|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/30/2009
Posts: 1,389
Location: New Zealand ( kind of by Australia)
|
It's not that I think the moderators don't do a good job ( heck, it's the exact opposite) but I think this would make things a lot more interesting.
Let me know what you think...
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/8/2009
Posts: 149
|
I don't see why we can't trust the system as is. Besides, a voting system could easily lead to just the more popular people being nominated, not necessarily the most competent.
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
|
Weaver wrote:I don't see why we can't trust the system as is. Besides, a voting system could easily lead to just the more popular people being nominated, not necessarily the most competent. I agree with this.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/9/2009
Posts: 936
Location: Southern Illinois
|
I see enough politicians elected into office that can't do the job. I don't want mods put into place that can't either 
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 4/17/2008
Posts: 254
Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
inseed
I'm for one glad there are Finally mods doing stuff!
but
I think it's a privately owned site and should be up to it's inner circle of participants to choose who has what athority
That doesn't precluse "Us" from offering suggestions.. I just don't think a popularity contest is the way to make mods
|
|
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
|
Absolutely not. Modding is a position that should be inherently unpopular. You can't have mods be hesitant to do their job because it would be unpopular. They should only be answerable to one person: Shinja.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 12/22/2008
Posts: 325
Location: wisconsin
|
bad idea this is, good come from this there will not
|
|
|
Guest |