|
Rank: Moderator Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008 Posts: 5,201
|
A poll isn't enough of a difference to have a second thread on this topic. You want a poll, wait for this thread to die.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/27/2008 Posts: 990
|
billiv15 wrote:I'm going to be quite honest here, a poll does nothing. In fact if anything, it does more potential harm than good. For example, let's say we had a poll, and it showed 90% of the people in the poll (maybe a whopping 100 votes - perhaps 50 real people assuming multiple accounts). The designers of a V-set ignore it, and those 50 people get mad because a poll showed "the community" wanted it. Or vice versa, they follow it, but since the vast majority of people didn't really want it, but for a variety of reasons didn't put down a vote, and then people step away from the V-sets because they aren't responding to the community.
Point is, opinions are much more useful, because they demonstrate the people who are really invested in a topic, they ignore people planting votes in a poll, and they demonstrates something a poll rarely can do well - the actual level of emotion tied into a topic for people. As a V-set planner, I much prefer discussion, and have little use for polls. That's why I didn't make a poll. If you really want one, instead of making another one, I'd discuss it with Sithborg in private and get an ok from the mods first. I'm sure if you have legitimate reasons, they will listen. If you just want to make others look bad, then I doubt you'll get anywhere. +1 This was a good thread, and I have to say I'm on the fence. My feet dangling over the Vader Sith Side though . I'd love to see it but there are umpteen valid reasons/opinions why we shouldnt see it and for that I can appreciate why we havnt had 1 before.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/23/2008 Posts: 942
|
Sithborg wrote:A poll isn't enough of a difference to have a second thread on this topic. You want a poll, wait for this thread to die. @ Sithberg, Second poll you have locked on this subject , what are you so afraid off, saying "A poll isn't enough of a difference to have a second thread on this topic" really is not a good reason to lock it, as it does not hurt or diminish what members have posted here. Yes it's true what Bill said that some might vote more than once by using different accounts but that can go to people voting on either side. I feel differently, I don't think a poll on it's own is any good, but a poll in conjunction with this thread would have been the right thing to do. The community is divided on this, or more acutely the what 10 to 15 who posted. Bill saying this ", but since the vast majority of people didn't really want it, but for a variety of reasons didn't put down a vote, and then people step away from the V-sets because they aren't responding to the community" This is a big assumption Bill and no offence but you're saying in the part i have bold-ed, that it is in fact what the community wants. This is drawing a conclusion based on what really is what you personally want. That might not have been what you were trying to convey, but the way you have put your post is in affect you specking for the whole community when in-fact it seems that those who have posted here is still divided on the topic. Bill said "Point is, opinions are much more useful" Well I think both are useful if done in conjunction with each other but neither are useful if done separately. As a poll on it's own is meaningless but a thread on it's own is just as meaning less because very often the ones shouting the loudest or post the most get there way, also with most of these threads tempers flare and threads get locked. Glad that this thread as not come to that and that is good. My comment just was not on about this thread in particular but in general. So very often no conclusion is made because the thread very often does not run long enough to reach one. which is why i think both a poll and a thread would be better with most topics on this site, as you still get members opinions but also get votes by members who will not post in a thread for whatever reason.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/4/2008 Posts: 1,441
|
dreadtech wrote: Bill saying this ", but since the vast majority of people didn't really want it, but for a variety of reasons didn't put down a vote, and then people step away from the V-sets because they aren't responding to the community"
This is a big assumption Bill and no offence but you're saying in the part i have bold-ed, that it is in fact what the community wants. This is drawing a conclusion based on what really is what you personally want. That might not have been what you were trying to convey, but the way you have put your post is in affect you specking for the whole community when in-fact it seems that those who have posted here is still divided on the topic.
Dave, I made two possible assumptive readings of a poll, neither of which was intended to be the "correct" reading. I was showing how easily reading a poll as community desire, either positively or negatively can be problematic. I didn't even get into the issue of poll bias wording, which is also a concern. I'm not sure why you picked out one of my "examples" of misreading and not the other. Actually, I do know why - because I've stated my opinion on this topic, and I must clearly be a person incapable of separating my own desires from that of the greater community - or perhaps you didn't intend to imply that about me :) I'd say fringe Han Solo in DotF pretty well establishes that I'm willing to make minis that I personally would never want to see made. Let me reiterate without example. The primary problem with using a poll for something like this, is that a poll suggests action to a lot of people, no matter what the real intention is. It suggests that it represents public opinion on a topic. It further in some small ways obligates the designers in one of two ways - to either follow it, or intentionally ignore it. Once a poll is done, there is no getting around, that the designers are doing one of the above choices, and no longer making independent choices based on other factors to most people. The ability to nuance a discussion with details, is almost entirely erased once poll data is available for most people - no matter how good or bad the information really is. It also suggests a privileging of this particular question, over and against other concerns and ideas. No poll, no matter how clearly written, avoids these trappings. Here's an example. The poll is made much like the ones closed, only representing this one small topic, with yes, no, don't care as the options. Sounds simple enough right? But what information are you really getting from it? Do you know if the people who voted no or yes really do care? Not at all, you might think you do, since they didn't click "don't care" but you only have a completely false view of their answers here. You don't know if they weigh this issue as higher or lower than others at all. People who vote "yes" might be thinking "YES RIGHT NOW, BEFORE ANYTHING ELSE IS EVER MADE!!!" or perhaps, "sure, I guess I'd be ok if the made one some day". Do you know if the people on the "yes" side would be more upset by not having one made, than the people on the "no" side by having one made? Not at all, can't tell the emotions tied up on a topic without posts. Now, you say it would add to the discussion, I do agree with that. However, there is no getting around that a poll attaches a degree of obligation to a topic, no matter what someone intends. People think it will matter, and they will, after a poll is done, change their expectations on that topic. I don't see the value in creating obligations for the design team, or if you prefer, "expectations". I think the tiny value of doing a poll, not nearly worth the potential setting of expectations worth doing, especially when you add in that I think polls tell you next to nothing about real information anyways. Polls are perhaps the worst judgment of public opinion available, and are near unanimously biased to the point of deceit - even when completely harmless and unintended. So I don't like them, and won't make one in my own threads on topics about V-set ideas. :)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/4/2008 Posts: 1,441
|
dreadtech wrote: Glad that this thread as not come to that and that is good. My comment just was not on about this thread in particular but in general. So very often no conclusion is made because the thread very often does not run long enough to reach one. which is why i think both a poll and a thread would be better with most topics on this site, as you still get members opinions but also get votes by members who will not post in a thread for whatever reason.
Since my post was long, I wanted to comment separately. I agree with this part - trying to acertain the opinions of those who won't type is important. Its just that a poll isn't a better way of doing that either, since the issue of multiple votes pretty well eliminates any value this has (I'd predict that for every 1 person who fits the above, there are 2-3 false votes in any poll on our SWMs sites). A better way to gain these opinions, are by the designers talking with others outside of the forums in as many ways as possible, and we already are doing this. I have a number of people I ask about what they think of X or Y who don't post. In addition, I listen to the feedback that gets filtered back to me from those that do post, about those they play with who do not (and actually this is a lot). I think this kind of feedback and interest is about 1000X better than anything a poll can ever provide.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/27/2008 Posts: 990
|
Just as a point, this is a quote from Wookipedia/Wikipedia of Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader. Its the next book on my list. I think it weighs in favour of saying Vader is a Sith or on the road to becoming one, which i know alot of people say... "Just because he is a sith duznt mean he should be in Sith faction." Granted, but other Legitimate Sith are so why not he? Or "Just because the factions broken duznt mean we should break it some more." Possibly but just as possibly not, its only conjecture that makes us say the faction is broken. With the inclusion of Sidious and Maul it actually errs on the side that the faction is indeed not broken and very much happy and well because they are in it! All the books and written material state the characters/minis we've had stated as 'the odd ones out' Lumiya/Caedus/Krayt and the One Sith are very much infact Sith, so they fit. I dont realy see the 'fudge it to fit' of those ones into the faction. They again put more creedence for having characters that are/were function sith aka Sidious, Maul, Tyranus, Ventress(via affintiy with Tyranus because she never completed her training) and finally Vader to be in said faction....but thats a big can'o'worms to open!!
Anyway I got rambling again. Heres the quote...
Luceno devotes much of Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader to the internal conflict that Darth Vader undergoes as he tries to shed his former identity of Anakin Skywalker and relearn to master The Force. Palpatine intends for these early missions that he sends Vader on to be as much about learning what it means to be a Sith as they are about consolidating the rule of the nascent Empire.
|
|
Rank: Moderator Groups: Member
, Moderator, Rules Guy
Joined: 8/24/2008 Posts: 5,201
|
If you have an issue with me locking the two other duplicate threads, feel free to PM me. That said, please get back on topic
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/23/2008 Posts: 942
|
billiv15 wrote:dreadtech wrote: Glad that this thread as not come to that and that is good. My comment just was not on about this thread in particular but in general. So very often no conclusion is made because the thread very often does not run long enough to reach one. which is why i think both a poll and a thread would be better with most topics on this site, as you still get members opinions but also get votes by members who will not post in a thread for whatever reason.
Since my post was long, I wanted to comment separately. I agree with this part - trying to acertain the opinions of those who won't type is important. Its just that a poll isn't a better way of doing that either, since the issue of multiple votes pretty well eliminates any value this has (I'd predict that for every 1 person who fits the above, there are 2-3 false votes in any poll on our SWMs sites). A better way to gain these opinions, are by the designers talking with others outside of the forums in as many ways as possible, and we already are doing this. I have a number of people I ask about what they think of X or Y who don't post. In addition, I listen to the feedback that gets filtered back to me from those that do post, about those they play with who do not (and actually this is a lot). I think this kind of feedback and interest is about 1000X better than anything a poll can ever provide. Bill , I know what you were trying to say in the part of your post that quoted, I was just trying to point out how it came across. I was not actually accusing you of anything, just saying how it came across. Of cause not everyone will read your post and reach the same conclusion, but some will. As for what you have put above, Well I was saying that a poll and a thread would have been better than just one thread whether that be a thread like this one or a poll. I do agree that a poll on it's own would not be constructive. I am not 100% sure if I agree with how you view polls though done here or anywhere on SWM sites, but as it is not something I have looked into in any way I can not dismiss it either as anything can be abused. As for whether feedback from a thread like this is 1000x better, well i guess we just see these threads differently, but have no problem if threads like this are better for you. Again though I was not saying a poll would be better, but just as valid if done correctly and in conjunction with a thread like this. Not instead off, which is how your post reads as a reply to my post. Again probably not what you were saying but that's how it comes across to me. However you know we come from different parts of the world and posts do not translate or really convey what we are saying. I also think a Q&A thread with the desingers would be good on so many levals.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/4/2008 Posts: 1,441
|
I know we are planning a Q&A at Gencon, if there's a lot of interest in such a thing, we could do a thread (on Gamers). But since you can generally ask us anything already, I'm not positive its needed. But if you want one, go ahead and get it started. I at least would be willing to answer whatever I can, but I can't speak for the other designers in that regard.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 7/23/2008 Posts: 942
|
billiv15 wrote:I know we are planning a Q&A at Gencon, if there's a lot of interest in such a thing, we could do a thread (on Gamers). But since you can generally ask us anything already, I'm not positive its needed. But if you want one, go ahead and get it started. I at least would be willing to answer whatever I can, but I can't speak for the other designers in that regard. Ok just as a confirmation Bill are you one of the designers for this next set? If so which designer from last set has been dropped/desided not to continue or are there 4 of you on this set?
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/4/2008 Posts: 1,441
|
dreadtech wrote:billiv15 wrote:I know we are planning a Q&A at Gencon, if there's a lot of interest in such a thing, we could do a thread (on Gamers). But since you can generally ask us anything already, I'm not positive its needed. But if you want one, go ahead and get it started. I at least would be willing to answer whatever I can, but I can't speak for the other designers in that regard. Ok just as a confirmation Bill are you one of the designers for this next set? If so which designer from last set has been dropped/desided not to continue or are there 4 of you on this set? Designers for DotF - Eric Larson, Dennis Beard, Deri Morgan Designers for RaR - William Russell, Dennis Beard, Eric Frost Designer for Battle of Theed - Eric Larson Designers for Set 3 - TBA :)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 6/23/2010 Posts: 3,562 Location: The Hutt, New Zealand
|
I haven't read through the whole thread, but it could be cool to have a Sith character sometime who can bring in unique force users from the other dark side factions (which is mainly going to be Seperatists and Imperials I guess).
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/2/2009 Posts: 143
|
Pols are useless as a stand alone. They should never be seen as absolute in what is done for the community.
Anyways.... I personally would not want a Sith version of Vader created. I'm not saying I would be upset by it either. The only thing I would want for the game is balance and semi-accuracy. Who really cares if a peace makes total since to everyone? The game should be fun more then anything. Despite our levels of involvement in the game we can all agree on that.
We can go on for months on this topic. I'm glad to see that, even with out an actual company behind this, Star Wars Miniatures has a strong caring core of people. With out them, the game would surely become one with the force. I surely put my trust in the people, that we feel are best at making sound decisions, to continue making this such a fun game for all of us. Whether we agree or not on characters made, rules changes/clarifications, or simply something said, we know that they are doing what they feel is best for all of us. With that, I thank all those that have taken on the hard task of keep this game alive.
If a Sith Vader is never made or one is, it is ok to voice your opinions on it. Just remember that it should not be made personal, and the creators are doing what they feel is best for the game as a whole. If that means going against what the majority wants then, it must be done.
"God hears everything we ask for. He only gives us what he feels is what we need" My dad once told me. So can be said of those that are in charge of this game.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/27/2008 Posts: 990
|
General Ed wrote:Pols are useless as a stand alone. They should never be seen as absolute in what is done for the community.
Anyways.... I personally would not want a Sith version of Vader created. I'm not saying I would be upset by it either. The only thing I would want for the game is balance and semi-accuracy. Who really cares if a peace makes total since to everyone? The game should be fun more then anything. Despite our levels of involvement in the game we can all agree on that.
We can go on for months on this topic. I'm glad to see that, even with out an actual company behind this, Star Wars Miniatures has a strong caring core of people. With out them, the game would surely become one with the force. I surely put my trust in the people, that we feel are best at making sound decisions, to continue making this such a fun game for all of us. Whether we agree or not on characters made, rules changes/clarifications, or simply something said, we know that they are doing what they feel is best for all of us. With that, I thank all those that have taken on the hard task of keep this game alive.
If a Sith Vader is never made or one is, it is ok to voice your opinions on it. Just remember that it should not be made personal, and the creators are doing what they feel is best for the game as a whole. If that means going against what the majority wants then, it must be done.
"God hears everything we ask for. He only gives us what he feels is what we need" My dad once told me. So can be said of those that are in charge of this game. "You can't always get what you want, but you get what you need."Mick Jagger and Keith Richards My motto for life
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/27/2008 Posts: 990
|
billiv15 wrote:dreadtech wrote:billiv15 wrote:I know we are planning a Q&A at Gencon, if there's a lot of interest in such a thing, we could do a thread (on Gamers). But since you can generally ask us anything already, I'm not positive its needed. But if you want one, go ahead and get it started. I at least would be willing to answer whatever I can, but I can't speak for the other designers in that regard. Ok just as a confirmation Bill are you one of the designers for this next set? If so which designer from last set has been dropped/desided not to continue or are there 4 of you on this set? Designers for DotF - Eric Larson, Dennis Beard, Deri Morgan Designers for RaR - William Russell, Dennis Beard, Eric Frost Designer for Battle of Theed - Eric Larson Designers for Set 3 - TBA :) For names sake, I know who Eric(engineer),Denis (Boris),Deri(Fingersnteeth) are. Could you tell us who William and Eric are? Sorry if this is a stupid question and I apologise if it offends them
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/19/2010 Posts: 223 Location: Seattle
|
Would I like a Sith Vader? Yes please. I wouldnt like a swarm of 'em running about in the sith, but one certainly couldn't hurt.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 12/26/2008 Posts: 1,233
|
CerousMutor wrote:billiv15 wrote:dreadtech wrote:billiv15 wrote:I know we are planning a Q&A at Gencon, if there's a lot of interest in such a thing, we could do a thread (on Gamers). But since you can generally ask us anything already, I'm not positive its needed. But if you want one, go ahead and get it started. I at least would be willing to answer whatever I can, but I can't speak for the other designers in that regard. Ok just as a confirmation Bill are you one of the designers for this next set? If so which designer from last set has been dropped/desided not to continue or are there 4 of you on this set? Designers for DotF - Eric Larson, Dennis Beard, Deri Morgan Designers for RaR - William Russell, Dennis Beard, Eric Frost Designer for Battle of Theed - Eric Larson Designers for Set 3 - TBA :) For names sake, I know who Eric(engineer),Denis (Boris),Deri(Fingersnteeth) are. Could you tell us who William and Eric are? Sorry if this is a stupid question and I apologise if it offends them well William Russel is BIlliv15 lol. and im not sure who Eric is sorry
|
|
Rank: Moderator Groups: Member
, Moderator
Joined: 1/30/2009 Posts: 6,457 Location: Southern Illinois
|
Eric Frost is Ruhk, fyi
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 8/27/2008 Posts: 990
|
lol ahem sorry billiv15...a duh moment from me there. Always good to know the pedigre
|
|
Rank: Advanced Bloo Milk Member Groups: Member
Joined: 4/23/2008 Posts: 907 Location: Central Pa
|
countrydude82487 wrote:CerousMutor wrote:billiv15 wrote:dreadtech wrote:billiv15 wrote:I know we are planning a Q&A at Gencon, if there's a lot of interest in such a thing, we could do a thread (on Gamers). But since you can generally ask us anything already, I'm not positive its needed. But if you want one, go ahead and get it started. I at least would be willing to answer whatever I can, but I can't speak for the other designers in that regard. Ok just as a confirmation Bill are you one of the designers for this next set? If so which designer from last set has been dropped/desided not to continue or are there 4 of you on this set? Designers for DotF - Eric Larson, Dennis Beard, Deri Morgan Designers for RaR - William Russell, Dennis Beard, Eric Frost Designer for Battle of Theed - Eric Larson Designers for Set 3 - TBA :) For names sake, I know who Eric(engineer),Denis (Boris),Deri(Fingersnteeth) are. Could you tell us who William and Eric are? Sorry if this is a stupid question and I apologise if it offends them well William Russel is BIlliv15 lol. and im not sure who Eric is sorry Eric is Ruhk, or the player formerly known as 'Tier 1' before Delilah had his awesome hair cut.
|
|
Guest |