RegisterDonateLogin

Has been fought over since the formation of the Republic.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

The Infamous V-Sets Options
qvos
Posted: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 5:24:29 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/26/2009
Posts: 1,382
Location: Detroit, Mi
Mando-Matic, If your main point is to say that a seperate function button for the vsets would be nice, then yes, by all means, it might be nice.
If your point is that the V-sets should not be used, then I guess I don't agree. Essentially what I think you are saying is that the powercreep of the v-sets have overtaken the original minsis. That may be true. I can tell that you have played with the original WOTC, perhaps from early on. Compare the Rebel Storm Pieces, with the AE pieces. Or the Universe pieces with Champions, ect. My point is every set, included pieces that made previous ones obsolete.
Here's something else, The V-set pieces not only make all of the factions playable(I'm sure you'd admit that only a few of the factions could be competitive), but they also open up the playability of pieces which have long sat collecting dust in a box.
The reason some of the guys here take offense at your original statement is because as a whole, the v-sets have been great for the game. There have been some that might be a little overpowered. That has been debated over and over again on theses forums. But even theses pieces are enjoyable to play and have enhanced my experiences playing.
Welcome back to playing and these forums btw. Dissenting opinions are welcome. I think it makes the site fun to see people passionate about the game. But remember that the V-set guys have helped keep the game going. I appreciate all their work!BlooMilk
Mando-Matic
Posted: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8:00:06 PM
Rank: Junk Golem
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/26/2008
Posts: 23
@gvos: My main point is indeed how it would be nice to have a seperate function button for the V-sets when building squads, searching for characters, and, most significantly, when rating squads.

I by no means meant that V-sets should not be used any anyone, only that V-sets are not something that all of us prefer to use. Yes, I am saying that the power creep has over taken a large portion of the original Mini's. You are spot on, I've been playing Mini's ever since Universe was a new set, so I have been able to see how Mini's have slowly evolved. While you certainly make a valid point that the power creep was in every set (except for Clone Strike in my opinion), I just think that the power-creep divide that is clearly evident between actual Mini's and virtual Mini's warrants a divide for rating squads. I say this because a competitive "underdog" faction squad made with purely pre V-set Mini's is deserving to be rated on its own from its counterpart squads with the power balancing V-set pieces. Your point that V-sets make previously obsolete pieces and underdog factions playable is solid: I completely agree. Which is why I'm not advocating that people stop using them, only that they stop being lumped together with squads that don't use V-sets.

I understand why some of the guys have taken offense as V-sets are held dear by most of the active users on this site. However, just because I don't like to use them doesn't mean I think every else should stop using them. I apologize if I came across as condescending towards V-sets and V-Set users. I concur with your point that the V-set guys have helped keep the game going and I too am grateful for that. I also appreciate opposing views and it was my hope that through mutual appreciation of each others views that we could come up with an addition to the site that accommodates everyone. Thank you for the welcome back to the Bloo Milk community and I thank you further for the respectful, insightful, intellectual response- both are greatly appreciated! =)

@Sithborg: Your redirect and referee action is rather appreciated. =)
Sashlon
Posted: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 9:34:46 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/4/2009
Posts: 518
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Apologies

BlooMilk
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 10:03:31 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
One issue I see is a disagreement about what is "actual" and what is "virtual." The v-sets at this point are really only virtual in that they are made and distributed over the internet.

Maybe for some individuals they are not the "real" minis, but the realization of most in the community is that some sort of effort in continuing to make cards is what the game needs to continue. The v-sets need to be seen as legitimate for this to happen, and are doing a good job so far with playtesting and proofreading, etc. Separation of v-sets from the "actual" minis (in the OP's use of actual) harms at least a little this legitimacy.

So yes, they are CALLED virtual cards, but from the perspectives that matter in determining the relationship of the main websites for the game to the game, they ARE the ACTUAL cards just like RS-MotF. Therefore, to expect that on these websites that the game should be carried out in a way that the v-cards be depicted as less legitimate is quite an unrealistic and... hopeful expectationn.

(On a side note, I support v-sets, but I am nauseatingly annoyed with the "don't like v-sets, don't use them" line. One of the main reasons is that it is used on people who often have some sort of feeling that the v-sets are in some way a legitimate continuation of the game according to some authority that they feel they should respect, but they don't like that more cards are being made in which case they feel that THEIR game is being trampled on. Simply "not using them" isn't good enough, because someone else seems to be telling them how to play it. They get a feeling that if they don't play with v-cards, their game would be illegitimate. If a person just thought that v-sets were silly and totally illegitimate, maybe the "don't use them line" would be helpful, but IMO it would be just redundant.)
Sashlon
Posted: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:54:43 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/4/2009
Posts: 518
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Okay, here's the thing;

There are people who will knock the v-set project because they have an axe to grind with other players, and their issues actually have very little to do with the quality of the very-set design. That may or may not be the case here, and my first response was pretty curt.

However, I stand by what I said. If a player or a group doesn't like the v-set designs, they shouldn't use them. I know I wouldn't use them if I had a big problem with them. I don't buy into the idea that the vsets are any more or less "official" than the wotc stuff. That's for individuals and groups to decide. What I don't understand and find exasperating is people who say they dislike the cards,but use them anyway, and then bash them when there's stuff that comes up that irritates them. Like I said, if I had feelings like that about vsets I wouldn't use them at all, and I wouldn't care.

Maybe I'm just being dumb about it, who knowsRollEyes

Sashlon
Posted: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:58:28 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/4/2009
Posts: 518
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Also, the OP is correct, there has been power creep. But that's been happening since set #2. At least now we have power creep for OR, sith, mandos and vong too, and not just the rebels all the time like wotc did.
Mando-Matic
Posted: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:45:26 AM
Rank: Junk Golem
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/26/2008
Posts: 23
@AdmiralMotti89: If you are upset over the terms "actual" Mini's vs. "virtual" Mini's, how about replacing actual with WOTC? So then it will be WOTC Mini's vs. Virtual Mini's and we can distinguish between the two groups without making the latter less legitimate. I just looked and I never saw the line "don't like V-sets, don't use them" line anywhere in my posts, so I am confused where you got that from. Contrary to your hypothesis, I do not feel that my game is being trampled on, I don't feel that someone is telling me how to play, and I don't at all feel that not using V-sets makes my game illegitimate. I prefer not to use them and all I'm asking for is for there to be a separate rating category for squads without V-set Mini's. An option that makes V-set Mini's not show up when building squads would also be appreciated, but other than that I"m not trying to make any other message.

@Sashlon: First of all, thanks for your apology. Secondly, I assure you that I am sincere and my posts are purely motivated by the topic. I have no axe to grind.

I also assure you I am not one such individual that uses V-sets and then complains about them. If you look at my squads, you will not find a single V-set Mini in any of them, but that is beside the point because it is not my intent to use this thread to complain about V-sets. What is my intent is to use this thread to lobby for V-set squads and WOTF-only squads to be rated separately. I don't think you're being dumb. =)

Your point about the power creep for the minor factions helps balance things out is correct, which is actually one of the reasons I think separate rating categories are warranted- a Sith faction squad that is competitive without using the balancing V-set pieces should be rated separately from competitive Sith faction squads that do use them.
AdmiralMotti89
Posted: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:38:16 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/29/2009
Posts: 496
Location: Nebraska
Mando to be clear the "don't like it don't use it" is what I saw in at least one RESPONSE to your posts, not your posts.
Monsterkhan007
Posted: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:46:30 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/16/2012
Posts: 63
I have used both the "FAKE" mini's and the REAL ones and the FAKE ones are all broken regardless of whether or not they bring factions up to par. The fake ones destroy any and all of the real mini's. Show me a squad these days that doesnt carry at least one or more "v-set piece that isn't top tier. They are few and far between these days. As for your so called "V-sets" carrying on the game and increasing interest in the game I laugh at that. True it makes it cheaper to field a squad "which I doubt is true some minis have increased in price due to it" and the fact that u can use ANY piece in place as a proxy is totally irritating I started playing SWM about a year ago and I didn't even know they existed till about a month ago and neither did any of my friends till I did some research on the web so far I have noticed that a lot of the people I play think the same way, that the v-sets are broken. Interesting that some of them are people that play in regionals and even gencon makes u go hmmmm. V-sets have soured me and most of the group I play with on the game entirely some of my friends won't even play on vassal due to the overload of V set pieces in play and a couple have quit entirely so yea v sets way to go may u make 10 more to totally overload the game with abilities and force powers to the point u need a photographic memory to remember every thing. ROFLOL well I said my peace may it rest in peace as the game soon will at this rate
EmporerDragon
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 12:13:36 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/26/2008
Posts: 2,115
Location: Watertown, SD
The V-sets are not broken.

Look at it his way: If you add new cards to a game, they need to be able to shake up the top tier. Otherwise, anything added won't be used because what is top tier would be unchanged.

What makes it seem like the vsets are overpowered is that the designers have thrown away the need for collectability, which is a good thing, as it removes the need for bad pieces. They don't have to throw in an equivalent to the Klatoonian Enforcer or a Mon Cal Knight for the sake of getting people to buy more to get the good stuff.

What all this means is that each set, instead of giving only a half-dozen pieces capable of shaking up the meta, now is giving closer to 50. The result of that is that the meta has expanded so much that you can no longer sit down and expect to face only 3-4 different core squads; Instead, it's a complete mystery what you might face, and that to me makes the game far more enjoyable.

As for the new stuff obsoleting the old, look at what's being obsoleted though, characters like Dr. Evazan and Carth Onasi, who were already obsolete the moment they left the factory. Ask yourself this: Did you ever really use those characters? Did you ever sit down to build a squad and go "Man, Biggs Darklighter or Calo Nord would really round out this team."? Besides, the old stuff is not forgotten. A good chunk of the V-stuff brings the old stuff back into the spotlight, like how Niles Ferrier brought Defels onto the table and Rom Mohc did the same for Dark Troopers.

Also, as for needing a photographic memory, this game is still so simple compared to most other games of it's nature. Look at the old Star Wars CCG. By the time the last official set came out, the glossary alone clocked in at over 200 pages. And you needed to have it all memorized if you wanted to play competitively.
CerousMutor
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 1:48:52 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/27/2008
Posts: 990
haters gona hate

Long live SWMinis
komix
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 2:27:25 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/19/2009
Posts: 178
Location: Earth
Monsterkhan007 wrote:
I have used both the "FAKE" mini's and the REAL ones and the FAKE ones are all broken regardless of whether or not they bring factions up to par. The fake ones destroy any and all of the real mini's. Show me a squad these days that doesnt carry at least one or more "v-set piece that isn't top tier. They are few and far between these days. As for your so called "V-sets" carrying on the game and increasing interest in the game I laugh at that. True it makes it cheaper to field a squad "which I doubt is true some minis have increased in price due to it" and the fact that u can use ANY piece in place as a proxy is totally irritating I started playing SWM about a year ago and I didn't even know they existed till about a month ago and neither did any of my friends till I did some research on the web so far I have noticed that a lot of the people I play think the same way, that the v-sets are broken. Interesting that some of them are people that play in regionals and even gencon makes u go hmmmm. V-sets have soured me and most of the group I play with on the game entirely some of my friends won't even play on vassal due to the overload of V set pieces in play and a couple have quit entirely so yea v sets way to go may u make 10 more to totally overload the game with abilities and force powers to the point u need a photographic memory to remember every thing. ROFLOL well I said my peace may it rest in peace as the game soon will at this rate


Whoa! Hold your horses right there!

The fact that u don't like the thing, that we can use ANY piece in a place as a proxy is just........STRANGE. I mean, u get, that we can't produce minis for legal reasons? I like it, because now we can create our own minis (some better some worse, but it is still FUN to use proxy which u created from bottoms up). Firstly, now u don't have to overpay for a piece of plastic (i'm still waiting for my Skiff for a deacent cost). Secondly, each piece now not only is new, but is also competetive, and we don't get crappy fillers for each faction.

U say that Vsets destroy old ones. That's not entirely true. I mean, of course newer pieces are better than the old ones, but that's just the way it goes. Look at RS minis and compare them to CotF or IE. Do u see it? Only difference now is, that we don't get uniques that do nothing (look at MotF, beside Ganner all were really crappy). As I mentioned before it isn't true. Pieces like Mohc, Weir, Poggle, Klatoonian Captain bring old, dusted ones back to game. Of course, in order to bring nearly all factions back to play (competetive) we had to be given some game changers. Some might say, that they are OP. Many plp are whining about Bastila, but come on what were u saying when u found out Rieekan stats? And this is just an example, I could give u more and more.
I'm not saying that all v-set pieces are super, or that some mistakes haven't been made ( in my mind new Mace should have FR1 for his cost and his abilites, or that new Bao-dur should cost a little bit more~25 and many, many more) but that's just some obstacles that u have to learn to live with.

All in all this is a game, and personally it makes me smile that nowdays with vsets people try new combos each time we play(not just overplayed Han Cannon, Yobuck,Solo Charge or B&B- btw top old squads are still kinda good, so it's not like they have to be put in the box) that game isn't just limted as it used to be, each new piece brings some goodies and finally we get characters which we wanted to see from the start of this game (still waiting for Cloned Palpatine and Imperial Luke LOL ) and redux characters from past which were just collecting dust.

Hate it or not, Vsets have really opened this game to nearly endless possibilies.
DieAndBeMetal
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 4:25:32 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/2/2011
Posts: 131
I love the V-sets. Nuff said.
Biggsy
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 5:13:15 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/12/2009
Posts: 302
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Monsterkhan007 wrote:
I have used both the "FAKE" mini's and the REAL ones and the FAKE ones are all broken regardless of whether or not they bring factions up to par. The fake ones destroy any and all of the real mini's. Show me a squad these days that doesnt carry at least one or more "v-set piece that isn't top tier. They are few and far between these days.

This makes no sense at all. Cry all you want about powercreep and broken minis, but the fact is that it wasn't any different with Wizos in charge. The release of newer sets often obsoleted older minis, that's not a new thing at all. In fact, the vsets do more than Wizos ever did to promote the use of older pieces, either as proxies or by boosting them (Weir, Mohc, Ferrier etc).
Powercreep has also been a part of the game almost from the start, just compare stats and abilities of the newer and older Wizo minis. The powercreep increased with the release of DotF, yes. But that set alone made entire factions playable that wasn't so before. I don't get you people complaining about it RollEyes And the last two sets haven't been nearly as creepy as DotF was i think.

Monsterkhan007 wrote:
As for your so called "V-sets" carrying on the game and increasing interest in the game I laugh at that. True it makes it cheaper to field a squad "which I doubt is true some minis have increased in price due to it" and the fact that u can use ANY piece in place as a proxy is totally irritating

Way to go man. Laugh at peoples hard work to keep the game alive. That's precious ThumbDown If no new sets would be made, the best squads available would remain the best squads - forever. Oh boy, wouldn't that just make the game ever so exciting?
You think new players think it is "totally irritating" that they don't have to shell out a lot of money to get into the game? I don't. I completed my collection long ago, so i have no problem building squads. But i can imagine that newcomers are glad that they can easily make a squad that can actually compete, and not just some ragtag team of random jedi and bounty hunters.

Monsterkhan007 wrote:
I started playing SWM about a year ago and I didn't even know they existed till about a month ago and neither did any of my friends till I did some research on the web so far I have noticed that a lot of the people I play think the same way, that the v-sets are broken. Interesting that some of them are people that play in regionals and even gencon makes u go hmmmm.

What makes me go hmmmm is that your friends can play at GenCon or regionals without knowing about the vsets at all?!

Monsterkhan007 wrote:
V-sets have soured me and most of the group I play with on the game entirely some of my friends won't even play on vassal due to the overload of V set pieces in play and a couple have quit entirely so yea v sets way to go may u make 10 more to totally overload the game with abilities and force powers to the point u need a photographic memory to remember every thing. ROFLOL well I said my peace may it rest in peace as the game soon will at this rate

Photographic memory? The abilities and such are spelled out on the card, it's right in front of you. And again, this is not a vset thing. As far as i recall, Wizos did in fact invent new abilities from time to time BigGrin
Only time will tell for how long the vsets will keep coming. But as it is, they're pretty much the only thing keeping the game going for a lot of people - myself included. You don't have to use them if you don't want to, but whining about them like you do here won't help anyone. If you do in fact want any influence, you might want to bring some constructive criticism to the table instead.
Boris
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 11:10:44 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/18/2008
Posts: 153
Mando-Matic wrote:
@R5Don4: Of course I don't feel like Taung Warrior completed the faction, but I also don't feel like fake pieces do the job either.


I take exception to the phrase "fake pieces." You mean because they weren't commissioned for retail sale? Ironically, I'd say the "fake pieces" got better treatment in design and implementation than anything the "real" stuff did. How many errors have there been in the v-sets, overall? 1? 2? Compare that to when WotC made the game. Can anyone say with a straight face that the game was ever fully playtested before new stuff came out? How many glaring errors were there due to rushed layout?

I'd say the overall product is vastly superior now to any time in WotC's bungled history with the game. Rob was a great designer, and Sarah was successful at marketing with her limited resources. But WotC as a company never did anything to help make their job easier or the product more successful. They crapped on the customers on a regular basis, and despite our repeated efforts to help them make money with the product, they continued to do more and more to sabotage the line until they were finally able to get out of their contract with LFL and make it look like they just couldn't come up with any more ideas. The design team demonstrated in its first attempt how ridiculous that statement was, and what the game could have been if they'd taken it more seriously.
celticindian
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 1:07:14 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/28/2008
Posts: 68
Location: San Diego
I can't even respond without the mods, whom I respect, squishing me. Poop.
saber1
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 1:33:31 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/14/2009
Posts: 1,450
Location: At the controls
Boris wrote:
Mando-Matic wrote:
@R5Don4: Of course I don't feel like Taung Warrior completed the faction, but I also don't feel like fake pieces do the job either.


I take exception to the phrase "fake pieces." You mean because they weren't commissioned for retail sale? Ironically, I'd say the "fake pieces" got better treatment in design and implementation than anything the "real" stuff did. How many errors have there been in the v-sets, overall? 1? 2? Compare that to when WotC made the game. Can anyone say with a straight face that the game was ever fully playtested before new stuff came out? How many glaring errors were there due to rushed layout?

I'd say the overall product is vastly superior now to any time in WotC's bungled history with the game. Rob was a great designer, and Sarah was successful at marketing with her limited resources. But WotC as a company never did anything to help make their job easier or the product more successful. They crapped on the customers on a regular basis, and despite our repeated efforts to help them make money with the product, they continued to do more and more to sabotage the line until they were finally able to get out of their contract with LFL and make it look like they just couldn't come up with any more ideas. The design team demonstrated in its first attempt how ridiculous that statement was, and what the game could have been if they'd taken it more seriously.


Umm, ditto. With the slightest shred of objectivity, it must be said that the editing alone is now far superior to WotC. I think the same can be said for game balance. Bastila up-ended the game, but she doesn't utterly dominate as a squad type as much as Thrawn, Rieekan or BFBH once did.
Deaths_Baine
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 3:42:32 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/31/2010
Posts: 1,628
Well, I would like to bring up one thing.... GoWK. Has anything released in the V-Sets broken the Meta like he did when he came out..No. Want to talk about poor design, take one look at that guy and there you go. Thank goodness the V-Set came along and balanced things out to where GoWK no longers needs to be altered to be fair. Good job designers.
Mando
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 5:09:08 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/14/2008
Posts: 1,410
Location: Chokio, MN
Deaths_Baine wrote:
Well, I would like to bring up one thing.... GoWK. Has anything released in the V-Sets broken the Meta like he did when he came out..No. Want to talk about poor design, take one look at that guy and there you go. Thank goodness the V-Set came along and balanced things out to where GoWK no longers needs to be altered to be fair. Good job designers.


Yeah they did it at the expense of a lot of other squad builds. the firepower I see in squads today is insane. It's common to see stuff shooting at 30-40 dmg a shot now. Not to mention the increaseing amount of twin attack on a lot of peices in recent sets. I like the V-sets, and I playtest them, but this trend towards overpowering mini's has got to slow down. I remeber that having 30hp peices was good, since it would have taken 2 shots normally to kill them. Not so anymore....

The way I see it, the V-sets have set in motion the Imperial beast and the Imperials will be in the same position as the Rebels were prior to the V-sets. Bastilla is a blessing and a curse. I wish the Rebel's hadn't been tossed to the wayside like they have been in all the sets. The Rebels have somehow slipped back to the least competitve faction, IMO. They just don't have the damage output that the other factions now have access to. Han cannon is only 90 dmg with Han and Leia's CE. Compare that to Govenor Tarkin who gives Tyber Zann extra attack for at max 60 dmg a hit. Yeah.....for 22pts. Or Carnor Jax who gets double twin for 30 dmg.....for 22pts. There has been a lot of love shown towards the Imperials. Time for the Rebels to strike back, imho.

sorry for the rant....it's just I've been seeing Bastilla weaken every other faction, except for the Imperials (who were already really good) and they have just filled the vaccum the Rebels vacated.
TheHutts
Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 6:03:05 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/23/2010
Posts: 3,562
Location: The Hutt, New Zealand
Monsterkhan007 wrote:
The fake ones destroy any and all of the real mini's. Show me a squad these days that doesnt carry at least one or more "v-set piece that isn't top tier. They are few and far between these days.


To be fair, urbanjedi just won a Regional with a squad consisting entirely of WotC pieces.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.