|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/2/2018
Posts: 186
Location: Wisconsin
|
Is movement required to use this special ability?
The glossary does not specify, like it does on similar abilities. Then again, it could've just been Battering Charge +10 if it needed movement.
Battering Assault +10 Glossary Text:
Instead of taking its normal turn, this character can move up to double its Speed, then attack each adjacent target once at +10 Damage. Determine legal targets before making the first attack roll. Huge or smaller characters hit by this attack are pushed back 2 squares from this character; Push movement does not provoke attacks of opportunity.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
|
Yes, movement is required.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/2/2018
Posts: 186
Location: Wisconsin
|
This should be updated in the glossary then.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/2/2018
Posts: 186
Location: Wisconsin
|
Why make a new ability if it plays the same as Battering Charge?
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
|
N3rdSl4y3r wrote:Why make a new ability if it plays the same as Battering Charge? Looks like QC fail. I'd poke fun at them if I were you.  I'd join you if I weren't one of them. 
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/10/2010
Posts: 756
Location: The Shadowlands of Kashyyyk
|
N3rdSl4y3r wrote:Why make a new ability if it plays the same as Battering Charge? Idk, why did someone create Charging Fire +10 when we already had Charging Fire?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/2/2018
Posts: 186
Location: Wisconsin
|
FlyingArrow wrote:Looks like QC fail. I'd poke fun at them if I were you. I'd join you if I weren't one of them. I’m not trying to knock the QC team, but my thought is that they intended it to play different since they made it a different ability.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
|
N3rdSl4y3r wrote:FlyingArrow wrote:Looks like QC fail. I'd poke fun at them if I were you. I'd join you if I weren't one of them. I’m not trying to knock the QC team, but my thought is that they intended it to play different since they made it a different ability. After talking to some other people (thanks gandalf) - you are right that they are different. The difference: * Battering Assault explicitly disallows the lawnmower effect. * Battering Assault is only for adjacent targets. Battering Charge would work for all targets if it were on a nonmelee piece. Admiral Raddus hands out Battering Assault, potentially to a nonmelee piece, which is why Battering Assault was invented in the first place.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/2/2018
Posts: 186
Location: Wisconsin
|
Thanks for the deep dive into this. It makes sense now, but obviously had me confused!
|
|
|
Guest |