RegisterDonateLogin

Everything is under control. Situation normal.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

General obi-wan kenobi Options
charleshiltz21
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:03:07 AM
Rank: Ugnaught Demolitionist
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/8/2010
Posts: 3
is gowk banned somebody told me it was but i could never find a banned listMellow
Cordova
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:05:21 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/2/2009
Posts: 177
He was. However he is now legal for DCI play, but Soresu Style Mastery has been errated to be against non-melee attacks only.

Link:
http://www.wizards.com/dci/downloads/SWM_FLR_26Jan10_EN.pdf
erictedders
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:05:27 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2010
Posts: 253
Location: NJ
No, though slightly modified. I believe his Soresu style blocks only ranged attacks.
cymonguk
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 3:05:32 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/20/2010
Posts: 113
It used to be banned in DCI play, but was recently brought back with an errata. the errata being that GOWK's Soresu Style mastery no longer works against melee attacks.
RannKonnar
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 4:05:45 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/17/2008
Posts: 761
Location: Indianapolis, IN
yeah, i only got to use his awesome soresu once, before he was Sad banned.
LoboStele
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:22:03 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/3/2008
Posts: 584
Location: Cincinnati, OH
It's technically not an errata though. His stats still remain as printed on the card for casual play. It's just that in DCI play the ability works differently. If it was an actual errata, it would be listed on WOTC's site with the other game errata. Minor difference, I know, but figured it was worth printing out.
Beast
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:29:14 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/23/2010
Posts: 92
LoboStele wrote:
It's technically not an errata though. His stats still remain as printed on the card for casual play. It's just that in DCI play the ability works differently. If it was an actual errata, it would be listed on WOTC's site with the other game errata. Minor difference, I know, but figured it was worth printing out.

I did not know thatBlink Thats AWESOME
Cordova
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:43:31 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/2/2009
Posts: 177
Good point... in casual games he is as printed...
erictedders
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:52:12 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2010
Posts: 253
Location: NJ
Now I know that I'm going to take heat for this, but I heard that the reason they even modified the erratta to remove him from play was because the top three champions of the previous year cried when they could figure out how to beat a GOWK with the same squads they used the year prior. Sort of a ban stemming from their innability to adapt to ingenuity.

But I don't want anyone hating me over that. It's actually something one of the owners of the LGS's I go to was telling me. They said they were there, witnessed it and had dismissed the dissent as whining.

Of course I wouldn't know because I wasn't even playing when GOWK was first banned.
Cordova
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:55:29 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/2/2009
Posts: 177
I think the main issue was the fact that he was basically invincible. You could beat him easily sure, if you came prepared, but if not then you faced an uphill struggle.

But hey, a good solution was made, and this is an incredibly dead horse. So it's perhaps best to move on...
erictedders
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:00:20 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2010
Posts: 253
Location: NJ
See, I haven't even been around long enough to know it was such a sore subject. I started playing a little over a year ago and only casually. I've only been doing tournaments locally for the last three, four months tops. So yeah, I was more or less probing the issue to find out how prejudiced my local gaming store owner is with his perceptions. Sorry I tried to do it at the community's expense. Should have just asked outright.
LoboStele
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:11:45 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/3/2008
Posts: 584
Location: Cincinnati, OH
@ Eric: Don't believe everything you hear. That entire account is just flat out wrong. Nobody whined that he couldn't be beaten, and nobody whined that he could only be beaten by one particular thing. Nobody whined period. Some players who are very involved in the community, and very knowledgeable about the game, and are some of the best competitive players in the world, suggested that his influence on the game was so strong, that it upset the balance established by the game. It wasn't that he was unbeatable. It was that he restricted the meta so tightly, that it was either you play-GOWK or you play a counter squad, and that was pretty much it.

You can spend a month probably just re-reading old threads about the whole thing, and the vicious debates back and forth among various players. Suffice to say that I think most people are quite pleased with the current setup.
erictedders
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:21:18 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/6/2010
Posts: 253
Location: NJ
I am, GOWK is still a BEAST. Although, I've always wondered how Obi could be so awesome and Anakin the so called "Chosen One" could be so much less. WOTC just loves Obi I guess.

And now I guess I know how much weight of truth the aforementioned person carries. I'll smile and nod from now on.
NickName
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 8:22:32 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/5/2009
Posts: 190
erictedders wrote:
Now I know that I'm going to take heat for this, but I heard that the reason they even modified the erratta to remove him from play was because the top three champions of the previous year cried when they could figure out how to beat a GOWK with the same squads they used the year prior. Sort of a ban stemming from their innability to adapt to ingenuity.

But I don't want anyone hating me over that. It's actually something one of the owners of the LGS's I go to was telling me. They said they were there, witnessed it and had dismissed the dissent as whining.


The decision was made by WotC, not players, after considering advice from a few people, none of whom were possibly the players you mention. So the account is clearly completely off track.

And I don't hate you. Flapper
Sithborg
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:08:41 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
Yeah, this is going in a BAD direction, and not rules related.
DarthJak
Posted: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:15:49 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/30/2008
Posts: 1,290
Location: Stow Ohio, just north of Dantooine (vacay on Ando)
GOWK always was a 4 letter wordLaugh
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.