RegisterDonateLogin

Bloo Milk travels single file to hide its numbers.

Welcome Guest Active Topics | Members

Epic V-Set speculation [SPOILERS] Options
jedispyder
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:16:07 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 3/27/2008
Posts: 871
Location: Cincinnati, OH
FlyingArrow wrote:

Maybe I missed it, but I didn't hear the factions mentioned. I assumed Luke was Super Grand Master Luke and the Rebel was Yoda.

We already have a NR Grand Master Luke, no reason to remake that. Luke is Rebel and Yoda is Republic. How epic could a Rebel Yoda be? He can't attack or anything, it'd just a souped up Yoda of Dagobah which wouldn't be all that great in Dynamic Duo.
Lord_Ball
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:46:07 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
billiv15 wrote:
wannabe mexican wrote:
Also, Luke as the Rebel choice. I think this is the first addition to the game since WOTC dropped us that I actually think was poorly chosen. I just don't feel Luke was that great during the rebel years.


He defeats the Emperor and fulfills the prophecy by turning his Father back. If it weren't for the EU books that took him to ridiculous levels, he would be still considered the most powerful jedi. Remember, Star Wars existed long before the ability to eat a planet was created. But let's no forget, Luke saved the galaxy from the Dark Side, and did so almost entirely on his own.

Now, he isn't just a 100pt Rebel version of the NR Luke GM anyway, so wait until you see him. But for those of us who remember the years where no other jedi could possibly outclass the Luke from RotJ, this character is for us. As for it being "poorly chosen" - I think only your choice of those words was poorly chosen. I understand others will agree with the opinion that Luke "wasn't that great as a Rebel" but the existence of that opinion does not make our choice poor. Luke was far and away the most important character in the Rebellion, and was the obvious choice for an Epic. "poor choice" would imply there were better one's that we ignored. That is patently untrue. Please name one character who fits this. I think you meant something else, but Luke was and is the best Rebel character, and his powers as a Rebel were quite great. I understand some of you, particularly the younger crowd won't accept that.

This post has me fearing more than ever that this is a suped up fanboy version of Luke. While Luke became the "most powerful jedi" his potential was not reached during the Rebellion, going by the Republic ranks he was merely a Knight during the Final Battle in the Throne Room (his TRAINING was complete), hardly a contender for Epic status in my mind.

I will reserve true judgement until after seeing the stats, but I always felt that WOTCs HPU was overpowered for his abilities at that time and that Champion of the Force would have been better suited for a early NR Luke than Rebel.
FlyingArrow
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:19:23 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
billiv15 wrote:

He defeats the Emperor and fulfills the prophecy by turning his Father back. ...

Luke was far and away the most important character in the Rebellion, and was the obvious choice for an Epic. ... Luke was and is the best Rebel character, and his powers as a Rebel were quite great.


The key here being "by turning his Father back". Luke wasn't able to defeat Vader without drawing on anger/dark side. He was utterly crushed by the Emperor.

So for an Epic character, I'd assume the main power would have to be things like super-inspiration of his allies, Enhanced Dark Temptation (both enhanced power and enhanced immunity to turning), withstanding pain, and turning other characters to his side. Not at all what we traditionally think of when we think of a powerful character - in raw power the Emperor clearly had him beat. But in game terms, I could see this add up to a 150+ point character. I'm looking forward to seeing it. In terms of raw power, Luke CotF is about as good as it should get - still clearly less than the 70+ point vaders.

Now that we know we have an Epic Rebel Luke - let's take a shot at 150 points...

Luke Skywalker, Balance of the Force

Cost: 150ish
HP: 140
Def: 21
Atk: 16
Dmg: 20

Special Abilities:
Double Attack, Greater Mobile Attack, Melee Attack
Inspired: When within 6 Squares of an allied force spirit or an ally with a force rating, double this character's Force Renewal and double the number of Force Points this character may spend in a round.
Inspiring: Allies gain Avoid Defeat.
Parry, Mettle
Flurry Attack
Lightsaber Combat 10: Whenever this character avoids damage by rolling a save, the attacking enemy takes 10 damage.
I Will Not Turn: Before this character joins another squad, roll a save. On a save of 6, prevent this character from joining another squad.

Force Powers:

Force 4, Force Renewal 2, Master of the Force 2
Knight Speed
Force Leap
Lightsaber Deflect
Greater Dark Temptation (Force 2: +4 attack, +30 Damage, make a save of 11, on failure join opponent's squad)
Greater Use the Force (Force 2: this character's next two attack rolls count as a natural 20)
Redemption: (Force 2: When this character takes damage, select an enemy within 6 squares. The enemy joins your squad for the rest of the skirmish, save 6)

Commander Effect:
Allies gain Coordination (At the end of this character's turn, an ally with Coordination within 6 squares may immediately move 2 squares.)


(Clarification: That's my speculation - not a spoiler.)

This is probably way too weak or way too powerful for 150ish points, but that's what I came up with in just a few minutes.
billiv15
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:23:02 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/4/2008
Posts: 1,441
Lord_Ball wrote:

This post has me fearing more than ever that this is a suped up fanboy version of Luke. While Luke became the "most powerful jedi" his potential was not reached during the Rebellion, going by the Republic ranks he was merely a Knight during the Final Battle in the Throne Room (his TRAINING was complete), hardly a contender for Epic status in my mind.

I will reserve true judgement until after seeing the stats, but I always felt that WOTCs HPU was overpowered for his abilities at that time and that Champion of the Force would have been better suited for a early NR Luke than Rebel.
Which ones of these characters do you expect to not be "suped up fanboy versions"? As for him becoming a knight, etc, a lot of that has been retconned. Again, I require that anyone who is critical of the choice, please provide the obvious alternative that we missed, and remember that for 25 years of SWs history, there was no other but Luke as a Rebel. Judging by all the stuff that came way later, is not how we grew up. I don't particularly care if you or anything thinks Luke was or wasn't all that as a Rebel, a great many others spent their child hood believing otherwise. Just because Lucas added a great deal of material later that gives you that opinion.

Heck, there was no such thing as a "Grandmaster" for most of my lifetime in Star Wars. Yoda was the only Jedi Master in the Republic, and the death of Palpatine actually meant the end of the Empire, not the end of Bane's Sith.

Just set your expectations appropriately, I don't want to see a bunch of absolutely stupid criticism because you or anyone ignored everything we ever set about this set. I'm so sick of negativity and criticism of very hard work. If we actually get something legitimately wrong, that's fine. But if it's "well I think Luke was never as great as insert fanboy EU ridiculousness here" then I really really don't care for it. By the end of the Rebellion, Luke was the most powerful force user in the galaxy, he was the most powerful jedi, and the most powerful Rebel. I've always questioned why people seem to think that the NR begins the moment RotJ ends anyways. It doesn't. In the terms of our game rules, an after RotJ Luke is legitimately classed as Rebel as much in an NR that doesn't exist.
FlyingArrow
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:32:58 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
At 120+ points, they better all be "suped up fanboy versions" or they're all wayyyyyyy overcosted.
wannabe mexican
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:34:02 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/10/2010
Posts: 1,153
billiv15 wrote:
wannabe mexican wrote:
Also, Luke as the Rebel choice. I think this is the first addition to the game since WOTC dropped us that I actually think was poorly chosen. I just don't feel Luke was that great during the rebel years.


He defeats the Emperor and fulfills the prophecy by turning his Father back. If it weren't for the EU books that took him to ridiculous levels, he would be still considered the most powerful jedi. Remember, Star Wars existed long before the ability to eat a planet was created. But let's no forget, Luke saved the galaxy from the Dark Side, and did so almost entirely on his own.

Now, he isn't just a 100pt Rebel version of the NR Luke GM anyway, so wait until you see him. But for those of us who remember the years where no other jedi could possibly outclass the Luke from RotJ, this character is for us. As for it being "poorly chosen" - I think only your choice of those words was poorly chosen. I understand others will agree with the opinion that Luke "wasn't that great as a Rebel" but the existence of that opinion does not make our choice poor. Luke was far and away the most important character in the Rebellion, and was the obvious choice for an Epic. "poor choice" would imply there were better one's that we ignored. That is patently untrue. Please name one character who fits this. I think you meant something else, but Luke was and is the best Rebel character, and his powers as a Rebel were quite great. I understand some of you, particularly the younger crowd won't accept that.


I have never liked Luke Skywalker. For me, the hero of Star Wars was always Han Solo. I remember when I was younger I would always fast forward through all the boring Dagobah stuff with Luke. The Death Star dual? He hid from Darth Vader and only came out to fight when Vader made him angry, teetering on the brink of the Dark Side then. Luke then proceeds to get owned by Palpatine, and it is only Palpatine's maltreatment of Luke that moved Vader to throw him down the shaft and redeem himself. So yeah, for me Luke has never been a hero.

While I am indeed younger than some here, I wouldn't consider myself part of the young crowd. Of this ability to eat a planet, I have heard nothing. I am not huge fan of the Old, old Republic books and games. All I know about that era is from wookieepedia and the Tales of the Jedi Part 1 omnibus I finished last week. As for what happens after the films, I am still working my way through the NJO books, so guess I have this greatness of GMLS to come.

I didn't mean to offend those who put effort into making Luke. I am sure he will be great fun. I just don't think he can compare to Vader, Mace and others. But then again, I don't really think the rebels had anyone who is worthy of being epic.
FlyingArrow
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:39:21 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
wannabe mexican wrote:
But then again, I don't really think the rebels had anyone who is worthy of being epic.


Looking only at his jedi powers at the time, I'd agree, but in terms of plot... there's enough there to add up to "epic" by adding in things that can

* easily turn an enemy or
* give ridiculous inspiration to allies or
* allow him to get major dark-side bonuses.

(See my quick attempt above.)
wannabe mexican
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:51:44 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/10/2010
Posts: 1,153
In all fairness I think the Rebels were always gonna be a hard one to do. The choice I guess is either Luke, Han or EU person, the only one I can think of would be Galen Marek. I don't think Han would fit the very Melee orientated set.

I don't really know what I was hoping for, but this has made me think very hard about Return of the Jedi, and I can see how Luke was no longer a farmboy anymore. Again, I didn't mean to dismiss the hard work, I'm guessing done by billiv15, that must have gone into creating him.
creme_brule
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:56:01 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/31/2009
Posts: 1,701
jedispyder wrote:
FlyingArrow wrote:

Maybe I missed it, but I didn't hear the factions mentioned. I assumed Luke was Super Grand Master Luke and the Rebel was Yoda.

We already have a NR Grand Master Luke, no reason to remake that. Luke is Rebel and Yoda is Republic. How epic could a Rebel Yoda be? He can't attack or anything, it'd just a souped up Yoda of Dagobah which wouldn't be all that great in Dynamic Duo.

lol, I think I could make up an epic Rebel yoda of dagobah. This is probably based on right when Order 66 was initiated to when he spent his last years in dagobah. Something along the lines of:
Cost: 100
HP: 150
DEF: 22
ATK: +0
DMG: 0

SA

Unique
Intuition
Avoid Defeat
Mettle
Stealth
Light Tutor
Meditation (Replaces turn. This character gains +3 force)

Force Powers:

Force 6; Renewal 6; MotF 5
Force Defense
Surprise Move
Force Push 1 (Just for the heck of it :p)
Levitation 3 (Force 3; replaces attacks. One huge or smaller character within 6 squares is moved to another space within 6 squares)
Force Alter 2 (Force 2; one character within 6 squares rerolls last roll at -4)
Force Stun
Force Spirit 8


CE
---
Allied character start with +3 Force (even if they do not have a force rating). Allied characters gain Force Renewal 1. Allied characters may spend this characters Force Points up to two times per turn. Allies gain +4 DEF. Allies gain Avoid Defeat and Mettle.

This critter will probably never die...Intuition; Stealth; Avoid Defeat and Mettle will keep him alive for a looooong time...

Wishful thinking...:P
Sithborg
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 4:59:48 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator, Rules Guy

Joined: 8/24/2008
Posts: 5,201
FlyingArrow wrote:
At 120+ points, they better all be "suped up fanboy versions" or they're all wayyyyyyy overcosted.


I'm already prepared for those complaints. My figure is not going to be what most are expecting, especially with how the others are going to look. It is definately balanced for the set, and I think some will like it for mass battles. Hopefully the one fanwank thing I gave it will limit the complaints, even if the other major fan want didn't make it...

And for the Rebels, well, you really have to think about that. Given the goal of the set, there were really only 2 other candidates. Obi-wan and the VSA. Would anyone really pick those over Luke?
FlyingArrow
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:01:47 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
wannabe mexican wrote:
In all fairness I think the Rebels were always gonna be a hard one to do. The choice I guess is either Luke, Han or EU person, the only one I can think of would be Galen Marek. I don't think Han would fit the very Melee orientated set.

I don't really know what I was hoping for, but this has made me think very hard about Return of the Jedi, and I can see how Luke was no longer a farmboy anymore. Again, I didn't mean to dismiss the hard work, I'm guessing done by billiv15, that must have gone into creating him.


Obi-Wan from ANH could have been epic. He wasn't 'defeated' by Darth Vader after all, and Vader was certainly worthy of an epic piece.

I think Yoda could have been, too. That would have been an interesting one.

But I think Luke was a good choice, too. The only reason it seems weird is that the Rebel Luke would be 'better' than GMLS.
swinefeld
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:17:15 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
Side note: Epic Luke is 154 points
Lord_Ball
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:18:38 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/19/2010
Posts: 1,029
billiv15 wrote:
Which ones of these characters do you expect to not be "suped up fanboy versions"? As for him becoming a knight, etc, a lot of that has been retconned. Again, I require that anyone who is critical of the choice, please provide the obvious alternative that we missed, and remember that for 25 years of SWs history, there was no other but Luke as a Rebel. Judging by all the stuff that came way later, is not how we grew up. I don't particularly care if you or anything thinks Luke was or wasn't all that as a Rebel, a great many others spent their child hood believing otherwise. Just because Lucas added a great deal of material later that gives you that opinion.


I don't expect ANY of them to be suped of fanboy versions. Why, because fanboy version are usually skewed into poor representation of each character, instead I expect them to be more like all encompassing of the characters at the pinnacle of their power, but I guess my expectations were too great, oh well.

I will grant you that an epic Rebel is a tough one, Obiwan and Starkiller do seem more valid options than Luke, but perhaps something more grand - think multi unique or vehicle (chewbacca in AT-ST perhaps).

Growing up my faves were always Han Solo and Darth Vader, The reason I never believed Luke to be all that is right there in the movies - he's clearly portrayed as the underdog in the final battle, and not as some macho good guy bad@**.
creme_brule
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:28:11 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 12/31/2009
Posts: 1,701
Lord_Ball wrote:
billiv15 wrote:
Which ones of these characters do you expect to not be "suped up fanboy versions"? As for him becoming a knight, etc, a lot of that has been retconned. Again, I require that anyone who is critical of the choice, please provide the obvious alternative that we missed, and remember that for 25 years of SWs history, there was no other but Luke as a Rebel. Judging by all the stuff that came way later, is not how we grew up. I don't particularly care if you or anything thinks Luke was or wasn't all that as a Rebel, a great many others spent their child hood believing otherwise. Just because Lucas added a great deal of material later that gives you that opinion.


I don't expect ANY of them to be suped of fanboy versions. Why, because fanboy version are usually skewed into poor representation of each character, instead I expect them to be more like all encompassing of the characters at the pinnacle of their power, but I guess my expectations were too great, oh well.

I will grant you that an epic Rebel is a tough one, Obiwan and Starkiller do seem more valid options than Luke, but perhaps something more grand - think multi unique or vehicle (chewbacca in AT-ST perhaps).

Growing up my faves were always Han Solo and Darth Vader, The reason I never believed Luke to be all that is right there in the movies - he's clearly portrayed as the underdog in the final battle, and not as some macho good guy bad@**.


Maybe Luke will have Long Shot +40 lol
FlyingArrow
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:35:55 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
Lord_Ball wrote:
billiv15 wrote:
Which ones of these characters do you expect to not be "suped up fanboy versions"? As for him becoming a knight, etc, a lot of that has been retconned. Again, I require that anyone who is critical of the choice, please provide the obvious alternative that we missed, and remember that for 25 years of SWs history, there was no other but Luke as a Rebel. Judging by all the stuff that came way later, is not how we grew up. I don't particularly care if you or anything thinks Luke was or wasn't all that as a Rebel, a great many others spent their child hood believing otherwise. Just because Lucas added a great deal of material later that gives you that opinion.


I don't expect ANY of them to be suped of fanboy versions. Why, because fanboy version are usually skewed into poor representation of each character, instead I expect them to be more like all encompassing of the characters at the pinnacle of their power, but I guess my expectations were too great, oh well.

I will grant you that an epic Rebel is a tough one, Obiwan and Starkiller do seem more valid options than Luke, but perhaps something more grand - think multi unique or vehicle (chewbacca in AT-ST perhaps).

Growing up my faves were always Han Solo and Darth Vader, The reason I never believed Luke to be all that is right there in the movies - he's clearly portrayed as the underdog in the final battle, and not as some macho good guy bad@**.


Of course he's the underdog - only 4 years of training versus probably the TWO most powerful Sith ever. (Arguments about which one of the two was more powerful... and Bane lovers, too... please take the argument to another thread.) But he is a portrait of courage to walk in there, and a portrait of character to not turn.

(Of course the whole idea that attacking evil will make you evil is pretty screwy, and the rest of the Star Wars franchise pretty well ignores that idea anyway, but that's also another thread.)
wannabe mexican
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 5:44:02 AM
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 1/10/2010
Posts: 1,153
I'm insanely glad that there is no Boba Fett in this set. Good call there gentlemen.
swinefeld
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:02:39 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 1/30/2009
Posts: 6,457
Location: Southern Illinois
wannabe mexican wrote:
I'm insanely glad that there is no Boba Fett in this set. Good call there gentlemen.


Cue scene in the Sarlacc from Robot Chicken. LOL
adamb0nd
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:05:41 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
Realistically, while star killer was obviously the most powerful rebel ever (though i am disgusted with the power levels seen in TFU video games)... luke is THE iconic rebel. As far as the films go, he was also the most powerful rebel. I might not think he is worthy of a 120+ point rendition, but if anyone is going to come close to that, without dipping into those god forsaken video games, it would be skywalker.

The only other option i would have gone with would have been a large base figure that represented the dream team... luke, han, chewie, leia, and the droids... encompassing the peek of all their abilities. That would be a great 140 point pieces, but would make so many builds virtually unplayable due to consuming so many vital uniques.
FlyingArrow
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:13:39 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 5/26/2009
Posts: 8,428
Epic R2-D2

Cost: 150
HP: 30
Def: 16
Atk: 0
Dmg: 0

Special Abilities:
Override
Droid Hero: If you are about to lose the game, on a save of 2 you instead win the game.
adamb0nd
Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:24:32 AM
Rank: Moderator
Groups: Member , Moderator

Joined: 9/16/2008
Posts: 2,302
FlyingArrow wrote:
Epic R2-D2

Cost: 150
HP: 30
Def: 16
Atk: 0
Dmg: 0

Special Abilities:
Override
Droid Hero: If you are about to lose the game, on a save of 2 you instead win the game.


Fantastic.

Also, since the pod cast specifically says not to post this stuff openly, i was hoping one of you guys with better ears+star wars knowledge could PM me. I have listened to the pod cast multiple times, and torn through wiki trying to figure out who they are talking about, but do not recognize the piece to locate it.

It seems obvious that it is the fringe representation... and its the 9th piece they list off. If someone could pm me what they are saying... id appreciate it.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Bloo Milk Theme Created by shinja
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net.
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.