Continuity-specific" tournaments and leagues even.
The participation for Clone Wars only themed stuff is great.
The miniatures folks use as proxies and customs, that is also being kicked up a notch or several.
There is a real irony - it may be that,
the "bendy-plastic originals" will be entirely replaced by other kinds of model kit.
We then have a "Ship of Theseus" scenario on many levels to the game creepin' in.

"is it that the game itself -- at the most competitive level -- is not fun."
there is a partial "hobson's choice auto-include' factor to squad composition reminiscent of Chess compositions;
there are only a few squads, and a few maps, in competitive SWMinis.
it then becomes "Scissors Paper Rock" within the round-robin structure, which is as fun as watching
the SWMinis VASSAL 'cellular automata"/ "SWMinisAGI-mode".
If you like Chess, and have an eidetic memory of which moves to make when, that's still fun.
but, it's a far cry from what SWMinis was in earlier eras. when, there was more random mismatching potentials during the round robin,
which made the game less "Scissors Paper Rock".
sure, there were a few auto-loss random mismatches, but,
stuff like a "Glass-Cannon" squad could, if played well, defeat a general all-rounder squad.

"Are people content playing casual all year and then being competitive for one day?
As in, they would get burned out of they played ultra competitively all year.
Since I don't get to travel and haven't met people I don't know where they stand."


There are many ways to SWMinis it up.
Every day can be a SWMinis day (to some extent),
though, the competitive league is 12 weekends outta the 52.
the round robin structure requires people to success at Locals / Regionals or "Division"
Their success at regionals then determines their structure for the nationals.
there's then Internationals and Correspondence,
and 'beyond that', People v AGI etc.

So, from that way of thinking,
it's not possible to only be 'competitive' for one day.
it isn't possible to win the International, Correspondence or "People V AGI digi-VASSAL or Tabletop BoardGame Emulator etc" tournaments,
it's not possible to decide to get up one day on day-of tournament,
get a wildcard entry, and go on to win.
(though, that would be 'fun' to model asymmetrically...).

I do however take the point;
the "retention"/ "spirit of SWMinis" and good gamespersonship, are fundamentals
which will ensure SWMinis becomes a great game played for a very long time.
Playing competitively, doesn't mean being a bad sport / bad gamespersonship about it,
which was a partial source of prior 'fatigue" in interest in the game ---
why bother taking those 12 weekends out of your 52 weeks, to play a game,
when other folks, just want to mug you for your prize support and don't wish to even say "hello" for that.?
there were a few terse periods like that in the 2008-10 seasons, and again in 2016-17.
(in local and at many internationals or online events).
FlyingArrow
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2019 2:45:34 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
I run a tournament with a bunch of beginners. A couple of experienced players stomping all the newcomers with complex squads so they didn't even understand how they were getting crushed would, I'm guessing, be un-fun for them.

But I do like competitive minis with the right crowd.
donnie72191
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2019 7:04:28 PM
Rank: Felucian Warrior on Rancor
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/20/2018
Posts: 53
speaking of tournaments, arrow i messaged you and got a reply from obi1kenobi he doesnt live that far from me either we could get a tournament together.
juice man
Posted: Monday, January 14, 2019 7:50:00 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/5/2009
Posts: 2,240
Location: Akron Ohio, just south of dantooine.
Kobay, first post since May, good to see you haven't lost a step.Flapper BigGrin

The game stopped being fun a couple years ago. There are too many SAs, FAs and CEs that can counter specific stuff. It causes delays in game play trying to figure out what can be used and what can't in certain specific instances.

Kinda like Star Fleet Battles, if anyone remembers the headache that game became.
I still liked going to the close tourneys for the people, the game was secondary.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.