|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/23/2010 Posts: 71
|
SuperYodaMan wrote:dnemiller wrote:Since none of you can grasp Civil liability or the laws surrounding it, I guess you cannot understand why I would find it necessary to talk to someone I trust abotu stuff posted here. No, I can't understand it because I don't understand how there is any legal "risk" involved. The only way that I can see the V-Sets having any "civil liability" is if 1) you had to get permission from Lucas Films LTD. to produce the V-Sets, which I find unlikely because you're not trying to produce or sell the V-Sets (it's just intellectual property), or 2) you are planning on producing and selling the V-Sets, so you put your own copyright on them that none of us know about. Quite frankly, Mr. Miller, I think you are overreacting. Yes, I agree with you that most of the "higher-up" people on this site are difficult to contact and even harder to get a response from, so I understand your concern there, but that's the case with just about anything else in the real-world; you can't hardly expect to have a CEO or the President on speed-dial, and it's unrealistic to expect immediate responses from the webmaster of a website. It's not unreliability, it's just the way it works; shinja and the other admins have lives outside of this website and can't be expected to keep tabs on everything on their site 24/7. Yes, it's their responsibility, but they have other things to do that take priority. Furthermore, except for the initial threads which you and DarthJak (who, by the way, gave up his powers as moderator today) were feuding on, I have seen few highly-critical comments aimed at you in the threads that are a byproduct of your fallout with BlooMilk; you are not being "crucified" like you imagine you are. If you can't take simple criticisms or deal with your problems in a civil way without exploding at other people with vulgar comments and feeling paranoid about everyone, maybe it is best that you left. Don't get me wrong, I have told DarthJak essentially the same thing as I am telling you here (except in multiple posts and less complex language that he can better understand) and have been just as critical, if not more so, at him than you. I apologize for the unavoidable inconveniences you've had with this website, and I wish you the best in the future. As I've said before, I wish people would just leave this topic alone and let bygones be bygones; griping about things and belittling other people isn't going to solve anything. Shinja is not a president/CEO. And Dean, I really enjoy hearing what you have to say, if that's any consolation.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/3/2008 Posts: 271
|
crazybirdman wrote: . . .aaaand that's why I won't bother registering on Gamers. It might be entirely different over there, but here it seems like he's insulting and punishing everyone, when he's only mad at a few.
QFT
|
|
Rank: Moderator Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009 Posts: 6,457 Location: Southern Illinois
|
Shoto Parry wrote:Shoto Parry wrote:Mod edit: Removed inflammatory comment. sf
inflammatory?? i quoted dnemillers foul post and pointed out that it violated the CoC and asked if it was okay for all members to use such language. how is that inflammatory? my post was removed with notification, yet the troll baits again Your question was valid, however the reasons for leaving Dean's (edited) post in place were spelled out in this forum. This thread was not the proper medium for your question, and leaving it in place would only invite such more questions, and more likely flaming. Anyone who has a question about how forum moderation is being carried out should ask them via bloomail to one (or more) of the moderators.Shoto - I will send you a BM, and will be happy to discuss this issue further with you if you wish - but OFF the forums. -swinefeld
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/4/2008 Posts: 371 Location: Roswell,new mexico
|
dnemiller wrote:
Edit: Anytime TS you and I are on opposite sides.... Well I know I am on the correct side of the issue.
lol interesting how i said one thing about my exprinces and then went on to say that the site is easy to join and how its an issue....
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/11/2009 Posts: 166 Location: Near Mankato, MN
|
Hi, I usually don't comment on the, what seems more and more often feuds on bloomilk. But when I noticed the V-sets stats were taken away, I was kinda upset. I am like most of the users on bloomilk, I come here to read some Blogs, check new stats, and get ideas for squads. I also track my collection here and keep my own squads here.
Now if I understand things Dnemiller took or asked shinja to remove the V-set spoilers from bloomilk, and put them back on gamers where it originated from. Fine. After all he is in charge (if I understand) and is funding the progress of this fallen game, along with the other mods. I respect that, taking time and money out of their day for me and you, I talking to the people that free load to say. These V-sets cost nothing, for you (the average swm player) He isn't selling these cards for money, there free to print off online.
I saw the Exar Kun stats, AND also read the 6-7 pages of hate blogs that followed. I was pretty fed up with the whinning and complaining, questioning EVERY single motive that Billiv, Dnemiller and others had, thinking the worst first. When they did nothing, why question their greed? As if they are doing this for money? I believe they have something called passion. LEARN IT. Undstand where they come from, I bet they are pretty nervous about the whole thing, making minis and trying to preserve this game for the first time, they are learning as they go, like every human on earth, you don't first walk, you crawl. OF COARSE mistakes will happen. Think back to all of the miss prints Wizards had, and they got paid a ton of money to produce minis.
These guys are just starting out, they don't have employee's or funds, or even SUPPORT. (Pointing at the whiners and haters out there). But they haven't given up have they?
Believe me I would like the V-set to come back to bloomilk. Yes I have an account on Gamers, but this is my swm home.
So what is the root problem? How we settle this feud? Finding the root problem is important, so what are the contributing factors causing this problem? What factors those factors? Narrow it down until you have the soul problem, Knowing is half the battle. A lot has gone wrong when people strike out in blind rage, going off rumors or misunderstandings.
These are my two cents, take and do what ever you want with them. If your to rich and don't need them, then this message was probably meant for you.
|
|
Rank: Moderator Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008 Posts: 5,201
|
I'm going to share my personal story. Not so long ago, about a year and a half ago, I wasn't held in high regard by many of the "powers" on Gamers. I was probably as well liked as many of the ones they have complained about in this thread. All the way back to the ol' Gencon vs Pax championship arguement, I had a pretty bad falling out with them. I will take my share of the blame, as I posted a lot more angerly and stuck up than I do now. In fact, what Dean has said about Shinja isn't nearly as bad as some of what he said to me at that time.
Now here we are, I have apparently regained a lot of the respect I lost. I returned from my self imposed exhile to to Gamers, and haven't exploded their forums yet. These relationships can be repaired, it is just going to take time, along with mutual respect and courtesy. If I can do it, I think almost anyone can do it.
|
|
Rank: Moderator Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008 Posts: 5,201
|
greentime wrote:Well, my last half dozen or so posts on this matter got blown away, so I'll just say that so far we are continuing in good stead the SWCCG tradition of having bitter arguments about pretty much everything. The big difference being that most of the SWCCG arguments are actually, you know, about the game.
I can't wait until the first virtual set comes out and we really have something to get angry with each other about.
We already had our Dinelle phase lol. I can definately see some of the similarities though.
|
|
Rank: Moderator Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 5/26/2009 Posts: 8,428
|
Sithborg wrote:I'm going to share my personal story. Not so long ago, about a year and a half ago, I wasn't held in high regard by many of the "powers" on Gamers. I was probably as well liked as many of the ones they have complained about in this thread. All the way back to the ol' Gencon vs Pax championship arguement, I had a pretty bad falling out with them. I will take my share of the blame, as I posted a lot more angerly and stuck up than I do now. In fact, what Dean has said about Shinja isn't nearly as bad as some of what he said to me at that time.
Now here we are, I have apparently regained a lot of the respect I lost. I returned from my self imposed exhile to to Gamers, and haven't exploded their forums yet. These relationships can be repaired, it is just going to take time, along with mutual respect and courtesy. If I can do it, I think almost anyone can do it. Know what's funny? I was sitting here thinking - how can we solve Dean's problem? Shinja isn't responsive enough. One of the mods should be elevated to executive VP or something - someone who can speak for Shinja when he's not available. My first thought was Sithborg - I've never seen him blow up at anyone and he's on as much as anyone, constantly answering (or correcting) things in the Rules forum. I guess I haven't been around long enough to know better! So - um - do any of the mods meet this criteria: * Trusted by shinja enough to be given "executive VP" powers to speak in his stead * Online and responsive enough to satisfy Dean's concern * Good enough relationship with Gamers that the Vsets could be returned to BlooMilk Obviously, Dean and shinja are the only ones who could answer that definitively - but do you think anyone would pass the test?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 1/5/2009 Posts: 2,240 Location: Akron Ohio, just south of dantooine.
|
FlyingArrow- Sound thinking.
Sithborg- Wow, you seem pretty even tempered to me.
greentime- Oh man, oh man I hope not.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/23/2009 Posts: 1,399 Location: MD
|
I honestly just want to move on from this an start talking about minis again. It'd be nice to have the V-Set info back on BlooMilk but I won't be pushing the envelope. I'll keep listening to the three podcasts, going to the four forums, and organizing events. Hopefully everyone will continue in a similar vein, and we can move beyond this issue and get back to talking about the game we all love.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/4/2008 Posts: 1,441
|
@Flying Arrow - that's an idea that isn't new. It was proposed to Aaron by at least 3 different people last year. I hope he takes it seriously this time, but who knows. That's part of the problem on bloomilk, and it's a good solution. Someone has to oversee the mods themselves, and someone has to have accountability for the forums.
The suggestions made last year were for Joelker and/or Sithborg to take on that role.
As for Sithborg's old issue, to be fair about it, Scott wasn't very "even tempered" in the particular issue that cause his departure for a time. But as with anything in life, he worked on it, worked on the relationship, was invited back, and is now a moderator on Gamers again. But Scott has been a much better influence on the game in the longterm, and that more than anything else, repaired the relationship.
@Trappedslider - you were put on notice, because of the WotC history, and posters were concerned that you joined Gamers only to troll the forum. Since you did not do that, you have a clean record, and as you well know, are welcome to post like anyone else. And if TS (sorry Eric but I think you know it's true) can be welcomed onto Gamers and maintain an active account now for 2 years without issue, anyone can do so.
As for current issues, and the perceptions it has created. There are really two kinds of internet fights if you will. The first, are when a game related topic gets heated and people argue in good fun, but it gets out of hand. Those happen all the time for any game, and on just about any active forum. They are in many ways good for the game, as they get people talking, interested, and thinking. They also have a down side, and that's when people use them as a chance to grind axes, or when trolls see them as an opportunity to come out from under their bridge. As long as everyone keeps these in perspective, they are good for the game (doesn't happen often that way though unfortunately - as many people take things way to personally on the internet).
The second, and more annoying fights surround mod issues. Typically these revolve around someone with power on an internet site using it to start/continue fights. These are a major issue, and one of the things on the internet that annoy me the most. We've had these on WotC for a time, and that's where the past issues came from. We've had them here as well. Further, mods tend to have friends on a site where they post regularly, and they tend to defend their friends more often than act as a good mod. It's just human nature. These can be really nasty because it's so easy for a mod to make sure the evidence of their wrong doing is erased, making the rest of the forum members think that nothing is really wrong. Which brings me to my next point.
@SuperYodaMan - I don't know who you are, but it sure looks like you have no idea what was going on, what's happened in the past on here, and so on. And one of the most annoying realities of the combination of the internet, and the fallacy of the radical individual is that everyone thinks they are capable of making a judgment about everything, whether they know anything at all or not, and have the expectation that their opinion should be valued as highly as those in the know.
Heck, it often seems that the burden of proof is on those making "complaints", as if this were a court case and every other random poster was the judge... I've seen several people tell Dean, myself and others that our "issues" with Bloomilk are "overblown" and other things. You don't know half of what's happened, so your opinion is a waste of time, and what's worse, it's dangerous and borderline insulting. It actually creates as many problems as you think it's trying to solve. This isn't a court case, and we don't have to prove to you random poster that there is an issue to be solved. That's for the mods to determine, and if you've paid attention to the posting of the mods, they've admitted multiple times that there are and have been serious issues on this site that justify Dean's position. You have not been ordained judge, you have not seen nearly enough to make a realistic judgment, and you likely haven't been privy to any of the other information that isn't always present in plain sight. The worst part is, everyone of you who think this is only about recent events clearly have no idea what's going on, as it's about much more than one rogue mod.
So stop judging others for things that you know not. That would be the best way to move forward from this.
That bring me to this. @SWMsTrader - As you mentioned, the root causes are the major issue. Flying Arrow hit one one of them, no accountability for mods. Others are no report button, no supermod to cover the mods only, inconsistent mod practices (one mod telling you how something works, and another doing something completely opposite), lack of mod communication to posters, and a general tolerance of trolling behavior. Further, a mod should never, and I mean never moderate a discussion in which he/she has been taking an active roll in. Even if that mod knows what to do, they should always pass it on to an uninvolved party. That's a basic practice that any forum should follow from day 1, and here we are 2+ years into this forum and it has yet to be put in place.
We have lots of people on Gamers that disagree, and get into blow up fights, just like any internet board. But they are handled very differently, and respectfully by the other mods. Heck, Dennis and I get into a fight about every 6 months over something, and we get over it.
The point of this long post, is that there are a myriad of issues with the bloomilk forums, most of which have been brought up long ago, and have not been addressed. This sends a message that the site cannot be trusted. And whether you personally think Dean shouldn't be worried about copyright infringement or not, is completely irrelevant - the fact of the matter is that he is worried about it. He has to know that he can trust the site, and those in charge. And in the 2+ years of this forum, he has seen little reason to trust it. A lot more than firing (or getting him to quit or whatever story Jak is telling) of one mod has to happen in order to regain that trust.
And finally (and mod's if this is over the line, feel free to remove it) - I want to address Jak's [claim] to the community. Not a single person from Gamers made any kind of threat or ultimatum about the V-sets to Aaron to remove Jak. I believe there were posters (not all Gamers regularly and not myself this time) that asked Shinja to remove him. However, the V-sets have never been used as leverage, and there was never a deal made about this. The two issues are only tangentially related. DarthJak is [misleading] you, the bloomilk community, and his doing so just furthers the point that Dean made the right decision about the future of working with the Bloomilk forums.
I hope that clears some of this up.
Edit - one more thing needs to be said. Asking for mods in the first place was something that many of the "Gamers" folks that some of you have derided pushed for on this site. Further, when you finally got them, Dean and I helped Kenred write the CoC. It might seem like Dean is the bad guy on here, but making such a judgment about him just based on his posts is a very lazy action. You need to realize he has tried repeatedly to help this site grow, and to improve. Do many of you know that when we started talking V-sets, Aaron was one of his first attempted contacts, and Aaron did not want anything to do with the project at that time. I know Aaron is "god" around here to some of you, but the facts of the matter are different. Aaron was invited to have a central roll in the V-set and did not take that opportunity, nor to my knowledge, even return a phone call.
Part of the reason Dean can seem salty here is that he only posts when he sees the community, Gamers, etc insulted. He does not post here in any other fashion, and hasn't for over a year (because for a long time posters were free to abuse him as the DCI rep as if he were not a real person without recourse - one of the reasons you finally got mods to begin with). So in short, he feels unwelcome, and does not regularly post at all. So if you are new, I understand your view, but know that it's extremely limited because of the circumstances, and not in any way reflective of Dean as a person.
I don't care about the "appearance" either. Making your judgments purely by appearance is a very poor way to live. Get to Gamers and see how Dean is there, or better yet, meet the guy in person, and see how much he has given to the game, the community, and even to this website.
mod edit: changed a bit of wording [see above] to be consistent with other edits made in this thread. - swinefeld
|
|
Rank: Octuptarra Droid Groups: Member
Joined: 1/6/2010 Posts: 31
|
billiv15 wrote:@Flying Arrow - that's an idea that isn't new. It was proposed to Aaron by at least 3 different people last year. I hope he takes it seriously this time, but who knows. That's part of the problem on bloomilk, and it's a good solution. Someone has to oversee the mods themselves, and someone has to have accountability for the forums.
The suggestions made last year were for Joelker and/or Sithborg to take on that role.
As for Sithborg's old issue, to be fair about it, Scott wasn't very "even tempered" in the particular issue that cause his departure for a time. But as with anything in life, he worked on it, worked on the relationship, was invited back, and is now a moderator on Gamers again. But Scott has been a much better influence on the game in the longterm, and that more than anything else, repaired the relationship.
@Trappedslider - you were put on notice, because of the WotC history, and posters were concerned that you joined Gamers only to troll the forum. Since you did not do that, you have a clean record, and as you well know, are welcome to post like anyone else. And if TS (sorry Eric but I think you know it's true) can be welcomed onto Gamers and maintain an active account now for 2 years without issue, anyone can do so.
As for current issues, and the perceptions it has created. There are really two kinds of internet fights if you will. The first, are when a game related topic gets heated and people argue in good fun, but it gets out of hand. Those happen all the time for any game, and on just about any active forum. They are in many ways good for the game, as they get people talking, interested, and thinking. They also have a down side, and that's when people use them as a chance to grind axes, or when trolls see them as an opportunity to come out from under their bridge. As long as everyone keeps these in perspective, they are good for the game (doesn't happen often that way though unfortunately - as many people take things way to personally on the internet).
The second, and more annoying fights surround mod issues. Typically these revolve around someone with power on an internet site using it to start/continue fights. These are a major issue, and one of the things on the internet that annoy me the most. We've had these on WotC for a time, and that's where the past issues came from. We've had them here as well. Further, mods tend to have friends on a site where they post regularly, and they tend to defend their friends more often than act as a good mod. It's just human nature. These can be really nasty because it's so easy for a mod to make sure the evidence of their wrong doing is erased, making the rest of the forum members think that nothing is really wrong. Which brings me to my next point.
@SuperYodaMan - I don't know who you are, but it sure looks like you have no idea what was going on, what's happened in the past on here, and so on. And one of the most annoying realities of the combination of the internet, and the fallacy of the radical individual is that everyone thinks they are capable of making a judgment about everything, whether they know anything at all or not, and have the expectation that their opinion should be valued as highly as those in the know.
Heck, it often seems that the burden of proof is on those making "complaints", as if this were a court case and every other random poster was the judge... I've seen several people tell Dean, myself and others that our "issues" with Bloomilk are "overblown" and other things. You don't know half of what's happened, so your opinion is a waste of time, and what's worse, it's dangerous and borderline insulting. It actually creates as many problems as you think it's trying to solve. This isn't a court case, and we don't have to prove to you random poster that there is an issue to be solved. That's for the mods to determine, and if you've paid attention to the posting of the mods, they've admitted multiple times that there are and have been serious issues on this site that justify Dean's position. You have not been ordained judge, you have not seen nearly enough to make a realistic judgment, and you likely haven't been privy to any of the other information that isn't always present in plain sight. The worst part is, everyone of you who think this is only about recent events clearly have no idea what's going on, as it's about much more than one rogue mod.
So stop judging others for things that you know not. That would be the best way to move forward from this.
That bring me to this. @SWMsTrader - As you mentioned, the root causes are the major issue. Flying Arrow hit one one of them, no accountability for mods. Others are no report button, no supermod to cover the mods only, inconsistent mod practices (one mod telling you how something works, and another doing something completely opposite), lack of mod communication to posters, and a general tolerance of trolling behavior. Further, a mod should never, and I mean never moderate a discussion in which he/she has been taking an active roll in. Even if that mod knows what to do, they should always pass it on to an uninvolved party. That's a basic practice that any forum should follow from day 1, and here we are 2+ years into this forum and it has yet to be put in place.
We have lots of people on Gamers that disagree, and get into blow up fights, just like any internet board. But they are handled very differently, and respectfully by the other mods. Heck, Dennis and I get into a fight about every 6 months over something, and we get over it.
The point of this long post, is that there are a myriad of issues with the bloomilk forums, most of which have been brought up long ago, and have not been addressed. This sends a message that the site cannot be trusted. And whether you personally think Dean shouldn't be worried about copyright infringement or not, is completely irrelevant - the fact of the matter is that he is worried about it. He has to know that he can trust the site, and those in charge. And in the 2+ years of this forum, he has seen little reason to trust it. A lot more than firing (or getting him to quit or whatever story Jak is telling) of one mod has to happen in order to regain that trust.
And finally (and mod's if this is over the line, feel free to remove it) - I want to address Jak's lie to the community. Not a single person from Gamers made any kind of threat or ultimatum about the V-sets to Aaron to remove Jak. I believe there were posters (not all Gamers regularly and not myself this time) that asked Shinja to remove him. However, the V-sets have never been used as leverage, and there was never a deal made about this. The two issues are only tangentially related. DarthJak is lying to you, the bloomilk community, and his doing so just furthers the point that Dean made the right decision about the future of working with the Bloomilk forums.
I hope that clears some of this up.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 10/3/2008 Posts: 188 Location: Gotham City, Wayne Manor
|
Theres a very easy solution to this mess, that has been created. You guys read, ok here it is.
I should be given some executive powers. Seriously think about this, you guys that have been working with each other for so long just bicker and argue. I'm not saying you don't have reasons to, because i hinestly don't know or truthfully care.
However SWM's is dieing, its obvious that not as many people are playing since WOTC stopped making them. The true fans though are still hanging in there though, and its honestly so lame for us to log on and read about your arguements you guys are having with eachother. I'm not saying its the guys on Gamer's fault or the guys at bloomilk, however it's truthfully all of the people you guys are trying to help that are suffering. I promise you that some people have given up on SWM's in last couple of days because of your little arguements.
I've never met any of you, however i can say that with out a doubt that bill, dean, and aaron are all fans of SWM's. You guys have helped out in numerous ways over the years, however when SWM's is barley hanging i`n there you guys decide to go seperate ways? As for the idea of getting a VP, it should deffinitly be someone new that does have this long drama with everyone. You should seriously get some new people to helpout. I was kidding when i said have me do it, but we should deffinitly have some new people it could be good for everyone having some new people that aren't partial to either group.
Think about it guys
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 3/27/2008 Posts: 871 Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
As Bill said, the whole "Super Mod" idea was brought up long time ago (and a couple times since) but Shinja evidently doesn't want it to happen. It is a logical idea, but one that won't happen.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/4/2008 Posts: 371 Location: Roswell,new mexico
|
billiv15 wrote:
@Trappedslider - you were put on notice, because of the WotC history, and posters were concerned that you joined Gamers only to troll the forum. Since you did not do that, you have a clean record, and as you well know, are welcome to post like anyone else. And if TS (sorry Eric but I think you know it's true) can be welcomed onto Gamers and maintain an active account now for 2 years without issue, anyone can do so..
lol,its okay i just wish that some times my name wouldn't get dragged into stuff that i have nothing to do with me...and honestly i just wish we could all move on from the past .
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 9/19/2008 Posts: 123 Location: AUSTRALIA
|
*YAWN*...sorry but I come on to read about minis and if there is anything new and a lot of what I see is this same old stuff again.
Not real exciting at all to visit any SWM forum sites anymore...I think this game is 'dead' ie not going forward at all.
|
|
Rank: Sith Marauder Groups: Member
Joined: 11/4/2008 Posts: 899 Location: Farmingdale, NY
|
billiv15 wrote:Further, when you finally got them, Dean and I helped Kenred write the CoC. Technically, you and Dean assisted me in improving the FIRST CoC, the writing and reviewing has been done by me alone (fixing Eroscilles Rule of Thumb). I did take your suggestions into consideration from the first time as a mod that needed to help improve the way people post here. There are problems where a few people decide to go around the CoC, but constant improvements has been made to keep disruptive behaviors to a minimal (or none at all). It wasn't until Joruus_CBaoth pmed me and gave me second recommendations (the full write-up) on improving the CoC, and only then when I take some of his suggestions and improved it to where it is now (replacing every content from the first "Rule of Thumb" except for #3). I want you to know, I am capable in making my own decisions as moderator, and thanks to you and a community member, we have strengthened the Bloomilk community. As said, I cannot give you all the credit in helping me write the CoC because it is also the other who also helped as well without asking for anything. We had poor moderation in the past, but at the time you and Dean have strengthened my views on how moderation goes and I act on the issues within the forums responsibly and weeks later, few of our mods and I act as a team. So to the Bloomilk community members, Bill and Dean were the people that helped guide me as a moderator at the time when 1 member has gotten out of hand. And only then I don't like to see people criticize the 2 people who helped put Bloomilk forums in the right direction. I know V-sets are pulled, but keep in mind we work with Shinja to build a relation in trusting us in order for Gamers and Bloomilk to work together for this community.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/30/2008 Posts: 1,290 Location: Stow Ohio, just north of Dantooine (vacay on Ando)
|
billiv15 wrote:
And finally - I want to address Jak's [claim] to the community. Not a single person from Gamers made any kind of threat or ultimatum about the V-sets to Aaron to remove Jak. However, the V-sets have never been used as leverage, and there was never a deal made about this. The two issues are only tangentially related. DarthJak is [misleading] you, the bloomilk community, and his doing so just furthers the point that Dean made the right decision about the future of working with the Bloomilk forums.
[removed] Anytime my name is mentioned in a negative way, I will respond, and defend myself. BM me for [my side of the story]Mod edits by swinefeld - that conveys the message sufficiently
|
|
Rank: Moderator Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009 Posts: 6,457 Location: Southern Illinois
|
Tread lightly here everyone. I'm going to review the thread again to address some issues, and would rather not have to lock/move it. Edit: thread cleaned up a bit - posters will be notified via Bloomail - sf
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/3/2008 Posts: 584 Location: Cincinnati, OH
|
I agree 100000% with what Bill said above. I also posted some similar enlightening info about Dean and his work over the last 5 years over in the "An Idea: Extended Sets" thread, but I'll re-post it here for reference. Quote:FWIW, I really don't think that anyone is trying to "Hold it over everyones head". I'm truly sorry that it comes across like that in any way. The simple matter is, in order for the community to continue to survive down the road, the players must take charge to see that it happens. So, people who have been involved with the game and the community at large since the very beginning (or at least close to it) are typically going to be some of the best informed people to work on that route. It just so happens that Dean had an official position as the DCI Net Rep before WOTC discontinued the game, so he was already in a position of leadership. So he's chose to continue on in that position.
He's not (and neither is anyone at Gamers) attempting to make a big deal of it. The simple matter is though, someone has to step forward to be the leader, or else it ends up being a slew of people arguing across the internet, with no real progress ever being made.
To date, Dean has made extremely wise choices, IMO. He may have assumed the role of community leader himself to some degree, but he has delegated out almost every bit of responsibility that he can. He's hardly involved in the V Sets at all. He gave some ideas just like the rest of us, but beyond that, has pretty much stayed completely out of things.
In addition, SWMGamers has just simply been around longer, and has had a much bigger role in the community overall. Bloomilk exploded onto the scene, and Shinja picked a perfect time to do it (when swshoebox.com was lagging behind by at least a set), and Shinja really blew the other sites out of the water when it came to the squad builder. So, naturally, this site has attracted a ton of attention because Shinja did just such a fantastic job with the squad builder.
But, when it comes to the game surviving, that depends not on a squad builder, but on a community, and the community depends on not just online forums, but real life tournaments, major events, prize support, and the like. This is what Gamers has been good at providing the last 3 years. We've had consistently close contact with WOTC employees and the Organized Play people when they still supported us. And even after WOTC has gone away, Dean, Jim, and others have tirelessly devoted their time to building contacts and working out deals with places to get prize support for minor conventions and things like that.
So, it really isn't that anyone tries to "lord over" each other or anything petty like that. These guys don't do this work just to be prideful about it. They do it because they love to see the joy in the other player's eyes when they get to participate in a big event. Do you guys realize that Dean played in the Championship this year, and that's the first time he's done so since 2007? I don't remember the specifics, but he's hardly played in ANY tournaments at GenCon during 2008-2010. He basically comes for the weekend of GenCon, just to make sure that all the rest of you have a good time. So, when attitudes that might seem like he's holding something over your heads come out, it's usually simply because somebody makes some snide remark about him or some other well-respected person in the community, without any knowledge or regard to the level of commitment and effort these guys give to game.
These guys are humble about the work they do for our community, they really are. But they are also defensive about it. There is a difference. 9 times out of 10, they are defending the work that other people have done. And we ALL hate other people being negative about anything at all. Negativity in the community (posts bashing other sites/people, posts claiming the game is dying, stuff like that) hurt the community, and so it typically causes these guys, who pour out the hearts/lives for this community, to immediately jump on the issue and defend whatever needs to be defended. Sure, sometimes they go over the line, and doing the "wrong things for the right reasons" isn't a good thing, but we're all human. The key is to focus on and remember the fact that these guys are just doing what they think is for the best of the community. If you truly disagree with that, try to chat with them in a CIVIL manner, and it can usually be sorted out. Most of the time, it's just simply because people don't truly understand everything that goes on behind the scenes. Heck, I'm VERY involved in a lot of the behind the scenes stuff, and I still don't understand everything that's going on most of the time. ;)
Anyways....sorry for the long-windedness. Just thought I'd share some thoughts on it. I honestly think one of the biggest things that will help this stuff go away is for the people who have absolutely nothing to do with it, to just stay out of it. Don't worry about needing to know all the little details. Just focus on discussing the fun aspects of the game, talking about the V Sets, building squads, etc. As for communication between the sites...well, Dean has legitimate concerns for the decisions he has made. I'm a member of the 501st Legion, who walks on very thin ice when it comes to copyright infringement, and has only managed to survive because LFL has chosen to ignore us because of the charity work we do. LFL could come down like a hammer and obliterate the organization at a moment's notice if they really wanted to, because, quite simply, all we do is steal their intellectual property. But LFL has basically told the 501st that they are willing to turn a blind eye, so long as no one is making money off the creation/sales of the armor/costumes. So, this is how it relates somewhat to the V Sets. This is something where we are infringing on LFL's copyrights. If we were planning to ONLY offer downloadable cards that individuals could print out, then it would be no problem. But because we would like to offer nicely printed sets that people could purchase at cost as well, it starts to attract more attention. Then, having the V Sets displayed in the squad builder here, or in the forums starts to attract even more attention. Too much attention, and the entire V Set project could get shut down, and Dean could potentially (though unlikely) have litigious concerns on his hands. I highly doubt this would ever happen, and if I did, I would think the worst we would see would be a 'Cease and Desist', but honestly, none of us want that. So if Dean feels like he can't trust the leadership of this site (Shinja) to be helpful in protecting the game's future interests, then he's just being cautious to make sure that the project will stay safe. He's not using it as leverage to oust Jak, he's not trying to punish the users of Bloomilk. He's thinking long-term, and trying to protect the future of the game overall. If it means not sharing things with Bloomilk for the short-term...well, those are the kinds of tough, unpopular decisions that leaders must make from time to time. Yeah, it sucks, but it's one of those "well, somebody's got to do it" sort of things, OK? EDIT: Whoops, I responded to Jak's comments before it got edited. I've edited my response appropriately.
|
|
Guest |