RegisterDonateLogin

Fearless and inventive.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Huges gaining Stable Footing? Options
imyurhukaberry
Posted: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:31:33 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,220
Location: East Coast
So I read in the DCI rules that characters with the Rigid SA lose Rigid.

However, I was just listening to a podcast and they mentioned that Huge characters now gain Stable Footing. Is this true? and if so, where was it announced?
(I probably missed something along the way...)
Sithborg
Posted: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:41:51 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
No, this not a DCI legal change.
kezzamachine
Posted: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:30:39 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/23/2008
Posts: 1,487
Location: Lower the Hutt, New Zealand
Actually, similar question... I heard this once and I'm not sure if its right... a huge piece, or large piece, 'squeezes' so that they can get around low objects or difficult terrain? What I mean is: if a large piece (2x2) wanted to get 12 squares away and half of it was completely clear and the other half was difficult terrain, it would then 'squeeze' past it and not incur a movement penalty, yes? Same for a 3x3 facing two rows free and one row of difficult terrain... is that right? Or did someone dream it?
creme_brule
Posted: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:40:55 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/31/2009
Posts: 1,701
kezzamachine wrote:
Actually, similar question... I heard this once and I'm not sure if its right... a huge piece, or large piece, 'squeezes' so that they can get around low objects or difficult terrain? What I mean is: if a large piece (2x2) wanted to get 12 squares away and half of it was completely clear and the other half was difficult terrain, it would then 'squeeze' past it and not incur a movement penalty, yes? Same for a 3x3 facing two rows free and one row of difficult terrain... is that right? Or did someone dream it?


IMO that's not correct. any part of a huge touching cover counts as x2 movement, and likewise provides cover...you have to take both, not one or the other =D
Sithborg
Posted: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:47:14 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
kezzamachine wrote:
Actually, similar question... I heard this once and I'm not sure if its right... a huge piece, or large piece, 'squeezes' so that they can get around low objects or difficult terrain? What I mean is: if a large piece (2x2) wanted to get 12 squares away and half of it was completely clear and the other half was difficult terrain, it would then 'squeeze' past it and not incur a movement penalty, yes? Same for a 3x3 facing two rows free and one row of difficult terrain... is that right? Or did someone dream it?


Incorrect. You can only squeeze through an area if the smaller area "path" is created by walls or pits. You cannot squeeze around characters, or to get around terrain that slows your movement. This is covered in the rulebook.

This is not the place to discuss various strengths of a podcast.
imyurhukaberry
Posted: Thursday, May 27, 2010 3:57:53 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,220
Location: East Coast
Sorry...I believe they were discussing a league rule they use locally. I just happen to hear it while at work and not paying full attention thought they were discussing an actual change to the rules.

"These are not the droids you were looking for. Move along...move along."
Chargers
Posted: Friday, May 28, 2010 3:38:48 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 9/1/2008
Posts: 818
Location: Wisconsin
Nope, Huk, you didn't hear that wrong. That was my mistake. While discussing Stable Footing, I incorrectly said that applies to Huges. It does not.

Sometimes in our league play, we will have specified events where Huges get it. But we weren't discussing league play. I just got confused. Huges lose Rigid in DCI play. Logically, I think they should also gain Stable Footing, but they don't.

We will errata ourselves in the next episode. Thanks for pointing out our goof. ThumpUp
imyurhukaberry
Posted: Friday, May 28, 2010 5:12:33 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/8/2008
Posts: 2,220
Location: East Coast
I was really hoping it was a real errata...but just making sure.
We sort of used it as a house rule...but along with that we say that Huge characters do not gain cover from low objects.
Thanks Tim for clarifying all that!
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.