RegisterDonateLogin

Has not helped you conjure up the stolen data tapes.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Poll Question : What was the worst movie in your opinion?
Choice Votes Statistics
The Phantom Menace 8 22.222222 %
Attack of the Clones 22 61.111111 %
Revenge of the Sith 4 11.111111 %
A New Hope 1 2.777777 %
Empire Strikes Back 0 0.000000 %
Return of the Jedi 1 2.777777 %

Worst Star Wars Movie? Options
Gungan Batman Clone
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:36:56 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/30/2012
Posts: 835
Location: The Batcave Ota Gotham, Naboo
I'm gonna have to say Attack of the Clones. Again, the romance, it was good for the last hour, but they got the story moving a little too slowly I think. They did dwell too much on Annie and Padme. But, awesome Yoda fight and nice to see the Clones in action. Phantom Menace may have been a little bit of a disappointment, I certainly hope that Episode VII will be better than that. Jar Jar was over emphasized, but Darth Maul (AWESOME!!!!). The way I heard it is that, if you were old enough to remember the Original Trilogy coming out then you didn't like Phantom Menace, but if you weren't then it was fine.
TheHutts
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:40:29 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/23/2010
Posts: 3,562
Location: The Hutt, New Zealand
I can't see why this quiz needs more than 2 options? It's a straight shootout between Episode 1 and 2, surely?
corranhorn
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:41:10 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/14/2009
Posts: 1,728
Yeah, Darth Maul was awesome too. He'd singlehandedly make TPM a great movie if he was handled better.
corranhorn
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 4:41:59 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/14/2009
Posts: 1,728
TheHutts wrote:
I can't see why anyone would vote for anything except Episode 1 or 2?



Some of the old guard are probably still harboring ill will toward ROTJ. Razz
TheHutts
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:01:26 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/23/2010
Posts: 3,562
Location: The Hutt, New Zealand
corranhorn wrote:
TheHutts wrote:
I can't see why anyone would vote for anything except Episode 1 or 2?



Some of the old guard are probably still harboring ill will toward ROTJ. Razz


ROTJ has a few awkward moments. Episode 1 and 2 have a few trainwreck moments.
DARPH NADER
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:11:34 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/29/2011
Posts: 1,246
Location: SWMing now in the 936
Weeks wrote:
I like sand.


I like trains.
Robobob
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:13:14 PM
Rank: Basilisk War Droid
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/10/2010
Posts: 51
corranhorn wrote:
Like I said, though, hate on AOTC as much as you want, but Mace's part was bad ass. No denying it.


That and the Jango vs Kenobi duel are the only watchable parts. I even had issues with the Yoda duel. At the time I thought Yoda flipping around like that was so ridiculous. I always thought a force- only battle was more his style.
DARPH NADER
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:15:08 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/29/2011
Posts: 1,246
Location: SWMing now in the 936
corranhorn wrote:
TheHutts wrote:
I can't see why anyone would vote for anything except Episode 1 or 2?



Some of the old guard are probably still harboring ill will toward ROTJ. Razz


Funny I was going to vote for RotJ because in many respects it was the original let down for me as an 11th grader. However the mannequin like performances of Ani and Ami in AotC were the clincher. Simply awful and very nearly unwatchable. Bomb
Galactic Funk
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:43:40 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 2/25/2011
Posts: 806
Location: Wisconsin
DARPH NADER wrote:
corranhorn wrote:
TheHutts wrote:
I can't see why anyone would vote for anything except Episode 1 or 2?



Some of the old guard are probably still harboring ill will toward ROTJ. Razz


Funny I was going to vote for RotJ because in many respects it was the original let down for me as an 11th grader. However the mannequin like performances of Ani and Ami in AotC were the clincher. Simply awful and very nearly unwatchable. Bomb


Things clearly took a wrong turn in Jedi and never returned to the pinnacle films. That being said there are redeeming qualities in each of those films (6,1,2&3). There are some fantastic scenes and/or characters that we got in each of them. Revenge of the Sith to me is kind of ho hum; it lacks the iconic moments of other films but thankfully avoids the silliness or painful parts that drag down RotJ, TPM and AotC.

For me (as has been covered time and again here) the very worst part of the entire saga are the love scenes between Anikan and Padme. The dialogue and acting are horrid (and because I think Natalie Portman is solid I'm going to lay the blame on Lucas). Thankfully Harrison Ford had the wherewithal to ad-lib the "I know" after Leia tells Han she loves him as he is being lowered into the carbon chamber. Things like that helped to make the first couple films so superior.
Voren_Chalco
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:48:43 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/12/2011
Posts: 234
As a single movie, AotC. Terrible dialogue with clunky delivery clinches it for me. In terms of the Star Wars saga, though, Phantom Menace can be left out with very little lost to the overall story. Finding Anakin and Palpatine becoming Supreme Chancellor are the only important bits of the entire movie and they're not exactly vital to Vader's backstory. That and it sets the timeline way off, especially for Obi-Wan. Living on Tatooine for 19 years apparently makes him age at double speed.
AndyHatton
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:59:54 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 8/9/2009
Posts: 1,935
Voren_Chalco wrote:
. That and it sets the timeline way off, especially for Obi-Wan. Living on Tatooine for 19 years apparently makes him age at double speed.


Ouch poor Alec Guiness...the guy was only playing a few years younger than his actual age. Alec was in his early 60s, Obi-Wan is supposed to be in his very late 50s.


Also not sure how it sets the Timeline off, Luke is still only 19 which implies that Vader was a good guy 19 years before a New Hope
kezzamachine
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:20:26 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/23/2008
Posts: 1,487
Location: Lower the Hutt, New Zealand
I notice there was no option for a) Clone Wars and b) Episode VII. Personally I'd say Episode VII because I haven't seen it yet.
Cassus fett
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:35:34 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/10/2010
Posts: 756
Location: The Shadowlands of Kashyyyk
^ I don't really count the clone wars as it was really just an hour and a half special episode of the show.
AndyHatton
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:37:45 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 8/9/2009
Posts: 1,935
It was still theatrically released...
Cassus fett
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:40:24 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/10/2010
Posts: 756
Location: The Shadowlands of Kashyyyk
^ Eh i'm still not going to count it
FlyingArrow
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:41:00 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
AndyHatton wrote:
It was still theatrically released...


But it's also T-canon. Not that the levels of canon matter anymore... we're all about to get D-canoned and I don't think any of us will like it.
Cassus fett
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:43:14 PM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 6/10/2010
Posts: 756
Location: The Shadowlands of Kashyyyk
FlyingArrow wrote:
AndyHatton wrote:
It was still theatrically released...


But it's also T-canon. Not that the levels of canon matter anymore... we're all about to get D-canoned and I don't think any of us will like it.


Could you clarify?
FlyingArrow
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:44:26 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
Voren_Chalco wrote:
As a single movie, AotC. Terrible dialogue with clunky delivery clinches it for me. In terms of the Star Wars saga, though, Phantom Menace can be left out with very little lost to the overall story. Finding Anakin and Palpatine becoming Supreme Chancellor are the only important bits of the entire movie and they're not exactly vital to Vader's backstory. That and it sets the timeline way off, especially for Obi-Wan. Living on Tatooine for 19 years apparently makes him age at double speed.


The only way it throws off the timeline is because you think you're watching 8-year old Anakin and 17-year old Padme, which makes Episode II even more awkward than its dialogue. Then you find out Anakin was supposed to be 10 and Padme 14 in Episode I.
AndyHatton
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:45:37 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 8/9/2009
Posts: 1,935
FlyingArrow wrote:
Voren_Chalco wrote:
As a single movie, AotC. Terrible dialogue with clunky delivery clinches it for me. In terms of the Star Wars saga, though, Phantom Menace can be left out with very little lost to the overall story. Finding Anakin and Palpatine becoming Supreme Chancellor are the only important bits of the entire movie and they're not exactly vital to Vader's backstory. That and it sets the timeline way off, especially for Obi-Wan. Living on Tatooine for 19 years apparently makes him age at double speed.


The only way it throws off the timeline is because you think you're watching 8-year old Anakin and 17-year old Padme, which makes Episode II even more awkward than its dialogue. Then you find out Anakin was supposed to be 10 and Padme 14 in Episode I.


Yeah who thought electing a 14 year old to be ruler of a planet was a good idea...
AndyHatton
Posted: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:46:58 PM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 8/9/2009
Posts: 1,935
Cassus fett wrote:
FlyingArrow wrote:
AndyHatton wrote:
It was still theatrically released...


But it's also T-canon. Not that the levels of canon matter anymore... we're all about to get D-canoned and I don't think any of us will like it.


Could you clarify?


http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Canon
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.